1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

03 2.7l vs 09 2.7l

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by glockaxis, May 22, 2009.

  1. May 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM
    #1
    glockaxis

    glockaxis [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Member:
    #17349
    Messages:
    39
    Gender:
    Male
    I used to own an 03 Tacoma base model 2wd automatic but had to sell it years ago due to finances. That thing was dependable but slow as molasses flowing upstream. I'd like to get a new Prerunner Access Cab or 4wd Access Cab in the 4cyclinder 5-speed but have to test it out to see if it has a tad more pep than my 03 (the vvt technology plus 5-speed tranmission should help I'm guessing). I'm not expecting a rocket, I know that.

    I don't know if I can stretch it to the V6 and if I do I'll get the 6-speed (although I've read about some problems with that).

    I don't have anything to tow but would use the bed for home projects and moving things. I also have a wife and a 2 and 4 year old but this wouldn't be our main car.

    Thanks

    I posted this in the New Member forum but hopefully will get some responses here as it's a 4 cyl section.
     
  2. May 22, 2009 at 7:04 PM
    #2
    beastlytaco

    beastlytaco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Member:
    #7660
    Messages:
    4,044
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ian
    Vehicle:
    08 Access Cab SR5
    the new 2.7s, push about 159Hp, and have 180 torque, this is all stock. 0-60 for mine was about 11 seconds, after a few upgrades and features, it reduced slightly to 9.5 to 10 seconds on average.
     
  3. May 22, 2009 at 7:10 PM
    #3
    Anthony999

    Anthony999 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Member:
    #5397
    Messages:
    318
    Gender:
    Male
    Glendale, AZ
    Vehicle:
    05 Tacoma
    MB Seven X Wheels, Hankook Optima Tires, Billet Grille, Blacked out headlights tailights and third brake light, LEER 700 Series tonneau cover, Blacked out emblems, Wolo air horn, Sony Xplod stereo, 8" Bazooka subwoofer, painted to match bumpers, leather arm rests.
    I have an 05 2.7 5 speed, and my dad has an 07 v6 auto, and after driving both (mine on a daily basis, his on a weekly basis) Ive noticed only a few things. The 2.7 in my opinion picks up speed off the start a bit quicker, but is nothing compared to the V6 once you get to about 30mph. But it just depends on how hard you drive it, and once you break in the engine. So the 2.7 has a little more pep than people give it credit for.
     
  4. May 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM
    #4
    glockaxis

    glockaxis [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Member:
    #17349
    Messages:
    39
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks! I'm looking forward to test driving a few pretty soon.
     
  5. May 23, 2009 at 6:15 AM
    #5
    sweater914

    sweater914 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2009
    Member:
    #12597
    Messages:
    233
    Gender:
    Male
    North Dakota
    Vehicle:
    '09 I4 5spd Access Cab Timberland Mica SR5
    For your daily needs the 4 cly should be adequate. The 5spd is almost a must, the auto is still a 4 spd unit which given the current availability of 5 even 6spd autos is a little behind the curve. I have a 2wd truck the gearing is slightly different compared to the pre-runner or 4x4, but driving in town I can not even get into 5th gear unless I'm doing 40mph or better, the gearing is so tall for 5th the engine sits below 1500rpm which it doesn't like. The last tank of gas averaged 21.8 mpg, with 90% city driving, I'm thrilled, the wife's old F150 averaged 12 mpg in the same conditions. We also tow a small pop up camper.

    Acceleration is at least comparable to the old F150 with a 4.6 V8, definitely better than my 4cly Ranger. The gearing is tall through the tranny 2nd gear will take you through 60mph in the Taco.
     
  6. May 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM
    #6
    agtex42

    agtex42 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Member:
    #13713
    Messages:
    54
    Gender:
    Male
    I've had my Reg Cab PreRunner for a little over two months now and I couldn't be happier. The 5 speed really is fun to drive and the truck doesn't have any problems getting out into traffic or keeping up on the highway. My old Chevy got 13 mpg city and I have yet to put a tank through the Tacoma that has yielded less than 23. I haven't been able to take in on any dedicated highway trips yet, but I'm sure it would yield somewhere close to EPA since that's what I'm getting around town. Just got done with the 15k maintenance and went ahead and swapped to full synthetic in the engine, transmission, and differential so I might squeak out a half mile more per gallon but we'll just have to see. I have a couple of buddies with the V-6 and I prefer the gas mileage and maintenance scheudule of the 2.7, if you're only looking to get an Access Cab I say go for the 4 cylinder and don't look back.
     
  7. May 24, 2009 at 7:47 PM
    #7
    glockaxis

    glockaxis [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Member:
    #17349
    Messages:
    39
    Gender:
    Male
    Agtex42, so your original offer for 18,000 on the Access Cab was rejected by the dealer, or was the price on your used regular cab just too good? Did both trucks ride the same for you? Also, do you have the 5-speed?
     
  8. May 26, 2009 at 5:34 PM
    #8
    agtex42

    agtex42 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Member:
    #13713
    Messages:
    54
    Gender:
    Male
    Haha, yeah the guys at the local dealership were all idiots. I knew more about the truck than the salesman (the guy had to ask where they were parked on the lot) and then the sales manager tried to tell me that their sticker price was $500 over their invoice so the most they could knock off was $250. Then I whipped out my invoice pricing data from Edmunds and and Cars.com and suggested they should find out wether they're dealing with an informed buyer before they lie directly to my face. That whole fiasco combined with the fact that the used reg cab was an incredible deal made up my mind for me. I think it'd be nice to have the Access Cab for more dry storage, but with the money I saved on the used truck I was able to buy a Leer Shell which more than makes up for the extra cargo volume of the Access Cab. I've put almost 3,000 miles on it over the past couple of months and I have no complaints. The 5-speed shifts great and the 4 cylinder move the truck along just fine.
     
  9. Aug 11, 2009 at 10:59 PM
    #9
    mulkey

    mulkey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Member:
    #21029
    Messages:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Will
    Louisiana
    Vehicle:
    2016 Limited 4x4 Barcelona Red
    stock
    hell yes it does! i love my 2.7 o5 prerunner!
     
  10. Aug 12, 2009 at 5:07 AM
    #10
    sriley727

    sriley727 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Member:
    #16735
    Messages:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Aiken, SC
    Vehicle:
    08 Reg cab PreRunner SR5
    Bone stock
    If you get the pre-runner and not the base "paw paw" model, you'll get a shorter rear gear ratio. That really helps with the acceleration, especially in city driving. It will feel a lot stronger down low.
     
  11. Aug 17, 2009 at 5:27 AM
    #11
    xsvtoyz

    xsvtoyz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Member:
    #9099
    Messages:
    182
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    AL
    Oklahoma
    Vehicle:
    03 Pre-Runner Inprogress
    HID (ACA)/ Web cams/ Header/Full Custom exhaust/ K&N FIPK II/SuperCharger
    03 Pre-Runner standard cab auto
    I upgraded to 32 in tires and the truck was dog a$$ slow. Had power to go where ever but slow. I added cams, header, cat back and nada still slow just not as slow. S/C made it better than the newer models but MPG is around 20 all the time. Not so good.
     
  12. Aug 17, 2009 at 6:17 AM
    #12
    98tacoma27

    98tacoma27 is going full "SANDWICH" Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Member:
    #11714
    Messages:
    67,724
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ben
    Not Beech Creek
    Vehicle:
    05 Tundra SR5 (+295k AND COUNTING), 2006 F350 King Ranch 6.0L
    Some stuff. Not a lot, just some.
    You would notice a huge difference if it were a manual. Are you sure it wasn't a 2.4L (2rz) ?
     

Products Discussed in

To Top