1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

11mpg difference between city and highway

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas (1995-2004)' started by Pescado, Apr 12, 2016.

  1. Apr 12, 2016 at 1:03 PM
    #1
    Pescado

    Pescado [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Member:
    #170696
    Messages:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Vancouver
    Vehicle:
    2002 Lunar Mist TRD DC
    265/75/16 BFG KO2, Pro Comp 7069, General Springs HD leaf pack, Bilstein 5100's, Snugtop Canopy
    Normally my truck doesn't leave the city, and my mileage is pretty bad. 13mpg over the winter which by the sounds of it isn't too far off given my climate and city terrain that I drive through.

    The weird thing is when I take the truck on the highway I'm getting unreal mileage. Last trip was 24mpg (100% highway).

    My question is, how the heck is there such a huge difference? Is my city driving (short trips, steep hills, short distance between lights) a big enough reason? I figure running E load tires might have something to do with it but just wondering if anyone else out there has experienced similar results.
     
  2. Apr 12, 2016 at 7:18 PM
    #2
    Madjik_Man

    Madjik_Man The Rembrandt of Rattle Can

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Member:
    #26893
    Messages:
    19,745
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado Front Range
    Vehicle:
    1998 Ext Cab 3.4 4x4 TRD 5MT, 2004 DC 3.4 4x4 TRD
    What size are your tires?
     
  3. Apr 12, 2016 at 7:27 PM
    #3
    Pescado

    Pescado [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Member:
    #170696
    Messages:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Vancouver
    Vehicle:
    2002 Lunar Mist TRD DC
    265/75/16 BFG KO2, Pro Comp 7069, General Springs HD leaf pack, Bilstein 5100's, Snugtop Canopy
    265/75/16E KO2's
     
  4. Apr 12, 2016 at 8:07 PM
    #4
    Madjik_Man

    Madjik_Man The Rembrandt of Rattle Can

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Member:
    #26893
    Messages:
    19,745
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado Front Range
    Vehicle:
    1998 Ext Cab 3.4 4x4 TRD 5MT, 2004 DC 3.4 4x4 TRD
    BFG tires run smaller than advertised. Your true tire diameter is probably 31", if that. Which is a bit undersized for our speedo/odometer gear. Which means the faster you are going the more "over" your speedometer is reading which in turn turns more miles on the odometer.

    So if you're calculating your mpg by using the tripometer/gallons consumed, then your calculations are off.

    And it's not a linear equation to figure out the difference in actual vs reported mileage. For example, when you're going 30 mph, your speedo/odo is probably pretty close to being spot on, but when you're going 65 or 70 mph, you are probably reading 3 mph faster than actual.

    I have 31" tires and have the same issue.

    Best way to see if this is your problem is to have a GPS device that measures your speed and compare to your speedometer. I figured out something wasn't right years before I had a GPS device. On a long highway road trip I compared mile markers to my tripometer. It was pretty far off after a full tank of gas.
     
  5. Apr 12, 2016 at 8:18 PM
    #5
    Pescado

    Pescado [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Member:
    #170696
    Messages:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Vancouver
    Vehicle:
    2002 Lunar Mist TRD DC
    265/75/16 BFG KO2, Pro Comp 7069, General Springs HD leaf pack, Bilstein 5100's, Snugtop Canopy
    Interesting stuff, thanks for your input. I've been using fuelly which is based on odometer and fuel used. Ill try measuring my actual tire diameter and use a GPS to see if I can get a more accurate picture.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top