1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

engine power.

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by jbandt, May 15, 2012.

  1. May 15, 2012 at 9:59 AM
    #1
    jbandt

    jbandt [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Member:
    #78822
    Messages:
    54
    Gender:
    Male
    Hey guys. I've been thinking about a compact truck as a daily commuter, preferably a Toyota as I already have an fj. I'd like to get a RC, 4cy, 5 speed with ac. I'm concerned about overall power and acceleration. I'm more interested in getting something older. Question is what motor is going to have the better acceleration? Should I go with the older 2.4 or go with the newer 2.7? I used to have a Nissan frontier xe extra cab and it was a little under powered for my taste. I believe it had a 2.5 l motor in it. I should mention that I would even consider the older Toyota pickups if the power is adequate. Just looking for some opinions here and any suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. May 15, 2012 at 10:01 AM
    #2
    BrokenTusk

    BrokenTusk I support a velociraptor free workplace.

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Member:
    #36607
    Messages:
    31,974
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Marcelasaurus
    AB, Canada
    Vehicle:
    The Scarlett Whore
    Check Build Thread!!
    If your itching for power, then you'll have to get the V6. The I4 is great for regular driving and minimal towing and fuel efficiency, thats about it.
     
  3. May 15, 2012 at 10:13 AM
    #3
    whippersnapper02

    whippersnapper02 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Member:
    #27905
    Messages:
    35,214
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Christian
    Yorba Linda, CA
    Vehicle:
    10 MGM TRD OR 4wd Auto DCSB
    Banks Monster Exhaust, Pop n Lock tailgate lock, Hook-Ups tie down brackets, USA Spec Ipod adaptor, WO seat covers, color matched grill with Grillcraft insert, Tuffy locking bed box
    4 bangers and power usually can't be used in the same sentence.:D
     
  4. May 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM
    #4
    1980

    1980 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Member:
    #35307
    Messages:
    717
    Gender:
    Male
    The Dust Bowl
    The V6 in the Tacoma is the same as the one in the FJ, Though the 2.7 L is OK in the Tacoma, you will notice a lot of difference between it and the 4.0 L V6 (I've had trucks with both). I also actually get better mileage with my V6 than I did with the 4 cyl. I'm pretty sure the reason for this is that with the 4-cyl I was always having to downshift and run the engine at high rpms to maintain highway speed in the mountains.
     
  5. May 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM
    #5
    knucklehead

    knucklehead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Member:
    #77990
    Messages:
    273
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Ottawa
    Vehicle:
    SR5 4x4
    Hitch, nav header
    There are THREE 4-cyl engines available with tacoma.
    2.4
    Old 2.7
    New 2.7 (2005+)

    The only one I'm familiar with is the new 2.7, and its a hell of an engine. Rated 159 hp, under the "new" way of calculating. It was rated 165 hp the old way. The old 2.7 was rated 150 hp, obviously compare that with the 165. Torque is awesome on these, thanks to VVT-i.

    With that engine and a manual transmission, you are left with no wants, unless your objective is purely racing (in which case, why a truck???)
     
  6. May 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM
    #6
    jbandt

    jbandt [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Member:
    #78822
    Messages:
    54
    Gender:
    Male
    No racing, but I am a bit aggressive from a stop. I'd like to feel confident that I could get up to speed when merging onto the highway or pass in a reasonable distance. I know that power and mpg's aren't used in the same sentence. I was just wondering if there is a noticeable difference in power between the 2.4 and 2.7 engines.
     
  7. May 15, 2012 at 12:29 PM
    #7
    BrokenTusk

    BrokenTusk I support a velociraptor free workplace.

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Member:
    #36607
    Messages:
    31,974
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Marcelasaurus
    AB, Canada
    Vehicle:
    The Scarlett Whore
    Check Build Thread!!
    Getting up to speeds the 2.7L will be fine, as far as highway passing goes, it leaves much to be desired and takes forever. Thats just my opinion though, for me, the V6 was decent enough at passing, but I supercharged it to increase its power.
     
  8. May 15, 2012 at 12:37 PM
    #8
    whippersnapper02

    whippersnapper02 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Member:
    #27905
    Messages:
    35,214
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Christian
    Yorba Linda, CA
    Vehicle:
    10 MGM TRD OR 4wd Auto DCSB
    Banks Monster Exhaust, Pop n Lock tailgate lock, Hook-Ups tie down brackets, USA Spec Ipod adaptor, WO seat covers, color matched grill with Grillcraft insert, Tuffy locking bed box
    8 horse and 17 lbft difference between the 4 bangers.
     
  9. May 15, 2012 at 1:58 PM
    #9
    knucklehead

    knucklehead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Member:
    #77990
    Messages:
    273
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Ottawa
    Vehicle:
    SR5 4x4
    Hitch, nav header
    That's between the 2.4 and the OLD 2.7
    Which are respectively 142 and 150.

    The NEW 2.7, as I've stated, is 15 hp on top of the OLD 2.7 (completely new engine with nothing in common). That, on the same scale as the 2.4 and old 2.7, would be 165 hp.

    Or you could scale the old engines back to 136 and 145. Either way, the 2TR-FE is a *FAR* more powerful engine.
     
  10. May 15, 2012 at 1:59 PM
    #10
    knucklehead

    knucklehead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Member:
    #77990
    Messages:
    273
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Ottawa
    Vehicle:
    SR5 4x4
    Hitch, nav header
    You afraid of dropping it to 3rd?
     
  11. May 15, 2012 at 2:00 PM
    #11
    whippersnapper02

    whippersnapper02 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Member:
    #27905
    Messages:
    35,214
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Christian
    Yorba Linda, CA
    Vehicle:
    10 MGM TRD OR 4wd Auto DCSB
    Banks Monster Exhaust, Pop n Lock tailgate lock, Hook-Ups tie down brackets, USA Spec Ipod adaptor, WO seat covers, color matched grill with Grillcraft insert, Tuffy locking bed box
    Since he did say 2.4 I'm guessing he wants a 1st gen so the old 2.7 power numbers would matter here. You never know though.
     
  12. May 15, 2012 at 2:01 PM
    #12
    knucklehead

    knucklehead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Member:
    #77990
    Messages:
    273
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Ottawa
    Vehicle:
    SR5 4x4
    Hitch, nav header
    Let me repeat: There are THREE engines falling into your request. 2.4, old 2.7, and new 2.7.
    No experience with the two older engines, but the new 2.7 should satisfy you, just as long as its matched with an MT.
     
  13. May 15, 2012 at 2:23 PM
    #13
    jbandt

    jbandt [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Member:
    #78822
    Messages:
    54
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks for all the data guys. Seems like there isn't much difference between the old 2.7 and 2.4 and that the more noticeable difference is on the newer 2.7. Since I'm looking for something older (probably 1st gen) I should stick with the two older motors. Now If I could just find one at a dealership to test drive. LOL!
     
  14. May 15, 2012 at 2:35 PM
    #14
    BuzzardsGottaEat

    BuzzardsGottaEat "Pick up some speed.. You'll make it."

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Member:
    #55669
    Messages:
    5,736
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chaz
    Nebraska/South Dakota
    Vehicle:
    93 Pickup 4x4 [22R-E] 5MT
    OME suspension, LCE Performance parts, Konigs, etc. [see build]
    Good luck, not many 4cyl for sale (around here anyway) especially not with 4WD and 5 speed mt.
     
  15. May 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM
    #15
    BrokenTusk

    BrokenTusk I support a velociraptor free workplace.

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Member:
    #36607
    Messages:
    31,974
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Marcelasaurus
    AB, Canada
    Vehicle:
    The Scarlett Whore
    Check Build Thread!!
    hahaha If you only knew
     
  16. May 15, 2012 at 5:19 PM
    #16
    tlh178

    tlh178 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Member:
    #48535
    Messages:
    330
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    terry
    mich
    Vehicle:
    2012 4WD reg cab/ 02 SR5 Prerunner/07 FJC 4WD
    i have a fjc too, great power, a 02 tacoma w/ v6 and has some decent power, and a 2012 r/c 4 banger w/ manual and really not a power source. however the 4 banger is fun to drive and glad i brought it.
     
  17. May 15, 2012 at 8:14 PM
    #17
    tubesock

    tubesock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Member:
    #33528
    Messages:
    294
    Gender:
    Male
    Don't forget to account for the weight of the vehicles if you're worried about accelleration. The new 2.7L in the 2nd gen is definitely more powerful than the 4cyl engines in the 1st gen, but the 2nd gen is also quite a bit larger. The 1st gen regular cab weighed in at 2560lbs while the 2nd gen regular cab is 3140lbs (according to some shit i found on google). So with those numbers in mind, a 1st gen would probably have better acceleration.
     
  18. May 16, 2012 at 1:22 AM
    #18
    Tepidy

    Tepidy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Member:
    #46352
    Messages:
    1,075
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ted
    upstate NY
    Vehicle:
    11 tacoma 4x4
    Toytec Coil Overs 3.00" DSM UCA's (Desert Products) TSB 4 Leaf w/AAL by Pro Comp Bilstein 5100 rear 1"ToyTec SwayBar Drops 1" diff drop Detroit Trutrac Rear Diff Nitro 4.56 Gears Doug Thornley Header MagnaFlow Cat Back Exhaust Custom Built Rear Plate Bumper Custom Built Front Plate Bumper 4X Innovations Rock Sliders ATO Front Skid BAMF Rear Diff Skid Uniden 510XL Pro CB Raceline Renegades BF Goodrich Mud Terrains KM2's 265x75x16 WeatherTechs Rear Diff breather Relocate Intake Resonator Removed Yellow Wire Mod
    The newer 2.7 will give you the most power out of the three engines. (2nd gen Tacoma)
     
  19. May 16, 2012 at 2:27 AM
    #19
    eh2win

    eh2win HIM

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2011
    Member:
    #68657
    Messages:
    101
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    09 prerunner
    afe s-dry filter
    i got the 2.7 and i think if you get it auto it will lag a bit but mines stick and i never needed more power honestly i wouldent go with the tacoma for power in a truck i rather get a 5.7 tundra but that would be another thing im happy with the 2.7
     
  20. May 16, 2012 at 6:12 AM
    #20
    Kelson

    Kelson My Truck is Cuter than Yours

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Member:
    #6597
    Messages:
    4,592
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kelson
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Vehicle:
    08 5-Lug Reg. Cab SR5
    SR5 Exterior/Interior (Color matched Front Bumper, Chrome Grille Surround and Chrome Rear Bumper/Silver Scoshe Dash Kit, A/C Bezel, A/C Vent Surround) LED license plate and white interior lights, Wet Okole Seat Covers, iPad in-Dash, JL CL-RLC, JL 13TW5 sub, JL 500/1 Slash V1 amp, JL XR 6.5 Components, Rockford Fosgate 6X9s in Boxes Front XRunner Coils, DJM Control Arms and Rear 4X4 Leafs, Custom 2" Angled Streetacos.com Blocks Front XR Bilstien Struts and Rear XR Bilstien Shocks, CravenSpeen Antennae, RX-8 Rims w/ Fronts:235/40-R18 Sumitomo HTR Rears:245/40-R18 Goodyear Eagle GT, 35% Tint front windows, OEM Sliding Privacy Glass w/ 5% Ceramic Tint, Flowmaster Super 44 dumped before the axle, URD Short Throw Shifter, Door Sill Protectors, Door Edge Guards, OEM Sport Pedals,The Retrofit Source Morimoto Mini D2S Stage III 35W 5K HID Headlights, OEM Fog Lights w/ piss yellow bulbs, OEM Cruise Control, Porsche 944 Bucket Seats, BeefedTaco Skid Plate, Whale
    honestly, the differences in horsepower offered by the current generation 2.7L 2TR-FE is somewhat negated by the difference in vehicle weight. 2nd Gen trucks are heavier than their 1st Gen counterparts across the board.

    that being said, the 2TR is a great motor and that VVT-i really helps things to get a move on past 3k, and the 2nd Gen trucks are subsequently much faster than their 1st gen counterparts.

    You'll be happy with either one; the RZ engines are much easier to boost and many people have done so already with great success; whereas the 2TR has less aftermarket community support.

    also, keep in mind that this is still a four cylinder mid sized pickup truck. 0-60 times will range closer to the two digit mark and beyond, depending on cab configuration and transmission choice.

    if kept it it's sweet spot the truck can be pretty responsive despite it's seemingly lethargic performance characteristics; there is ample low end torque for a four banger.
     
To Top