1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Fuel Mileage mismatch

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by Laurence243, Nov 30, 2015.

  1. Nov 30, 2015 at 5:54 PM
    #1
    Laurence243

    Laurence243 [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169712
    Messages:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2010 Tacoma 2.7, 5-speed, 4wd
    Yellow wire mod, LCE header, 2.5" cat-back exhaust
    I've been using Torque Pro with an OBDLink MX for a few things, including measuring my fuel mileage.

    According to Torque Pro, my average mileage lately has been ~22mpg.

    Just fueled up, dividing odometer by fuel input got me 17.3mpg.

    I have 32'' tires, stock was 31'' I think. My speedometer is dead-on accurate. 0.4Don't know if the odometer is accurate though. Even if my stock tires were 30'', the difference in circumference is only 6.6%, which would be 18.44mpg.

    So what is more accurate? Why is there a disparity in my mileage numbers?
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2015
  2. Nov 30, 2015 at 7:53 PM
    #2
    Shepdog08

    Shepdog08 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Member:
    #114652
    Messages:
    99
    Gender:
    Male
    265/70 R16 BF Goodrich A/T's Plasti-dipped factory wheels More to come...soon
    Torque has an MPG trim adjustment you may need to change under vehicle settings.
     
  3. Nov 30, 2015 at 7:56 PM
    #3
    Shepdog08

    Shepdog08 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Member:
    #114652
    Messages:
    99
    Gender:
    Male
    265/70 R16 BF Goodrich A/T's Plasti-dipped factory wheels More to come...soon
    I always bank on what the hand math figures out at unless I've done major tire and gearing changes. So I'd check your vehicle settings in torque and adjust accordingly.
     
  4. Nov 30, 2015 at 7:59 PM
    #4
    worthywads

    worthywads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Member:
    #58841
    Messages:
    5,345
    Gender:
    Male
    Peoples Republic of Boulder
    Vehicle:
    05 5-lug access I4 Stick, 70 Challenger Vert
    I'd have to guess the app is wrong, as said probably need to adjust a fuel factor.
     
  5. Dec 1, 2015 at 9:12 AM
    #5
    edm3rd

    edm3rd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Member:
    #89550
    Messages:
    896
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Duke
    Memphis TN
    Vehicle:
    09 PreRunner AC 6sp
    hard tonneau,scangauge
    Check your odometer with either GPS or by mile marker. Best to do at least 50 miles. If your speedometer is spot-on, your odometer is likely off. ScanGauge has both fuel and speed/distance correction factor. Set mine to correct the odometer as speedometer error doesn't bother me, would rather have accurate miles per gallon.

    MPG is not always easy to calculate accurately. In addition to the above mileage error, it's hard to really get an accurate number for fuel used - different pumps shut off at different fill levels, and most people do not want to overfill the tank. Best bet is probably use Fuelly or a phone app, and get an average of several tanks. This will also vary with stop & go city driving vs high speed interstate vs lower speed highway. If my ScanGauge gallons used is within 5% of what the pump says, I call it good. Closest I've come on accuracy is consistent driving, such as 2 days of interstate at about the same speed.

    BTW, most all of the OEM 6 lug Tacoma tires are about 30.5" diameter. BUT, mine lost a full inch when replaced at 37k miles, and they were not down to wear bars, which is another factor that affects the accuracy.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2015
  6. Dec 4, 2015 at 9:44 AM
    #6
    Laurence243

    Laurence243 [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169712
    Messages:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2010 Tacoma 2.7, 5-speed, 4wd
    Yellow wire mod, LCE header, 2.5" cat-back exhaust
    Ran some miles with my odometer trip zeroed with a distance traveled display on the GPS. Dead on accurate for 11 miles, the odo would have to have been off by 3.3 miles by then for the fuel mileage to be correct. Time to play with the trim factor.
     
  7. Dec 4, 2015 at 10:10 AM
    #7
    nd4spdbh

    nd4spdbh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Member:
    #114055
    Messages:
    14,601
    Gender:
    Male
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    13 DCSB TRD OR v6 Auto
    ONLY accurate way is to top off your tank the same way every fill up. reset odo, then divide gallons used by miles traveled. Any other computer calculation is simply an educated guess
     
  8. Dec 4, 2015 at 10:57 AM
    #8
    edm3rd

    edm3rd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Member:
    #89550
    Messages:
    896
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Duke
    Memphis TN
    Vehicle:
    09 PreRunner AC 6sp
    hard tonneau,scangauge
    Lots of folks don't recommend filling tank past first click-off (fuel vapor charcoal filter), but every pump is different and even affected by how many people are using pumps at the same time. I do it on long road trips, ONLY if I'm immediately going to burn at least 2-3 gallons (truck will take 2.5 gallons from first click-off). No problems in 59K miles. Once you get trim adjusted, the only variation I see is from change in driving habits - more (or less) city driving, all highway, how much time idling in a fast food line, etc. My ScanGauge gallons used is usually within .5 gallon of what the pump says.
     
  9. Dec 4, 2015 at 4:19 PM
    #9
    Laurence243

    Laurence243 [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169712
    Messages:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2010 Tacoma 2.7, 5-speed, 4wd
    Yellow wire mod, LCE header, 2.5" cat-back exhaust
    Also I found an option for a more accurate calculation using more sensors in torque, seems to be dead on now. Also it can calculate your actual volumetric efficiency, will post mine up tonight
     
  10. Dec 4, 2015 at 9:30 PM
    #10
    Laurence243

    Laurence243 [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169712
    Messages:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2010 Tacoma 2.7, 5-speed, 4wd
    Yellow wire mod, LCE header, 2.5" cat-back exhaust
    Highest value so far is 83%. For the sake of searches, this is the volumetric efficiency for a 2010 Tacoma with the 2TR-FE, 4WD, manual transmission, stock intake. As measured by Torque Pro with an OBDLink MX.
     
  11. Dec 8, 2015 at 9:56 PM
    #11
    Laurence243

    Laurence243 [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169712
    Messages:
    37
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2010 Tacoma 2.7, 5-speed, 4wd
    Yellow wire mod, LCE header, 2.5" cat-back exhaust
    Got 85% maxing the throttle at about 5k rpms.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top