CA sucks!! Passed law!!

So if you're a resident of sunny CA and you give a flying flick about this, you've already sent a polite message to gov. Brown requesting a veto, right?

Not really interested in what non CA residents think...

 

i dont get so excited carrying a non loaded weapon..but i do think we need to "hold the line".

so i did write the gov..my boss. hope he doesnt fire my ass.

 

Its a license and not a permit, or you can open carry without a license.

 

you do realize you can be carrying ammo in a clip or speed loader, right?

 

well if subject of the queen= free then i guess so.... youre definitely not sovereign only the queen is. but you do have your rights enumerated in the Magna Carta (US follows too since we use English common law till our independence) and what ever you have rights/charters enumerated in

 

Wrong century

 

i got my PA LTCF i got it right before you stopped having to appear in person and no fingerprints or picture were required just 26$ and a copy of my GA GWCL

 

open carry is legal for a lot more places in Michigan...kind of like how its illegal to CC into a bank in NC but its 100% legal to OC

 

yea..that doesnt do it for me. i dont want a utility belt full of gun and magazines. i just would love a legal concealed carry.

tiny .38 in a front pocket. i dont need the "statement" of walking around strapped.

 

whats wrong about the century?

so the queen isnt your queen eh? she she is on your looneys and tooneys or what not...the Union Jack flies over govt buildings etc

 

are you stupid ?

 

nope i took pics of the union jack and the maple leaf flag flying over some provincial buildings in Toronto on my trip a few weeks ago...while you may have a Parliament she is still your sovereign and could abolish your form of government it is truly dependent on her will...but why would you she gets kick backs and they run the show

 

Was it during the Royal visit perhaps ?

 

no its was august 11-15 was there a royal visit then? i went to omemee ad peterbourough, lindsay and toronto. ate tons of poutine
downtown peterbourough at the whistlestop

 

No , it was earlier in the summer

IDK

 

That is not entirely true. She acts as essentially as a head of state and does not have the political power abolish the government. She is granted the title more so as a dignitary. England released ownership of Canada after WWII I believe. A quick Wikki search would probably gather more info..

 

There is a similar sentiment from the rest of us.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Canada#Monarchy

sounds like youre a subject....she is your sovereign.... but it is a wiki article but its also what ive learned from other places

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_Canada

 

This is one of the most unexpected threadjackings ever....