1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Better MPG - 235 E or 265 C ?

Discussion in 'Wheels & Tires' started by mccarroll, Oct 19, 2012.

  1. Oct 19, 2012 at 7:45 AM
    #1
    mccarroll

    mccarroll [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Member:
    #82742
    Messages:
    186
    Gender:
    Male
    Newfoundland, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2012 DC 4X4
    So like the title says, which tire would produce better gas mileage? A 235/85/16 in an E or a 265/75/16 in a C assuming they are the same brand & model?

    I am thinking about duratracs, but please do not let this turn into a skinny vs wide discussion. Just mileage. :)
     
  2. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:07 AM
    #2
    mccarroll

    mccarroll [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Member:
    #82742
    Messages:
    186
    Gender:
    Male
    Newfoundland, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2012 DC 4X4
    Seriously, 54 views and nobody has an opinion on this? :eek:
     
  3. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:31 AM
    #3
    Pugga

    Pugga Pasti-Dip Free Since 1983

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Member:
    #39131
    Messages:
    28,792
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    '13 Ford F-150 SCREW
    F-150 Mod
    Assuming they are the same load range and tread pattern, I would put good money on the 235's getting better mileage although I'm not sure you'll find any that are C rated. Usually the tall, narrow truck tires are D or E rated. That being said, I still think the 235's might be a little better.
     
  4. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:38 AM
    #4
    TenBeers

    TenBeers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Member:
    #18067
    Messages:
    1,864
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rich
    Wildwood, MO
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB TRD Off Road Magnetic Gray
    Factory Roof Rack, Westin Tube Steps, AVS Bugflector and Wind Deflectors, RideRite Air Bags, Custom Bed Rack, CVT Roof-Top Tent, Weathertech Floor Mats, Redline Hood Supports, Pop-N-Lock Tailgate Lock, some stickers
    I think it may depend on the kind of driving you do. I am assuming that the E-rated are significantly heavier than the E-rated.

    If you do more city driving or more stop and go, the 265 C-rated may give you better mileage since they are lighter and easier to get moving and stop moving, and they would provide more resistance on the highway.

    If you do mostly highway driving, once moving, the heavier tires will want to keep moving, and being narrower they would provide less resistance.

    But this is all a guess based on simple physics.
     
  5. Oct 19, 2012 at 8:31 PM
    #5
    Yamaha Dave

    Yamaha Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Member:
    #34080
    Messages:
    2,664
    Gender:
    Male
    Assuming you go with Duratracs here are some specs.


    235/85/16 Duratrac (Load range E) tires weighs 51 lbs each.

    265/75/16 Duratrac (Load range C) tires weighs 45 lbs each.


    So although the Load Range Es will have less contact patch on the road, they will be 24 lbs. heavier than the Load Cs. This rolling weight along with other variables such as tread and compound is what contribute to the decline of your gas mileage.

    265/75/16s will give better gas mileage.
     
  6. Oct 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM
    #6
    BuzzardsGottaEat

    BuzzardsGottaEat "Pick up some speed.. You'll make it."

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Member:
    #55669
    Messages:
    5,637
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chaz
    Nebraska/South Dakota
    Vehicle:
    93 Pickup 4x4 [22R-E] 5MT
    OME suspension, LCE Performance parts, Konigs, etc. [see build]
    That's 24 extra lbs to get rolling. I'd wager that takes a toll in town in stop and go but on the highway may pan out since they are much skinnier.

    Do you do more city or highway?
     
  7. Oct 20, 2012 at 7:22 AM
    #7
    mccarroll

    mccarroll [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Member:
    #82742
    Messages:
    186
    Gender:
    Male
    Newfoundland, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2012 DC 4X4
    Mostly city driving for me. I think this settles it. I prefer the look of the 265s anyhow i think.
     
  8. Oct 20, 2012 at 11:06 PM
    #8
    GuapOh

    GuapOh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Member:
    #53345
    Messages:
    447
    Gender:
    Male
    Nor Cal
    Vehicle:
    2011 SR5 4x4 MT
    Skid Plate, Hood Protector, Wheel Locks, Snugtop XV, Yakima Rack, Weathertechs, Sick Speed Shifter, Avid Bumper, Avid Sliders, Bilstien 5100's, TSB Spring packs
    Heavier tires are gonna destroy your mileage. I have 2 complete sets of wheels and tires, both on OE OR wheels so there is no difference there. Stock Dungflops = 22 MPG average. E Rated Toyo MT 265/75's (10 ply tires) = 17 average. I run the high mileage tires in spring and summer and the heavy ones for fall and winter (hunting and skiing) seasons.
     
To Top