1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

.002" gauge test fails barely between cylinders

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by foampile, Aug 6, 2015.

  1. Aug 6, 2015 at 3:35 PM
    #1
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    I just did a thorough clean of both my cylinder head mating surfaces with a razor blade, WD-40 and then Brakeleen and then performed a feeler gauge test using .002" gauge, which I understand is the threshold according to Toyota.

    The test passes everywhere except on the left (driver) side in both narrow passages between the cylinders but fails barely cause I have to drive the gauge pretty hard, borderline force it to pass under the straightedge, when the straightedge is set lengthwise (along the long side of the head) in the middle. See below:

    feeler_gauge_test_2.jpg

    When it's set widthwise, it does not fail. See below:

    feeler_gauge_test_1.jpg

    The right (passenger) side head is fine, the .002" gauge doesn't slide under even when I push it hard.

    Is this something I should worry about, i.e. have the left head ironed out by a machinist?
     
  2. Aug 6, 2015 at 3:47 PM
    #2
    1MK

    1MK Desert Explorer

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2015
    Member:
    #145870
    Messages:
    857
    Gender:
    Male
    Southern California
    What are you using for a straight edge?

    If you have to force it under, it's within spec. A feeler gauge should be relatively easy to slide for a proper measurement.
     
  3. Aug 6, 2015 at 3:55 PM
    #3
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    14389017059831329964527.jpg
     
    specter208 and 1MK[QUOTED] like this.
  4. Aug 6, 2015 at 4:03 PM
    #4
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    Is .002" the proper threshold?
     
  5. Aug 6, 2015 at 4:09 PM
    #5
    1MK

    1MK Desert Explorer

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2015
    Member:
    #145870
    Messages:
    857
    Gender:
    Male
    Southern California
    Capture222.jpg Capture333.jpg
     
    File IFR and foampile[OP] like this.
  6. Aug 6, 2015 at 4:13 PM
    #6
    armyoffoo

    armyoffoo Scrotie McBoogerballs

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Member:
    #56988
    Messages:
    449
    Gender:
    Male
    Houston, TX
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tundra CM TRD Sport
    yes, anything over .002" should be machined. They are right, if you have to force it, it's over. Should go under and move with little to no drag.
     
    foampile[OP] likes this.
  7. Aug 6, 2015 at 4:14 PM
    #7
    1MK

    1MK Desert Explorer

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2015
    Member:
    #145870
    Messages:
    857
    Gender:
    Male
    Southern California
    According to the factory manual, you have .0039 to play with. If you're having a hard time getting a .002 in there, you're fine.

    Run it!
     
    foampile[OP] likes this.
  8. Aug 6, 2015 at 4:15 PM
    #8
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    Dude, no way .0039 can go under. :bananadance:
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2015
  9. Aug 6, 2015 at 5:42 PM
    #9
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    There is a little more warpage on the block mating surface. I can force a .0025" under in the same places. Is the threshold the same on both sides?
     
  10. Aug 6, 2015 at 7:25 PM
    #10
    Jimmyh

    Jimmyh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Member:
    #78991
    Messages:
    14,243
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prerunner SR5
    Yes you should have the head machined flat. That is a potential blown head gasket in the making. I think that the drivers side is the one that is most prone to blowing a head gasket from what I remember...
     
    DoorDing likes this.
  11. Aug 6, 2015 at 7:52 PM
    #11
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    I appreciate the concern, however, it's well within the spec.
     
  12. Aug 6, 2015 at 8:37 PM
    #12
    Jimmyh

    Jimmyh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Member:
    #78991
    Messages:
    14,243
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prerunner SR5
    I was just going by your post where you said it failed. I didn't look up the specifications:

    Where you said: " performed a feeler gauge test using .002" gauge, which I understand is the threshold according to Toyota.

    The test passes everywhere except on the left (driver) side in both narrow passages between the cylinders but fails
    barely cause I have to drive the gauge pretty hard, borderline force it to pass under the straightedge."


    If it is well within specifications why are you even asking about it?

    Is 0.002 the threshold or not? If it is I would get it machined, If it is not I would not worry about it.

    Color me confused. :\
     
    DoorDing likes this.
  13. Aug 6, 2015 at 9:01 PM
    #13
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    I was asking to verify that my test that I was passing was indeed right and about gauge sizes.
     
  14. Aug 6, 2015 at 9:19 PM
    #14
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    Which @1MK answered
     
  15. Aug 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM
    #15
    Jimmyh

    Jimmyh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Member:
    #78991
    Messages:
    14,243
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prerunner SR5
    I do see by 1MK's post that the cylinder head is allowed 0.0039 inch on the cylinder head. and 0.0020 inch on the engine block.

    So no, 0.0020 inch is not the correct threshold for the cylinder head, 0.0039 inch is correct for the head.

    The cylinder block head face should be checked using the 0.0020 inch gauge.
     
    foampile[OP] likes this.
  16. Aug 6, 2015 at 9:24 PM
    #16
    Jimmyh

    Jimmyh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Member:
    #78991
    Messages:
    14,243
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prerunner SR5
    But that isn't what you asked in the original post.

    Whatever... My head is blowing up.
     
  17. Aug 6, 2015 at 9:52 PM
    #17
    Torspd

    Torspd Tor-nication

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Member:
    #22958
    Messages:
    26,342
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tor
    The Great America!
    Vehicle:
    MMVI 4.4L 4x4 Access Cab
    Torspd Custom Turbo kit [] Borg Warner 9180EFR Turbo [] Haltech Elite 2500 [] TiAL Q BOV [] TiAL V44 Wastegate @ 15psi [] CP Pistons [] CP Carrillo Rods [] ARP Head studs [] ARP Main Studs [] ARP Header - Head Studs [] Ported Heads w/ 1mm oversized valves intake/exhaust [] Brian Crower Forged Stroker Crank [] Darton M.I.D. Sleeved Block [] Kelford Camshafts [] Torspd 160* T-stat mod [] APR Large Fuel Rail [] Walbro 460 LPH E85 Fuel Pump [] FueLab FPR [] APR T56 Conversion Kit [] KP RACING Built T56 [] McLeod Racing Custom Twin Disk Clutch [] One Piece Aluminum Driveshaft [] MGW Shifter [] Custom lowering kit [] Ohlins Front Coilovers [] QA1rear shocks [] Custom Ron Davis Radiator [] Dual SPAL Electric Fans []
    As others said, you should never have to force in the gauge. I bet the block's deck is closer to .0020" without forcing it.

    Put it back together.
     
  18. Aug 6, 2015 at 10:29 PM
    #18
    foampile

    foampile [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Member:
    #68807
    Messages:
    1,081
    Gender:
    Male
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2007 V6 4WD 6 speed Extended Cab
    So I'm well within the spec on the head side and a little warped on the block side (.0025" but not .003") on the driver side. The other side all good.
     
  19. Aug 7, 2015 at 1:26 AM
    #19
    Jimmyh

    Jimmyh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Member:
    #78991
    Messages:
    14,243
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prerunner SR5
    Yes. If you can get a 0.0025 under the straight edge on the block head mating surface it is too much. Your head surface seems to be well within specification at 0.0020.

    My thought is that if the block is out of specification at 0.0025 and the head reads 0.0020 at the same area the total flatness is off by 0.0045. As in a build up of tolerances that were maybe not considered. And could be a contributing cause of the blown head gasket on the drivers side head. 4.5 thousandths of an inch is quite a gap in a head mating surface.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2015
  20. Aug 7, 2015 at 2:47 AM
    #20
    Jimmyh

    Jimmyh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Member:
    #78991
    Messages:
    14,243
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prerunner SR5
    The unfortunate part of all this is that IAW the service manual there isn't an option to machine either the head or the block. Both state to replace if they are out of specifications. You may be able to get by with a good head gasket sealant such as coppercoat or something like it.

    http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Tech/engine-head-gasket-design-and-installation-tips.html

    Head Gasket Coatings
    There are mixed feelings on whether or not you should apply a sealer or coating to head gaskets before installing them. Some guys like to apply a "copper coat", such as KW Copper Coat or Permatex Copper Spray-A-Gasket. Years ago, some would even spray paint their gaskets before installing them. The idea is that it should help seal up small imperfections in the deck or head surfaces. Success can be achieved with and without copper spray - the individual manufacturer will usually specify whether or not you should use sealer with their gaskets.

    But as always a good man has got to know his limitations. ;)
     
    foampile[OP] likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top