AT to MT mpg difference?

I went from 22 1/2 MPG stock to 17 1/2 with the Nitto Trail Grapplers. I love the Trail Grapplers. They have a hum and are not loud when driving. My Tundra has the Nitto Ridge Grapplers and its too new for me to calculate the MPG. The drive and sound is the same with the Ridge Grapplers and Trail Grapplers. My Trail Grapplers have 54,000 miles on them and have half the tread left. I didn't buy the tires for economy.

 

What size did you go to?

Seems like a decent loss, must be bigger...

 

Superbadass tires.

These things hook up and power through the mud, muck, dirt, sand and stuff that I've tried 'em in.

They haven't been objectionably loud.

I have put 4,000 miles on mine....they went on my Taco to replace the factory Destination LE tires. They are E-rated beasts that weigh ~ 20lbs more per tire. I was concerned about the impact to my fuel economy before doing so. Now....not a big issue. I've noticed and average of -2 mpg difference over the LE tires which would have been worthless to me when hunting season gets here.

I've driven the Destination AT on my last 3 4x4 trucks and never had an offroad problem with them and they each lasted well over 50,000 miles. I was going to put a set on of them on my Taco.....but I wanted something different this time and went with the Destination MT2. They look great to me...and the performance offroad has certainly been exceptional.






















A great looking AT that's lighter would certainly be all I really need.....but I'm enjoying these for now.

 

I knew I couldnt be the only one with these tires...

I love mine as well..

Much better than a duratrac IMO... I've had a TON of duratracs...