1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

265/70R17 vs. 265/65R17 - Effect on MPG

Discussion in 'Wheels & Tires' started by JoeMX82, Feb 29, 2012.

  1. Feb 29, 2012 at 7:17 AM
    #1
    JoeMX82

    JoeMX82 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    Member:
    #73686
    Messages:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joe
    Houston
    Vehicle:
    2012 TRD Sport DBL Cab - White
    I am looking at going with the BFG Rugged Terrain as my truck is used on the highway only but I like the more aggressive look. My question is would the 70 series give me worse MPG due to being a bit heavier or would it be offset by the taller size and lower RPMs?
     
  2. Feb 29, 2012 at 7:23 AM
    #2
    NetMonkey

    NetMonkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Member:
    #8536
    Messages:
    1,734
    Gender:
    Male
    Geogetown, TX
    Vehicle:
    2010, 4x4, DC, off-road, shortbed, automatic
    Toytec Ultimate Lift @ 3", Mickey Thompson MTZ's 285/75/16, Moto Metal 955b, rear 2" ALL, Marlin Crawler sliders
    you wont notice that much difference in mpg
     
  3. Feb 29, 2012 at 11:26 AM
    #3
    Large

    Large Red

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2011
    Member:
    #63268
    Messages:
    22,402
    Gender:
    Male
    I ran the stockers for 1k miles & was getting 19-21 mpg constantly, switched to BFGs 265/70s & still getting about the same mileage but couldn't get back to 21 :( just hovered around 20.
     
  4. Feb 29, 2012 at 11:31 AM
    #4
    BARTRD

    BARTRD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Member:
    #50711
    Messages:
    337
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brian
    Monroe, Ga
    Vehicle:
    '07 RR TRD Sport
    Volant CAI with optional skoop, Magna-Flow exhaust, K&N drop-in air filter, WeatherTechs, Wet Okole, kenwood navigation head unit, de-badged, 15% tint all around, factory roof rack fitted with Thule fairing, billy 5100 on all 4 corners, ICON AAL, n-fab light bar with 4 hella 500s, rear lights mounted under bumper
    I have 265/70/17 and sit right at 20. Got 22.5 on a road trip to Florida running about 65-70 all the way. So you won't notice much difference if any
     
  5. Feb 29, 2012 at 11:49 AM
    #5
    Pugga

    Pugga Pasti-Dip Free 1983 - 2015... It was a good run

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Member:
    #39131
    Messages:
    32,597
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    '13 Ford F-150 SCREW
    F-150 Mod
    With the 70 series, I noticed slightly better MPG's on the highway and no noted losses in town.
     
    Garfish307 likes this.
  6. Feb 29, 2012 at 4:39 PM
    #6
    ranger mac

    ranger mac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Member:
    #73159
    Messages:
    49
    Gender:
    Male
    go for the 70s you will appreciate the slightly more aggressive look from the 1.25" or so. Most won't recognize the difference, but you will.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top