1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Injen or URD CAI???????

Discussion in 'Performance and Tuning' started by hitaco, Aug 26, 2009.

?

URD v.s. Injen

Poll closed Dec 4, 2009.
  1. urd

    46.2%
  2. injen

    53.8%
  1. Aug 26, 2009 at 3:34 AM
    #1
    hitaco

    hitaco [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Member:
    #10099
    Messages:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    wahiawa
    Vehicle:
    07 tacoma
    Dual exhaust flowmasters 40 series, H.I.D. projection kit 6000 black out tint, black wheel mod, dome and map light L.E.D. cool white ^_^
    so im searching the market for a cai n idk if i want to get the Injen cai with power flow or the urd TCAI, the kit for the Injen cost around 386.76 dollars where as the TCAI cost 289.00 or 489.00 with the MAF Calbrator. so my question is is the extra 101 worth it??? n will i need a MAF cal if i get the Injen??? also it say's on the website that the injen is tuned ready so idk if i need to tune it??? but probably will if i do get it XD to me im mostly leaning towards Injen because my 2000 honda civic ek is using it n its awesome ^__^ thanks for all ur replys XD
     
  2. Aug 26, 2009 at 10:48 AM
    #2
    XrunnIT

    XrunnIT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Member:
    #7770
    Messages:
    849
    Gender:
    Male
    Austin, TX
    Vehicle:
    1GR-GZE X-Runner
    Built Motor by LC Engineering Boosted by TRD
    If you have to choose between those two, I would choose the Injen.

    But you are better off getting the TRD, AFE, or K&N. The URD cai has a poor design.
     
  3. Aug 26, 2009 at 10:51 AM
    #3
    JAK3

    JAK3 O.G.

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Member:
    #20328
    Messages:
    129
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    JAKE
    O.C.
    Vehicle:
    09 double cab
    tint
    URD all the way man gadget knows is stuff!
     
  4. Aug 27, 2009 at 4:16 PM
    #4
    roxspin72

    roxspin72 Enjoying my addiction

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Member:
    #4659
    Messages:
    1,830
    Gender:
    Male
    NC
    Vehicle:
    Speedway Blue, TRD, 4X4,
    Oh Yeah!!!
    MAF Cali will benefit all Intakes. It is the best most economic way to tune, Unless you can afford the X-1.

    I like URD. Just chickened out on the install, and did not want to relocate the MAF sensor.

    I agree with TRD and AFE. I now have Volant, and no issues accept it will need a tune:cool:
     
  5. Aug 31, 2009 at 2:34 PM
    #5
    nad

    nad mmmm tacos!

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Member:
    #17388
    Messages:
    3,075
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jordan
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    2014 Sierra All Terrain
    k&n is a poor design makes you lose power, go with afe or trd
     
  6. Sep 1, 2009 at 7:36 AM
    #6
    XrunnIT

    XrunnIT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Member:
    #7770
    Messages:
    849
    Gender:
    Male
    Austin, TX
    Vehicle:
    1GR-GZE X-Runner
    Built Motor by LC Engineering Boosted by TRD
    I disagree, my MAF accuracy is almost perfect (in many cases more accurate then AFE or TRD because of some slight modding - smoothing of the transitions at the end of the tube).

    While it is prone to heat soak, that's the down side to an open filter. Cruising IAT are within 3°F of ambient.

    As of this posting, I have the fastest MPH in the 1/4 for any supercharged XR (second fastest for 1GR to the best of my knowledge behind a twin turbo'd XR), and that is done with the K&N intake.
     
To Top