1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

How much did e loads actually affect your milage

Discussion in 'Wheels & Tires' started by Evostaco, Jun 15, 2024.

  1. Jun 15, 2024 at 5:51 PM
    #1
    Evostaco

    Evostaco [OP] Jack of some of the trades, master of maybe 2

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2021
    Member:
    #356677
    Messages:
    2,068
    Gender:
    Male
    Nebraska
    Vehicle:
    2021 tacoma offroad, mt, superwhite
    Interested to hear how much e load tires changed your mileage and power. Getting a lot of varying info
     
  2. Jun 16, 2024 at 8:33 AM
    #2
    TSAVO

    TSAVO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2018
    Member:
    #247434
    Messages:
    963
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Tempe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2018 TRD OR
    Here is my experience with E-Loads over the last 6 years. 2018 TRD Offroad, 2WD, 3" lift KD MAX tune from 3-4 years ago. Currently on 285/65-18 Wildpeak RT 01's. The mpg varies a lot depending on how you dive it. I live in the Phoenix area so things are pretty flat around here. On my commute which is 60 miles round trip 98% freeway I can still get a hand calculated 18-20 mpg if I drive mellow and keep it around 70mph or less. 75-80 will drop it down to about 16 mpg. On a road trip with a passenger and say 300-500 extra pounds of stuff from Phx to San Diego going between 75-85 it drops all the way down to 13-14 mpg. The power is just fine. The 1st set I had were Nitto Terra Grapplers and I managed to get about 76K miles out of them.
    IMG_3028.jpg
     
    Evostaco[OP] likes this.
  3. Jun 17, 2024 at 10:33 AM
    #3
    clenkeit

    clenkeit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2019
    Member:
    #291841
    Messages:
    2,431
    First Name:
    Colin
    Lakewood, CA
    Vehicle:
    2010 White DCLB TRD Sport
    You're going to get a million answers because "e load" is kinda meaningless in regard to your question. Weight and size are going to be bigger factors than load rating. And even then, it's super hard to get any kind of a consensus regarding mpg and either weight or size. Seems everyone's situation is different.

    As an example... My mpg stayed the same or possibly got slightly worse when I switched from an E load tire to a C load tire.
     
    OldSchlPunk and Primo 95 like this.
  4. Jun 17, 2024 at 12:29 PM
    #4
    Primo 95

    Primo 95 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Member:
    #81207
    Messages:
    962
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Primo!
    San Antonio, TX
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB 4X4
    265/75/16 S/T Maxx 16X8.5 Level 8 Trackers 5100 1.75 HID, LED interior, 3" N-Fab step bars
    I agree with the above, it is going to be all over the place due to so many variables. I have always had 265/75/16, I originally had Duratracs in C. when I switched to S/T Max in E, I got almost 2 miles more per gallon. I recently switched to SL rated Wildpeaks (which is considered "B") and mileage stayed exactly the same as when I had E, which were significantly heavier. My tires do stick out past the fenders and I have always wondered how much aggressive side tread impact wind resistance? Duratracs probably had the most agressive sidewall, and the S/T Maxx the least, and the Wildpeaks probably in the middle.
     
  5. Jun 17, 2024 at 1:04 PM
    #5
    Evostaco

    Evostaco [OP] Jack of some of the trades, master of maybe 2

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2021
    Member:
    #356677
    Messages:
    2,068
    Gender:
    Male
    Nebraska
    Vehicle:
    2021 tacoma offroad, mt, superwhite
    The size I'm looking at would be 265/75/16. I know more aggressive tread can impact milage. I guess I'm mostly curious about the impact weight has
     
  6. Jun 17, 2024 at 1:31 PM
    #6
    OldSchlPunk

    OldSchlPunk A legend in my own mind!

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2022
    Member:
    #390091
    Messages:
    5,039
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rich
    East Central Wisco
    Vehicle:
    '17 OffRoad Silver Sky Metallic
    Small lift, slightly oversized tires, well...
    Tire weight and height will affect your mileage in stop and go situations. Tire width will affect you while going down the road (rolling resistance).

    I recently switched from 265/75/16 General Grabber ATx tires to Falken Wildpeak AT4w in 255/85/16. The Generals were E load, the Falkens are C, Falkens are about 4 lbs per tire heavier (IIRC). The combination of taller, narrower, softer, heavier tires have me at nearly the same fuel mileage. Go figure. I do get better gas mileage on the highway at a steady speed but considerably worse into a headwind.

    Long story short, I'm anywhere from 15 to 19+ MPG, depending on the variables on any given day.
     
    Evostaco[OP] likes this.
  7. Jun 17, 2024 at 1:36 PM
    #7
    OldSchlPunk

    OldSchlPunk A legend in my own mind!

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2022
    Member:
    #390091
    Messages:
    5,039
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rich
    East Central Wisco
    Vehicle:
    '17 OffRoad Silver Sky Metallic
    Small lift, slightly oversized tires, well...
    Oh, I'll have to wait a minute, but I think the C load sidewalls will be more compliant in winter weather...just a guess.
     
    Evostaco[OP] likes this.
  8. Jun 18, 2024 at 7:49 PM
    #8
    DavesTaco68

    DavesTaco68 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2016
    Member:
    #200391
    Messages:
    3,345
    North Thompson, BC
    Vehicle:
    2013 Tacoma TRD
    - ICON UCAs, BP51/Kings, SCS wheels, 285s, Leer 100XR canopy. Greenlane aluminum winch bumper, Smittybilt X20 winch. Trying Falken AT3w now, Really like BF KO2s.
    I have 60mph speed limits where I live, I found very little difference between a 45lb , a 51lb tire and a 61lb tire AT (KO2s and Falken AT3W) for mpg. Driving conservative I get between 18 and 20mpg on road trips.
    I thought there would be a bigger difference. If your commute is 70mph or more then things are going to go in the shitter!
     
    Evostaco[QUOTED][OP] likes this.
  9. Jun 20, 2024 at 5:10 AM
    #9
    nzbrock

    nzbrock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2013
    Member:
    #94572
    Messages:
    3,231
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Noah
    San Marcos, TX
    Vehicle:
    99 TRD Prerunner 3RZ
    SAW 2.0 Coilovers Wheeler's 5 Leaf + 3 AAL Bilstein 5100s LCE long tube header Flowmaster Delta 50 Muffler FJ Trail Team Wheels 4Runner overhead sunglass console 4Runner leather seats All LED lights Red/Clear Tail Light Tundra Brakes HID Projector Retrofits 4Runner Auto Up/Down Windows Bullet Liner Cargo tie down system E-locker axle swap w/4.56 Gears ARE MX Cap Prinsu Toprac Custom heated turn signal/puddle light mirrors Volant Intake Tube
    I recently went from cooper st maxx 255/85/16 to cooper road + trail 265/75/16. This was to help with mpg and power. The st maxx were 53lbs per tire while the road and trail are 40lbs per tire. I dropped 52lbs of unsprung weight! The ride is also significantly smoother with the thinner side walls on the road + trails. Load range E tires are not designed for lighter weight trucks like tacomas. If they’re for off-road, you probably don’t care, but if you’re primarily driving on road, you will feel it.
     
    banditcamp and Evostaco[OP] like this.
  10. Jun 20, 2024 at 6:50 AM
    #10
    thegame

    thegame Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Member:
    #52855
    Messages:
    1,655
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brian
    Folsom, CA
    Vehicle:
    Cement 2019 TRD OR
    E load or C load doesn't matter because some C loads weigh nearly what E loads weigh. Heavier tires will be tougher for the truck to get up to speed but once at cruising speed you'll see little to no difference between the 2. Ride comfort is a whole other story and I firmly believe E loads are way overkill for a little Tacoma unless you frequently kill tires offroad.
     
    Evostaco[OP] likes this.
  11. Jun 20, 2024 at 7:23 AM
    #11
    OffroadToy

    OffroadToy old, forgetful, and decomposing

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Member:
    #22680
    Messages:
    6,906
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2007 Offroad DCSB AT- VSC,TRAC,HAC, & DAC
    Icon Stage 8, ECGS Bushing, Timbren ubolt flip, Crown extended brake lines, Overland Custom Design sway bar links, rear differential breather extension, oil filter drain hose, a/c drain hose extension & reroute, front windows tint, Cat Security, XPEL headlight/fog & grill protection, OEM block heater, RCBS illuminated 4X4 switch, Weathertech mats, Wet Okole seat covers, Sherpa Grand Teton/Crows Nest, Baja Designs S8 light bar, Diode Dynamics SS3 Pro fog lights, Method 305 NV Double Black, 275/70/17 Toyo R/T Trail.
    Been running e loads for the last 25 years. Never felt much of a noticable power loss and as far as gas milage i wouldn't know... never checked it and don't plan on starting. Another thing... never had a flat with e loads. Most of those years has been with bfg a/t 265/70/16- 265/75/16 & now toyo r/t 275/70/17. Truck has 2" Icon stage 8 and tracks like a tank... no body roll and feels/drives way better than stock. E loads are a rougher ride but that's how a truck should feel imho.

    DSCN0820.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2024
    Evostaco[OP] likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top