1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Engine Options for the tacoma?

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by myname150, Jul 27, 2010.

?

Which Engine Would You Like In the Tacoma?

  1. Tundra's 5.7L V8 / Standard

    4.6%
  2. Tundra's 5.7L V8 / Optional

    12.3%
  3. Tundra's 4.6L V8 / Standard

    3.1%
  4. Tundra's 4.6L V8 / Optional

    13.9%
  5. 4Runner's New (270HP) 4.0L V6 / Standard

    9.7%
  6. 4Runner's New (270HP) 4.0L V6 / Optional

    4.2%
  7. FJ Cruiser's (260HP) 4.0L V6 / Standard

    1.1%
  8. FJ Cruiser's (260HP) 4.0 V6 / Optional

    0.5%
  9. Hilux's 2.5L D-4D / Standard

    1.5%
  10. Hilux's 2.5L D-4D / Optional

    2.0%
  11. Hilux's 3.0L D-4D / Standard

    7.5%
  12. Hilux's 3.0L D-4D / Optional

    22.4%
  13. I am happy with the current engine in the tacoma.

    9.8%
  14. The current engine is good, but could use improvements. Such as Dual VVT-i

    4.6%
  15. Other

    2.5%
  1. Jul 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM
    #21
    myname150

    myname150 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Member:
    #39827
    Messages:
    1,354
    Gender:
    Male
    id have to disagree. i like having a bigger truck, but not going fullsize.

    Maybe the tacoma can get smaller and then toyota can introduce the hilux! :D
     
  2. Jul 28, 2010 at 10:24 AM
    #22
    steve o 77

    steve o 77 braaap

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Member:
    #26726
    Messages:
    19,917
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Steven
    In a corn field, OH
    Vehicle:
    1990 Chevy Siveraydo
    245k+ miles, rust, working AC, bald eagles
    That would be fine, they just need to make a small size again.
     
  3. Jul 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM
    #23
    awoit

    awoit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2007
    Member:
    #3639
    Messages:
    495
    Gender:
    Male
    CA
    Vehicle:
    08 TRD, SR5
    could someone explain what Dual VVT-i is/does exactly...
     
  4. Jul 28, 2010 at 11:11 AM
    #24
    TacomaBuzz

    TacomaBuzz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Member:
    #32764
    Messages:
    1,156
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    CT
    Vehicle:
    2014 RegCab 4x4 TX Special Edition
    Sirius, Bugflector,back-rack, stepsides.
    4.6L V8 Would be ideal. The 2nd gen Tacoma is proportionate to the 1st Gen tundra therefore it shouldn't be an issue. The 4.0L is a powerful engine but i think the added power of the 4.6 would outweigh the disadvantage of a VERY SLIGHT drop in MPG.
     
  5. Jul 28, 2010 at 11:37 AM
    #25
    PB65stang

    PB65stang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Member:
    #26900
    Messages:
    1,723
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Patrick
    Kansas City
    Vehicle:
    2016 F150 Lariat 4x4
    5100s (2.5" front), OEM Raptor wheels, 315/70/17 BFGs, Undercover, tint, Weathertechs.
    I don't have anything to add here in terms of durability, because this is spot on. But an additional point - what would Toyota get out of including the 5.7 as an option? All of the R&D, testing, etc. that would go with this, all to simply take sales away from a Tundra? Despite what 10% of the 1% of Tacoma owners that are on this site think, the 5.7 would not sell well enough in the Tacoma to justify it. That's why you have different classes of vehicle. You want to tow so much that you need a 5.7 liter V8 engine, but want smaller? Fine, get a Tundra Double Cab (not CrewMax). If you're going to be towing that much and need the power, you're going to be just as, if not more, thankful for the larger truck and stronger frame the Tundra offers.
     
  6. Jul 28, 2010 at 12:00 PM
    #26
    jandrews

    jandrews Hootin' and Hollerin'

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18122
    Messages:
    16,432
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 FourDubDee TRD OR
    A-TRUCK, Fat Kid in the Bed, Custom Pinstriping, Ported and Polished Muffler Bearing, Hi-Performance Bed Mat
    All aluminum and with 50% more displacement, meaning in all likelihood fluid capacities would increase, adding weight there. Whether or not the engine mounts in the taco frame can handle an additional 150lbs. is an another question.

    It's just stupid. The Taco is so light you'd spin half that extra power out of the rear wheels and be buying tires every 10,000 miles. The nose-heavy, power rich configuration would be perfect for people to get the truck going screaming fast, then hit a pothole or bump in the road, dig the nose on a top-heavy vehicle and start rolling.

    The 5.7L makes no sense in this vehicle. For it to make sense, you have to modify the vehicle so extensively it's easy to make the argument it's not a Tacoma anymore. You could *make* it work with less, but it'd be a half-assed, slapshod job that didn't use any of the components to their potential.


    Upping the horsepower numbers would likely require shifting the torque curve higher up in the rev range. I'd rather have the torque earlier, torque matters more for trucks anyway. People are hot to trot on turbo-diesels with like 150 hp because the torque numbers are so high and arrive early.

    The added weight and power for towing wouldn't be a very welcome addition without a new frame.

    You're right on the gas mileage being better than a Tundra, but it would still be worse than the 4.0L at equal revs. More cylinders, more valves, more gas.
     
  7. Jul 28, 2010 at 12:16 PM
    #27
    PB65stang

    PB65stang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Member:
    #26900
    Messages:
    1,723
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Patrick
    Kansas City
    Vehicle:
    2016 F150 Lariat 4x4
    5100s (2.5" front), OEM Raptor wheels, 315/70/17 BFGs, Undercover, tint, Weathertechs.
    I love voices of reason in a thread like this!
     
  8. Jul 28, 2010 at 12:20 PM
    #28
    jandrews

    jandrews Hootin' and Hollerin'

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18122
    Messages:
    16,432
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 FourDubDee TRD OR
    A-TRUCK, Fat Kid in the Bed, Custom Pinstriping, Ported and Polished Muffler Bearing, Hi-Performance Bed Mat

    x123456789

    One of the most common factors I see in this forum, as great as it is, is a poor understanding of how changing one component in a vehicle changes so many factors that other components are engineered and designed around.
     
  9. Jul 28, 2010 at 12:36 PM
    #29
    Pugga

    Pugga Pasti-Dip Free 1983 - 2015... It was a good run

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Member:
    #39131
    Messages:
    38,693
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    '19 Ford F-250 6.7 SCrew
    F-250 Land Yacht Mod
    True, but I'd be more than willing to bet the V8 handles a heavy trailer much better than the I-5. A light tow vehicle is much more apt to be pushed around by the trailer it is towing. I wasn't talking about being able to tow more with a V8, just tow at the upper limit of the Tacoma's capacity more comfortably.
     
  10. Jul 28, 2010 at 1:39 PM
    #30
    81shark

    81shark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Member:
    #10567
    Messages:
    4,079
    Gender:
    Male

    oil is already high in the I4 at 6 liters. nothing to add there. maybe an extra gallon in the radiator. maybe a little bigger radiator. maybe a little more transmission fluid. but still, lets say it added 200 lbs. i'm still not conviced you would have to add a ton of weight.

    and yeah, it would be overkill just like a super charged V6 or a vette, or a F150 with the upgraded backage, or the ram with the upgraded package. not really usefull, but still cool and fun.
     
  11. Jul 28, 2010 at 1:56 PM
    #31
    BigRedToy

    BigRedToy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Member:
    #15885
    Messages:
    2,269
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    07 Regular Cab SR5 4x4
    ^^
    4.6L V8, Access Cab, Factory long travel, Raptor killer. :D
     
  12. Jul 28, 2010 at 2:37 PM
    #32
    jandrews

    jandrews Hootin' and Hollerin'

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18122
    Messages:
    16,432
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 FourDubDee TRD OR
    A-TRUCK, Fat Kid in the Bed, Custom Pinstriping, Ported and Polished Muffler Bearing, Hi-Performance Bed Mat
    See, that's the thing though, it really WOULDN'T be fun until you changed a lot of other things, because otherwise you wouldn't be able to turn that power into things that matter, like acceleration.

    Pony Cars, Supercars, and roadsters all have relatively large engines (compared to size) because they have suspension, tires and weight distributions designed for that type of engine output. It's all engineered together. Trucks do not, especially not swapping something as monstrous as the 3UR (which is, technologically, the most significant leap forward for V8s since the Hemi) into a mid-sized platform meant to do half as much of all things.
     
  13. Jul 29, 2010 at 9:42 AM
    #33
    myname150

    myname150 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Member:
    #39827
    Messages:
    1,354
    Gender:
    Male
    Hahahah Amen to that! :D
     
  14. Jul 30, 2010 at 8:38 AM
    #34
    TacomaBuzz

    TacomaBuzz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Member:
    #32764
    Messages:
    1,156
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    CT
    Vehicle:
    2014 RegCab 4x4 TX Special Edition
    Sirius, Bugflector,back-rack, stepsides.
    x2, well said!!
     
  15. Jul 30, 2010 at 11:31 AM
    #35
    Bart

    Bart Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Member:
    #4512
    Messages:
    273
    Franklin,NC
    Vehicle:
    08 TRD OFFROAD V6 4x4
    metra ipod
    When my 4.0 dies I am stuffing a 4.6 or 4.7 tundra motor in it. There's not much hp difference I think 40hp more but it's the displacement I want for towing.
     
  16. Jul 30, 2010 at 12:53 PM
    #36
    81shark

    81shark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Member:
    #10567
    Messages:
    4,079
    Gender:
    Male
    yes, you have to make changes, yes, you have to beef up parts, but it's not that big of deal. beef up the front suspension (a arms, shocks, springs, sway bar), transmission, 3rd member, and rear suspension. mabye add a rear sway bar. bigger brakes, rims and tires. yeah, it'd be a little more weight and cost, but it would a pretty bad ass truck.

    but i agree, i would prefer that performance in a car. the trucks wheel base is to long to do anything but straight line. it's so friggen tight in the corners.
     
  17. Jul 30, 2010 at 9:49 PM
    #37
    StandingCow

    StandingCow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2009
    Member:
    #16373
    Messages:
    1,792
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    NJ
    Vehicle:
    09 SR5 4x4 V6 access cab
    Hilux's 3.0L D-4D / Optional
     
  18. Jul 31, 2010 at 5:46 AM
    #38
    oofy15354

    oofy15354 Proud Tundra *****

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Member:
    #25311
    Messages:
    510
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dave
    Massachusetts
    Herculiner, Access Tonneau, Uniden cb, firestik antennae, Bosch Wipers, JVC Ipod headunit, Boston Acoustic Speakers
    i think its nice to hope for a V8 in the tacoma but i dont see it ever happening. with toyotas reputation for good gas mileage, i dont see people other than truck enthusiasts celebrating a "gas guzzling" engine in a "small" truck.

    most importantly though, it would definitely impact tundra sales as less people who want the V8 would justify the added expense of a tundra just to get one. itd be a delicate balance with low towing numbers at best

    i do think a special edition with a 4.6L V8 would be something thats possible. maybe a new x-runner or something (maybe even supercharged). or a famous person edition (like the ivan steward tundra) but that would certainly carry a hefty premium
     
  19. Jul 31, 2010 at 8:59 AM
    #39
    Barnone

    Barnone Guest

    Hilux's 3.0L D-4D / Optional
    My ex Dodge 4x4 Cummings diesel auto regular cab got 20-21MPG towing or whatever.
     
  20. Jul 31, 2010 at 12:14 PM
    #40
    2.7taco

    2.7taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    Member:
    #27316
    Messages:
    953
    Gender:
    Male
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    2005 Tan Tacoma Base 5 LUG: Beaten , abused and still running strong.
    Fat Bobs 2.75 lift and level with short AAL, 16x8 Level 8 Guardian Wheels, 245/75R16 Toyo Open Country ATII, custom trans shift kit(home made), Trans temp. and Vac gauge, URD fuel pump upgrade(going back to stock soon).
    Diesel would be the way to go. Its more efficient and produces better performance all around.

    Hopefully a TOYOTA Rep. is looking at this poll maybe they can offer it in their new truck in the future. I know over 25 of my friends would grab their keys and head for a trade-in if the 3.0L D-4D was offered even as an option.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top