1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Gas Mileage Sucks

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by Rushbrook, Dec 29, 2011.

  1. Dec 29, 2011 at 10:10 AM
    #21
    iroh

    iroh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Member:
    #65439
    Messages:
    1,390
    Gender:
    Male
    michigander
    Vehicle:
    07 AC SR5 2.7 5MT 4x4
    tonneau
    You need a scangauge, ultragauge, or equivalent. You're doing something wrong with your new habits.

    Hypermiling is kinda like cooking - tips are nice, but unless you know how it affects the entire recipe, you could ruin your dinner.

    Keeping RPM down - this is good for mileage. However most people will push their throttle way too much to compensate, completely flushing away any efficiency gains. This engine likes 75-80% load, and not over, for the best mileage. That means shifting at 1800 rpm takes a third of a mile to get to speed. Need to accelerate faster? Increase the RPM, not the engine load.

    Coasting in neutral - this is a mixed bag. Properly used it does increase mileage a little bit, but nowhere near as much as a car. The truck weighs so much that the rule of thumb to guess how much fuel you're saving is how much you're minimizing your brake use. Coasting from 55 to a stop on the flat will easily take a third of a mile, which may tick off those behind you. If it's an empty road, then great. Otherwise, coast down in gear. Injectors only shut off if the RPM when you let off the gas is over 1600, and will stay off down to 1200, so keep that in mind. Also, the engine will idle at 1300 rpm instead of 700 rpm when coasting at speed, using 0.6 gph instead of the normal 0.35 gph you'd expect at idle.

    It can get complicated... once you're into it you may feel like a warp core engineer
     
  2. Dec 29, 2011 at 10:13 AM
    #22
    iroh

    iroh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Member:
    #65439
    Messages:
    1,390
    Gender:
    Male
    michigander
    Vehicle:
    07 AC SR5 2.7 5MT 4x4
    tonneau
    This graph is no longer correct for the modern automobile. I'd wager the study it refers to goes back to the days of unlocked torque converters.

    This truck gets the best mileage at the lowest speed you can do in top gear while keeping engine load low. On the 6 speed, that's about 35 mph, and it's good for anywhere from 30 to 40 mpg on the flat. On the automatic it would be the lowest speed the torque converter locks in 5th. Every speed above that reduces the mileage, and of course the faster you go the less efficient you get.
     
  3. Dec 29, 2011 at 12:07 PM
    #23
    Rushbrook

    Rushbrook [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Member:
    #48268
    Messages:
    239
    Gender:
    Male
    To those complaining about another as mileage thread..Don't read it. I am and have been fully aware that this truck gets crappy gas mileage. I'm looking for helpful advice from people who drive the same vehicle I do. Seems like a semi-valuable effort. I could have used the search but there's more value in getting up-to-date advice.

    I did, and a car at 30mpg will save me $200/mo right off the bat (and this is including keeping my truck). That's based on a pretty accurate estimate of the miles I drive in a month (ends up being about 2300) and including oil changes and insurance. Calculating incidental maintenance really shouldn't be factored in. My truck could blow up at any moment too. I don't know what $200/mo means to you, but to me it's significant. I make a nice living, but that $200 can be used in better ways than putting more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

    I addition to this, I got my 2007 last year with 28k miles on it. I've managed to double that already. These trucks have a killer resale and at the moment I owe 5k less than the average trade value. That's great and all, but I'd rather not pile another 25k miles a year on this thing.
     
  4. Dec 29, 2011 at 12:08 PM
    #24
    Rushbrook

    Rushbrook [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Member:
    #48268
    Messages:
    239
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks to everyone thus far. You've been helpful and it's appreciated.
     
  5. Dec 29, 2011 at 12:19 PM
    #25
    rollin904

    rollin904 Feather Slinger

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Member:
    #54724
    Messages:
    2,322
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    TJ
    Greenville, SC
    Vehicle:
    '14 DCSB 4x4
    It will save you $200 a month after calculating what insurance, maintenance (I assume it will be an older car after all), and the price of the car? I had a paid off newer scion and it still didn't make sense to have two vehicles to "save on gas." I wouldn't have bought the truck if I cared that much about a few hundred a month.
     
  6. Dec 29, 2011 at 12:24 PM
    #26
    fadippides

    fadippides Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2011
    Member:
    #68112
    Messages:
    161
    Gender:
    Male
    NEPA
    Vehicle:
    12 TRD Off Road
    I wonder if a full belly plate would help much
     
  7. Dec 29, 2011 at 12:25 PM
    #27
    Simon's Mom

    Simon's Mom Wag More Bark Less

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Member:
    #1297
    Messages:
    10,197
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Judy or Jude :)
    NEK Island Pond VT
    Vehicle:
    24 Tundra Trd Sport former 13 TRD OR
    Stock for now
    I found the truck gets the best mpg keeping rpms down, no quick starts...ie the right foot mod.
    Had a scangauge for about 2 yrs then sold it. It definitely came down to monitoring my use of the gas pedal.
     
  8. Dec 29, 2011 at 12:27 PM
    #28
    Burns

    Burns Excellent Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Member:
    #1871
    Messages:
    3,945
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    17 DCSB Off-Road
    Bilstein 5100's @ 2.0", Wheelers 1.5" AAL, 265/75/16 Firestone Destination AT2's
    I feel your pain man (I drive 70 miles a day) when my truck is paid off in a few months I am going to get a car that gets at least 30mpg for a DD. I will keep the truck for use on the weekends.
     
  9. Dec 29, 2011 at 12:40 PM
    #29
    MountainEarth

    MountainEarth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Member:
    #30519
    Messages:
    2,481
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bryan
    CO
    Vehicle:
    2010 TRD OR Access
    Leer 100XR Shell, BedRug mat - comfy sleeping, GT Covers microfiber seat covers, BFG All Terrains 265/70r16, Dashmat, Antennax 13" shorty antenna, Weathertech liners, Ultra Gauge, Avid Light Bar, PIAA 520 ATPs, one old dog
    OP - Is this a manual? I'm assuming if you're coasting in neutral. Also burn through a whole tank before calculating mileage. I have found I get much worse mileage on the 1st half the tank than I do on the last half. For one, ever gallon you burn is 6 fewer pounds of load you're carrying around with you.

    To those complaining about mileage threads ... I get your point if someone just bought their truck and then is complaining 1st tank out. But the OP has a legitimate concern if his rock steady MPG has now suddenly dropped.
     
  10. Dec 29, 2011 at 2:01 PM
    #30
    BlueT

    BlueT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Member:
    #15341
    Messages:
    5,615
    Gender:
    Male
    NorthEast
    Vehicle:
    07 Dbl Cab LB with LSD
    I moded 1999 Taco so much it had turned to Land Cruiser
    :notsure:
    I have 07 too and my truck does 23-25 MPG on my 50 miles commute to work. I dont see how 30 MPG car saves money over the truck. Those trucks are capable of some crazy mileage which makes owning a small car not worth it. If I was in the same boat as you I would solve the mystery of why your truck is using so much fuel.
     
  11. Dec 29, 2011 at 3:25 PM
    #31
    scocar

    scocar hypotenoper

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Member:
    #25814
    Messages:
    39,434
    It is from the DOE site

    http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml

    Estimates for the effect of speed on MPG are based on a study by West, B.H., R.N. McGill, J.W. Hodgson, S.S. Sluder, and D.E. Smith, Development and Verification of Light-Duty Modal Emissions and Fuel Consumption Values for Traffic Models, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, March 1999.

    All the 90s models automatics in the study had lockups.
     
  12. Dec 29, 2011 at 4:40 PM
    #32
    iroh

    iroh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Member:
    #65439
    Messages:
    1,390
    Gender:
    Male
    michigander
    Vehicle:
    07 AC SR5 2.7 5MT 4x4
    tonneau
    Thanks. Much more recent that I anticipated. I'd seen it floating around for so many years I had assumed it was much more antiquated.

    I still maintain that it isn't correct for the majority of modern automobiles and even less so for vehicles equipped with manual transmissions (ask any dedicated hypermiler if they get their best mileage at 65 mph). It's not impossible to get good mileage at 65mph, my old Honda would turn numbers around 45mpg at that speed, but it would do better going slower. Either way that graph's indications are nowhere near the actual mileage behavior of this truck.

    I do know that in the 90s the lockup behavior was often programmed to be far less aggressive, sometimes not engaging until 45 mph or higher on some transmissions, and unlocking even with relatively low increases in throttle to provide a smoother driving experience. Today they'll lock much earlier to improve those EPA ratings. It may have something to do with it.
     
  13. Jan 1, 2012 at 7:56 AM
    #33
    Rushbrook

    Rushbrook [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Member:
    #48268
    Messages:
    239
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm using the tips on my current tank. I'll report in a day or two. Someone asked if it's a manual--it's an auto. I save about 300rpm when coasting in neutral though. I think someone said it burns more gas though. How is that possible?
     
  14. Jan 1, 2012 at 9:17 AM
    #34
    OZ-T

    OZ-T You are going backwards

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Member:
    #27584
    Messages:
    50,460
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Peter North
    British Columbia
    Vehicle:
    Mag Grey 09 Trd Sport DCLB 4x4
    OME 885x , OME shocks and Dakars , Wheelers SuperBumps front and rear , 275/70/17 Hankook ATm , OEM bed mat , Weathertech digifit floor liners , Weathertech in-channel vents , headache rack , Leer 100RCC commercial canopy , TRD bedside decals removed , Devil Horns by Andres , HomerTaco Satoshi
    IIRC , the injectors shut down when you are coasting in gear
     
  15. Jan 1, 2012 at 9:36 AM
    #35
    worthywads

    worthywads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Member:
    #58841
    Messages:
    5,345
    Gender:
    Male
    Peoples Republic of Boulder
    Vehicle:
    05 5-lug access I4 Stick, 70 Challenger Vert
    Actually a lot less often than is assumed.

    Engine needs to be engine braking above 1500 rpm, and if you see when that is actually the case, it just isn't easy to spend much time there.

    Certainly useful on grades but not typical commuting.
     
  16. Jan 1, 2012 at 9:44 AM
    #36
    OZ-T

    OZ-T You are going backwards

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Member:
    #27584
    Messages:
    50,460
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Peter North
    British Columbia
    Vehicle:
    Mag Grey 09 Trd Sport DCLB 4x4
    OME 885x , OME shocks and Dakars , Wheelers SuperBumps front and rear , 275/70/17 Hankook ATm , OEM bed mat , Weathertech digifit floor liners , Weathertech in-channel vents , headache rack , Leer 100RCC commercial canopy , TRD bedside decals removed , Devil Horns by Andres , HomerTaco Satoshi
    I don't disagree , I was answering the other poster's question .

    FWIW , I live in a quite hilly area and the engine braking is great .
     
  17. Jan 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM
    #37
    worthywads

    worthywads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Member:
    #58841
    Messages:
    5,345
    Gender:
    Male
    Peoples Republic of Boulder
    Vehicle:
    05 5-lug access I4 Stick, 70 Challenger Vert
    Just pointing out that it doesn't happen every time while coast in gear, in fact not very often.
     
  18. Jan 1, 2012 at 4:01 PM
    #38
    ToyComa92

    ToyComa92 Write your love, Then your anger.

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2011
    Member:
    #63168
    Messages:
    6,239
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jon
    Conifer, Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2006 Tacoma TRD sport Debadged
    Heated katzskin leather, Black TRD sport wheels, Bilstein 5100s, Toytec 2" Springs, Deaver 2" AAL, Pioneer AVH4400BH, Ultragauge, Weathertechs front/rear,
    i would smile to high heaven seeing anything over 20MPG on my truck. I usually get around 15-17.9. 15 when ive used half the tank romping through mud or snow or just messing around.
     
  19. Jan 2, 2012 at 11:02 AM
    #39
    Rushbrook

    Rushbrook [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Member:
    #48268
    Messages:
    239
    Gender:
    Male
    Ok..so if I understand you correctly, you're saying that the injectors *sometimes* shut off when coasting, which obviously uses less fuel. But, my RPM's are decreasing (lower than when in gear) when coasting in neutral and the truck is more free to increase speed, which gives me more distance during my coasting period, correct?
     
  20. Jan 9, 2012 at 12:10 PM
    #40
    Rushbrook

    Rushbrook [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Member:
    #48268
    Messages:
    239
    Gender:
    Male
    OK...I checked my tires. I thought they were fine, but I guess the cold weather snuck up on me. they were about 5lb low. I corrected that up to 31 (just to be sure), filled the tank, and even changed the oil and air filter. Air filter was a year old at least and was really dirty. Regardless, what I've read says that the air filter cleanliness has no real affect on mileage until it's at the point that it's passing almost no air at all.

    Anyway...I felt the tires would make a big difference. I spent another tank driving like grandpa, coasting, anticipating stoplights, running stop signs, etc. I drove it down to the last 0.5 gallon. The only detriment to my mileage that I participate in is remote start. I had about 25 total minutes of idle time with that. According to what I've read, you only burn an average of 0.3 gallon per HOUR. It's also been between 45 and 60 degrees all week. And I don't know if I mentioned it, but this is an 07 TRD automatic.

    Anyway..I got my best mileage yet..

    A whopping 18.1. That's exactly 2 tenths of a gallon better than when I've done my usual 78mph on the interstate.

    The only thing I can say here is that I just live in too hilly of an area. I'm in Eastern KY/SouthWest WV, and it's smack in the middle of the Appalachains. If you watch "Justified", I'm only about an hour from some of those spots and it looks exactly the same. Sad thing is, I'm right by I-64 and doing most of my driving there, but I guess it's just too many long, gradual inclines. They really are just barely hills, but I guess they're taking their toll on my truck when they're 5-10 miles long at a stretch. To go 65mph, I'm running right about 1500rpm one way, but 1900 on the way back. I could get a scangauge I suppose, but potentially gaining 1-2mpg really isn't worth the effort.

    So...I give up I guess. :)

    It's gonna be horrendous when the snow kicks in and I've got 300lb of gravel in the bed..lol. It seems ridiculous to spend $1,000 a month for my transportation but I would regret getting rid of this truck, so I shant do it. I'm glad I have a good job though.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top