1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

60D. Which package is better?

Discussion in 'Photography' started by Krazie Sj, Dec 27, 2012.

  1. Dec 27, 2012 at 7:29 PM
    #21
    whiteneck

    whiteneck Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    Member:
    #92675
    Messages:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Michael
    Oakville, ON
    Vehicle:
    02 V6 Stepside TRD 5-speed manual
    Lens focal lengths are standard, crop sensor, full frame, EF, EF-S or otherwise.

    So if you have a 100mm lens, it will give you a certain field of view on a 35mm SLR (or full frame digital). If you use that same lens on a 'crop body', the focal length is still 100mm....but the outsides of the image circle (projected by the lens into the camera) will not be recorded by the camera's sensor (because it's smaller). So you end up with an image that covers a smaller field of view.

    It doesn't matter if the lens is EF or EF-S....50mm will give you the same FOV (on the same camera).

    The only reason why the crop factor exists, is because the 'standard' for so long was 35mm film. So when they came out with cameras of the same size & format, but with smaller sensors...they wanted to let people know that the FOV would be different that what they were used to with 35mm film.
     
  2. Dec 27, 2012 at 9:52 PM
    #22
    6spd

    6spd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Member:
    #72162
    Messages:
    813
    Gender:
    Male
    san diego
    Vehicle:
    2012 4x4
    wat.

    crop factor is 1.5/6 for canons. 100mm will be 100mm on FF, but will be much longer on a crop sensor body since the the outer circle will be "cropped" out, yielding roughly 150/160mm focal length.

    given a particular lens, the DOF will different on a FF vs. a crop sensor body. on a 50mm 1.4, the FF will have a much thinner DOF vs a crop body sensor.

    but you can believe what you want to believe.
     
  3. Dec 27, 2012 at 11:35 PM
    #23
    MightyMouse-SCT

    MightyMouse-SCT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Member:
    #44862
    Messages:
    15,508
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Gabriel
    O'SIDE CA
    Vehicle:
    MightyMouse-SCT - 2011 LT 4x4 Desert Runner
    Long Travel Total chaos kit, fox shocks, smp fab , dmz sua, glassworks, method wheels.
  4. Dec 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM
    #24
    Krazie Sj

    Krazie Sj [OP] Resident Jackass

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Member:
    #9849
    Messages:
    13,496
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Power Serge
    LV-426 (Acheron)
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Off Road 4x4
    Borla Catback Exhaust, Airaid Short Ram Intake, 285x75R16 Mickey Thompson MTZs, 16" Konig Countersteer rims, ARB Bumper, All Pro LT w/Walker Evan Shocks front and back, All Pro expedition leaf pack, 10,000lb Superwinch, Intake Manifold Spacer, Bed Rack with ARB RTT, Rotopack and Hi Lift mounted, Husky Liner mats and an air freshener from 1995.
    I was limiting myself to those two because if the package deals. However as others have said, save my sheckles and get a decent lens instead of the lower quality package lenses.

    Again I'm just getting into dslrs right now but I've been using my canon AE-1 program and AT-1 for the past 5+ years now. I didn't want to drop like 1500-2000 on a 5d. I won't need it that badly, but I didn't want an Eos rebel either. Little plasticy for me. Had I gone cheaper I would have looked at Nikon. Their lower range stuff seems better quality. However fr what I read (and I could have interpreted it wrong) the lenses with Nikon are stabilized, not the body. Making them much more expensive.
     
  5. Dec 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM
    #25
    krap22

    krap22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Member:
    #53389
    Messages:
    18,857

    here do some reading on ef-s vs ef. The s does not stand for stabilization. there is normally an is for cannon that specifies image stabilization.

    http://www.slrphotographyguide.com/camera/canon-digital-slr/EF-EFS-lens.shtml
     
  6. Dec 28, 2012 at 12:51 PM
    #26
    carcharias

    carcharias Giggiddy what what

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2011
    Member:
    #48988
    Messages:
    4,676
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Los Angeles, CA
    Vehicle:
    '11 AC MGM OR
    Kings all-around w/ 700lb coils, Dakar leaf pack, TC uca's, DO single hoop bumper, BAMF bolt-on sliders w/ kickouts, Rigid 20" e-series spot/flood, aFe pro-dry, BFG KM2 255/85/16, silver TRD FJ wheels, WARN M8000-s, Access LE, Grillcraft, BAMF lightbar, BAMF rear dif skid, BAMF LCA skids, window tint, Wet Okoles, WeatherTech floorliners, Silverstar lights, led dome lights, Redline Tuning hood struts, center console lock mod, mag-lite mod, extra d-rings, re-routed exhaust, ATO skids, ATO Hi-Lift mounts, pipe tailgate lock, seatbelt alarm delete, wheel/spare locks, Viper 5901, LoJack... WISHLIST: a golden canary that poops platinum
  7. Dec 28, 2012 at 8:37 PM
    #27
    whiteneck

    whiteneck Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    Member:
    #92675
    Messages:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Michael
    Oakville, ON
    Vehicle:
    02 V6 Stepside TRD 5-speed manual
    I think we're agreeing, just saying the same thing differently. Either way I believe you are correct.



    Thanks, krap22. It turns out you were right about the S, IS thing. However, I stand by my earlier statement that focal length is always referred to relative to 35mm standard, "S" or otherwise.
     
  8. Dec 28, 2012 at 9:13 PM
    #28
    Krazie Sj

    Krazie Sj [OP] Resident Jackass

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Member:
    #9849
    Messages:
    13,496
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Power Serge
    LV-426 (Acheron)
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Off Road 4x4
    Borla Catback Exhaust, Airaid Short Ram Intake, 285x75R16 Mickey Thompson MTZs, 16" Konig Countersteer rims, ARB Bumper, All Pro LT w/Walker Evan Shocks front and back, All Pro expedition leaf pack, 10,000lb Superwinch, Intake Manifold Spacer, Bed Rack with ARB RTT, Rotopack and Hi Lift mounted, Husky Liner mats and an air freshener from 1995.
    http://m.bestbuy.ca/defaultpage.asp...etails.aspx?ajax=true&sku=10079240&lang=en-CA

    http://m.bestbuy.ca/defaultpage.asp...etails.aspx?ajax=true&sku=10009174&lang=en-CA

    http://m.bestbuy.ca/defaultpage.asp...etails.aspx?ajax=true&sku=10093802&lang=en-CA

    So here's my next dilemma. Looking at lenses. The one says its cheaper because of changes in materials and assembly line but still delivering the same quality as the more expensive ones. However the $400 one says it focuses faster and has more elements/groups. I'm still reading up on what they means exactly but seeing as its only a $130 difference, is that extra dough really worth it?
     
  9. Dec 28, 2012 at 9:22 PM
    #29
    mikesdoublecab

    mikesdoublecab LT Chase Truck

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Member:
    #7334
    Messages:
    5,975
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mohawk Mike
    Glendale, CA
    Vehicle:
    01 Tacoma DoubleCab V6 Prerunner
    Engage Offroad custom LT kit with King coilovers and bypasses, Deaver J59 leaf packs with custom 8 inch shackles and Bilstein 7100 12" travel shocks, 16x8 Eagle Alloy 137s, 285-75-16 BFG KM2s, custom front bumper and skid, Procomp H911 foglights, custom rear bumper and spare tire carrier, bed bar, Engage Offroad custom chase light rack, Icom V8000 radio
    those links dont work for me..
     
  10. Dec 28, 2012 at 9:41 PM
    #30
    6spd

    6spd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Member:
    #72162
    Messages:
    813
    Gender:
    Male
    san diego
    Vehicle:
    2012 4x4
    uhh, no. read again, just for the sake of learning.

    also

    the "s" designation in an ef-s lens from canon means that it is designed for crop sensor camera bodies. the "IS" is for image stablization on the lens, which will account for the difference in price compared to a similar focal length, but non "IS" lens

    not trying to get in your stuff, just trying to educate you, and the people that dont know.
     
  11. Dec 28, 2012 at 10:07 PM
    #31
    Krazie Sj

    Krazie Sj [OP] Resident Jackass

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Member:
    #9849
    Messages:
    13,496
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Power Serge
    LV-426 (Acheron)
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Off Road 4x4
    Borla Catback Exhaust, Airaid Short Ram Intake, 285x75R16 Mickey Thompson MTZs, 16" Konig Countersteer rims, ARB Bumper, All Pro LT w/Walker Evan Shocks front and back, All Pro expedition leaf pack, 10,000lb Superwinch, Intake Manifold Spacer, Bed Rack with ARB RTT, Rotopack and Hi Lift mounted, Husky Liner mats and an air freshener from 1995.
  12. Dec 28, 2012 at 10:23 PM
    #32
    whiteneck

    whiteneck Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    Member:
    #92675
    Messages:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Michael
    Oakville, ON
    Vehicle:
    02 V6 Stepside TRD 5-speed manual

    I appreciate this, 6spd.

    I agree with you on the depth of field and crop frame stuff.

    As far as S vs. IS goes, I realize I was mistaken regarding what that S stood for.

    I'm now questioning if the lens lengths for the S lenses take into account a crop-sensor. My understanding was that they didn't.

    Thanks for the info...this is helpful.
     
  13. Dec 28, 2012 at 10:24 PM
    #33
    JWinTN

    JWinTN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2012
    Member:
    #81764
    Messages:
    49
    Gender:
    Male
    E TN
    Vehicle:
    2012 TRD Off Road
    I started with primes—a 28/1.8, a 50/1.4, and the 100/2.8 macro. Then I got the Tamron 17-50/2.8 for the constant aperture and the convenience of the zoom when shooting pics of the kid. I'll next be trying to acquire some type of constant aperture zoom in the 70-200mm range.

    Once you get used to having the low-light capabilities, the sharpness and image quality, and the shallow DOF of fast lenses, the variable aperture zooms don't cut it so well. Changing lenses can be a pain, but I walked around with only the 50/1.4 for a long time before I got any other lenses.

    I'm also intrigued by the 40mm pancake lens and would like to try it, I just don't need it enough to justify the purchase. It looks like it would be a good place to start on a budget.
     
  14. Dec 28, 2012 at 10:29 PM
    #34
    MightyMouse-SCT

    MightyMouse-SCT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Member:
    #44862
    Messages:
    15,508
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Gabriel
    O'SIDE CA
    Vehicle:
    MightyMouse-SCT - 2011 LT 4x4 Desert Runner
    Long Travel Total chaos kit, fox shocks, smp fab , dmz sua, glassworks, method wheels.
    Did you get the camera from future ?
     
  15. Dec 28, 2012 at 10:34 PM
    #35
    MightyMouse-SCT

    MightyMouse-SCT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Member:
    #44862
    Messages:
    15,508
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Gabriel
    O'SIDE CA
    Vehicle:
    MightyMouse-SCT - 2011 LT 4x4 Desert Runner
    Long Travel Total chaos kit, fox shocks, smp fab , dmz sua, glassworks, method wheels.
    Go with either the 2nd or 3rd lens . My bundle came with the second lens and the 18-135 . Does good for me right now .
     
  16. Dec 29, 2012 at 11:35 AM
    #36
    Krazie Sj

    Krazie Sj [OP] Resident Jackass

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Member:
    #9849
    Messages:
    13,496
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Power Serge
    LV-426 (Acheron)
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Off Road 4x4
    Borla Catback Exhaust, Airaid Short Ram Intake, 285x75R16 Mickey Thompson MTZs, 16" Konig Countersteer rims, ARB Bumper, All Pro LT w/Walker Evan Shocks front and back, All Pro expedition leaf pack, 10,000lb Superwinch, Intake Manifold Spacer, Bed Rack with ARB RTT, Rotopack and Hi Lift mounted, Husky Liner mats and an air freshener from 1995.
    Yes I got it from futureshop. It was an open box with 180 shots done on it. I know a few places had them on for that much as well, but it's far easier to find a Futureshop than a Vistek.
     
  17. Dec 29, 2012 at 11:38 AM
    #37
    benbacher

    benbacher Purveyor of Fun Vendor

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Member:
    #59032
    Messages:
    8,200
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    ^
    Anchorage, AK
    Vehicle:
    '10 Tacoma 4x4 LBDC SR5 TRD Sport
    Too many to list now.
    I got my 5d mk ii for about that price with only 1500 actuations. Could not pass that up. I think a buddy of mine might be selling a 7d if anyone's interested.
     
  18. Dec 31, 2012 at 7:38 AM
    #38
    Krazie Sj

    Krazie Sj [OP] Resident Jackass

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Member:
    #9849
    Messages:
    13,496
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Power Serge
    LV-426 (Acheron)
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Off Road 4x4
    Borla Catback Exhaust, Airaid Short Ram Intake, 285x75R16 Mickey Thompson MTZs, 16" Konig Countersteer rims, ARB Bumper, All Pro LT w/Walker Evan Shocks front and back, All Pro expedition leaf pack, 10,000lb Superwinch, Intake Manifold Spacer, Bed Rack with ARB RTT, Rotopack and Hi Lift mounted, Husky Liner mats and an air freshener from 1995.
    [​IMG]

    It is done...
     
To Top