1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

91 Octane - ECT Test

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by Docoma Pro, Feb 14, 2018.

  1. Feb 15, 2018 at 5:18 AM
    #21
    Dorag

    Dorag Do Rag

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2015
    Member:
    #173165
    Messages:
    44
    Vehicle:
    TRD off road 4x4
    I tried ethanol free gas and higher octane gas. At first there is a difference. But after time 4-6 weeks the computer figures it out and goes back to what you had before ie same mph and performance. so it don't matter. In the long run the truck will overall be with 87 oct reg gas.
     
  2. Feb 15, 2018 at 6:47 AM
    #22
    greengs

    greengs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2015
    Member:
    #166550
    Messages:
    1,123
    Gender:
    Male
    AB, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2022 Tacoma Pro, 2023 Gladiator Mojave, 89 W126
    Engineering Explained guy does a fairly thorough test on dyno with a bunch of different vehicles with premium and regular. Really there isn't much of a case for premium unless you're towing or your engine knocks while driving on regular.

     
    MOC221_ and taco2010trd like this.
  3. Feb 15, 2018 at 7:00 AM
    #23
    Docoma Pro

    Docoma Pro [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2018
    Member:
    #241016
    Messages:
    166
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ken
    Rochester, NY
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tacoma TRD Pro Cavalry Blue
    OVtuned 1.05 93 Perf,Undercover Elite LX, Subaru/Kicker tweeters
    So I'm not batshit crazy? On the way into work this morning I left the ECT off, so just rode in on 91 octane. Still felt better, smoother. Maybe my 4 previous fill-ups were just shitty 87, as I went to a different station for the ethanol-free 91. In any event, I appreciate the feedback everyone!
     
  4. Feb 15, 2018 at 7:12 AM
    #24
    TTM556

    TTM556 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Member:
    #243317
    Messages:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Stock Taco Double Cab
    Stock
    I run 91 non ethanol in my F150 along with a 91 performance 5* tune. It does make a difference power wise compared to the 87 performance tune.

    I thought I read in the manual that you are not supposed to run 87 or higher and nothing over E15 in these trucks?
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2018
  5. Feb 15, 2018 at 7:28 AM
    #25
    freeriderchad108

    freeriderchad108 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Member:
    #180200
    Messages:
    467
    Gender:
    Male
    Boston
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tacoma TRD Sport Silver
    A few minor things...
    Octane is just a rating to tell you how much "pre-bang" resistance gas has. A lower compression engine (like the one in our trucks) will run just fine on 87 octane. If you have a high compression engine (or are running boost) then you NEED to run higher octane to combat pre-ignition. Pre-ignition is when the gas/air mix in the cylinder detonates before it should (i.e. before the piston has finished it's stroke during the compression stage). This causes a lot of problems.

    If you mess with timing and create more compression (atkins cycle actually lets some "intake" fuel/air mix out of the cylinder during compression to make the engine compress less volume, is more efficient) you will need more octane. I'm not sure what the tuning these guys do (if they change valve timing) but it would be worth it for me just to have peace of mind to have higher octane.

    Can't comment on ethanol content. I know ethanol/alcohol burns cooler than gasoline so you can use more of it along with more air (turbo/supercharger) and get more bang-per-volume while not melting stuff in your engine as quickly.
     
  6. Feb 15, 2018 at 8:18 AM
    #26
    Ram.95

    Ram.95 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Member:
    #236782
    Messages:
    185
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2017 Black Tacoma TRD OR 4x4 Dallas Tx
    TRD PRO Bilstein Suspension HS Progressive AAL
    Great post, enjoyed watching the video.
     
  7. Feb 15, 2018 at 8:27 AM
    #27
    adk_tacoma

    adk_tacoma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2017
    Member:
    #226289
    Messages:
    908
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joe
    Waterford, NY
    Vehicle:
    2016 quicksand tacoma sr5
    Westin outdoors man winch brush guard, custom switch board, Custom machined tow hooks, 255/85/r16 tires, trd shocks and struts, oba in bed cubby, ladder rack, JDUB skid plate
    stewart's gas is better IMO. I think my truck does run better on 91 non-ethanol from them. I tried 1 tank of 87 after never running anything less than 91 and the truck felt sluggish, my mpg readout was lower for that tank to (25 on 91, 20 on 87)
     
    okichewy1 likes this.
  8. Feb 15, 2018 at 8:30 AM
    #28
    ElGatoLoco

    ElGatoLoco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2016
    Member:
    #204285
    Messages:
    524
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '17 DCSB TRD Sport
    Save your money and get 87/89
     
    taco2010trd likes this.
  9. Feb 15, 2018 at 8:31 AM
    #29
    taco2010trd

    taco2010trd Cyber Bully

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    Member:
    #76977
    Messages:
    2,367
    Gender:
    Male
    Tampa, Florida
    Vehicle:
    2010 Silver TRD OR DCSB
    This
     
  10. Feb 15, 2018 at 8:44 AM
    #30
    splitbolt

    splitbolt Voodoo Witch Doctor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Member:
    #32761
    Messages:
    7,858
    Gender:
    Male
    NW Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD OFFROAD DCSB MGM
    I'm a fan of his videos as well.

    What I'd like to see, is a comparison involving:
    -various octanes of E0 vs E10 fuels
    -summer vs winter blends
    -delivered through a high-pressure delivery system
    -under cold and hot conditions

    I'm curious about vaporization and cavitation characteristics under those conditions.
     
  11. Feb 15, 2018 at 8:51 AM
    #31
    Docoma Pro

    Docoma Pro [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2018
    Member:
    #241016
    Messages:
    166
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ken
    Rochester, NY
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tacoma TRD Pro Cavalry Blue
    OVtuned 1.05 93 Perf,Undercover Elite LX, Subaru/Kicker tweeters
    Good to know my fellow Upstate New Yorker.
     
  12. Feb 15, 2018 at 2:57 PM
    #32
    Barcared

    Barcared Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Member:
    #192477
    Messages:
    441
    Gender:
    Male
    Philadelphia, PA
    Vehicle:
    2016 Barcelona Red TRDOR RIP. 2020 MGM TRD OR.
    Or, just run multiple regression afterwards. Or...could run a principle components analysis followed by an independent component analysis to identify the unique variable. :D

    Just saying. Then, the results are so muddled, you can tell the reader whatever the hell you want because they are so confused.
     
    weefek and hiPSI[QUOTED] like this.
  13. Feb 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM
    #33
    dinglehoser

    dinglehoser Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Member:
    #218053
    Messages:
    61
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD OR AC SW JDM YO
    I vaguely recall someone logging ignition timing on the stock tune with 93 vs 87 and there was actually a modest, but consistent, difference in peak advance at some throttle openings and rev ranges. I don't remember the details ... makes me want to run some data-centric experiments of my own, since I've also noticed a (subjective) difference between the two.
     
    MOC221_ likes this.
  14. Feb 15, 2018 at 3:53 PM
    #34
    hiPSI

    hiPSI Laminar Flow

    Joined:
    May 21, 2017
    Member:
    #219544
    Messages:
    12,121
    Gender:
    Male
    South Carolina
    Vehicle:
    2024 Long Tundra
    Wide. Open. Throttle. If you continually run the higher octane, you will see a few more HP at WOT. True statement.
     
  15. Feb 15, 2018 at 4:13 PM
    #35
    weefek

    weefek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2017
    Member:
    #210135
    Messages:
    226
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    J
    Vehicle:
    2017 OR ACLB
    Engineering Explained is a bit of a twat and can we for the LOVE OF GOD screw off with all the octane 'rumor' nonsense , if you don't know what octane ratings are / mean at this point in life you probably never will
     
  16. May 28, 2018 at 9:01 AM
    #36
    bnv

    bnv Boy I say, use CRAWL to sneak up on that dawg!

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2016
    Member:
    #176740
    Messages:
    536
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bruce
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    2016 Access Cab TRD Off Road 4X4 Quick Sand
    Kings adj, TC UCA, Zeon 10s, PB bumper, BD 30" light bar, BD cornering lights, Line-X Grill, Wheels, Tires Duratracs, tint, gate lettering, glove box lettering, ARB compressor

    Octane is Latin for partial horse power.

    So if you have 87 Octaines that = 1 Horse Power per gallon.

    Tacoma 21 gallons x 87 octanes= 1827 total Octanes.
    So 1827 / 6 cylinders = 304 hp.

    Tacoma 21 gallons X 91 octanes =1911 total Octanes.
    So 1911 / 6 cylinders = 318 hp.

    Thus. 91 octanes = 14 more hp than 87 octane.


    Basic GED math.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2018
    hiPSI likes this.
  17. May 28, 2018 at 11:13 AM
    #37
    Ronzio

    Ronzio Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2018
    Member:
    #245114
    Messages:
    2,719
    Gender:
    Male
    Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    17 DCSB TRDOR
    Higher octane fuels burn slower than lower octane fuels. They cost more because they are refined more...a claim of increased horsepower and fuel mileage is more mental than factual on a computer controlled vehicle. Octane is a measurement of the efficiency of fuel blend expressed as a ratio relative to the efficiency of pure hydrocarbon.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top