Firearm BS thread

I have two Galco tuck-able holsters, one for my G27, one for my CZ999 compact, and they work pretty well:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004YTX5XM/ref=pe_385040_30332200_TE_item

 

Can't blame them, I wouldn't go out in public with a fanny pack without a pistol either.

 

I've been running my LCP in an Uncle Mike's Size 1 pocket hoslter for years now. Love it.

 

as phones keep getting bigger and bigger, we'll be able to pocket carry a fullsize 1911 soon without arousing any suspicion

 

The picture I posted above prints just like a wallet and if you actually need to draw the thing you'll be thankful for the shape. Others similar to what you describe are much more difficult to draw from in a timely and clean manner which is what you want from a holster for this use.

 

https://www.full30.com/video/825428454ac8746b30b6878fe18585a9

 

Here is a heads up for you guys, 9mm ammo for 10.48 per box

http://www.midwayusa.com/product/18...earance-_-clearance_20141212_1-_-producttitle

 

Might get a ruger 10/22 tomorrow. After shooting my dad ruger, I want one. Fun for plinking. Couple 25rd magazines make for lots of fun! Probably an all black synthetic

 

You got to have a 10/22 anyways, they're an awesome little gun

 

Exactly why I still carry the Elsie-Pea as my B.U.G.

 

That's a heck of a deal.
Too bad I've already got several thousand rounds of 9mm in the safe and just bought a 1911
Right now any free $$ for projectiles is going towards building up a stock of 45 ACP.


Edit:
God damn it. I caved. 1000 rounds of 124gr on its way.
If it gets here in time, maybe I'll give out some boxes as Christmas gifts, haha!

 

Optics question guys, more specificly spotting scopes. What are the advantages at long range say 500 yards + to a high dollar optic. I use a celestron 100mm at 60x but have trouble making out .308 holes in the target. Would a Vortex, US Optics or a Schmidt & Bender be that much better? I don't see them removing any of the distortion from the boil, but maybe the extra sharpness and contrast woild be that much better. Just have a hard time justifying $2000 when my little $450 can almost do it. I also noticed all the premium spotters mayb have 80-90mm lenses = smaller than mine, any thoughts on this? I am not scanning broad areas more used for zooming in on targets. No intrest in a Zeis or Leopold as I've looked through their scopes and don't like them, almost like they add too much contrast and makes the image look artificial. Thanks for opinions.

 

cheap solution: shoot n see targets

 

That is with shoot n see targets! It's almost better to make your own on white poster board and make a bulls eye with magic marker. I like shoot n see targets just no at 500+ yards.

 

http://bullseyecamera.com/ There you go. I saved you several thousand dollars. Well, as long as you don't shoot the camera.

 

Oh SNAP! I had to get up, my credit card was burning a hole in the chair! If I can't make one of these I will deffinatley get this.

 

Dealing with distorted images is a thing of the past. You could hillbilly something together for sure. Shoot, an Iphone and a gopro would work out quite a ways, and if you had some sort of bluetoooth booster, maybe further.