1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Is the 2.7 4X4 auto a "dog"?

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by Cabin Fever, Jul 1, 2013.

  1. Aug 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM
    #21
    DNovak

    DNovak Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Member:
    #111122
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dawson
    Nebraska
    Vehicle:
    2012 Tacoma reg.cam 4x4 I4 automatic
    I have a 2012 reg. cab 4x4 automatic and I think the power band is perfect,it actually gets a few more mpg then my 2010 manual shift,however if you get this same configuration in a access cab or crew I feel it would be underpowered the weight would make all the difference just my 2 cents good luck!
     
  2. Aug 25, 2013 at 4:38 PM
    #22
    95 taco

    95 taco Redneck rich

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    Member:
    #78175
    Messages:
    10,684
    Gender:
    Male
    South Miss.
    Vehicle:
    2003 4x4 TRD SR5
    OME 883 front, OMD 3.5" rear Relentless front bumper
    no sir, it's a truck, big difference :p

    I've driven my cousins 04 2.7 auto pre runner Xtra cab truck and it's got OK power, it's not a 4x4, but that shouldn't make to big a difference.

    I have a 04 DC 4x4, 3.4 auto trans, with the extra weight of the DC i sorta want a SC, but that's just me, i used to own a 95.5 tacoma 5 lug with the 2.4 (the same as the 2.7 except the 2.7 is bored and stroked to make 15-20(?) more HP and torque) and i really liked the way it drove, i'd have to downshift to keep 55 on some hills, but once i got up in the power band (2700-3500 RPM) it'd hold the speed like a champ.
     
  3. Sep 10, 2013 at 2:56 PM
    #23
    Gage05

    Gage05 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2013
    Member:
    #111962
    Messages:
    12
    Gender:
    Male
    Knoxville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2013 Toyota Tacoma Regular Cab 4x4
    I have a 2013 Regular Cab 4x4 automatic, that I bought less than a month ago, and I agree with the others who have said the power is adequate. I was worried about the automatic at first because I had read that it was slow, but I think it's just fine, and it's a lot of fun to drive.

    I have not had much trouble passing either on the street or on the interstate when I needed to.

    I came from a 2005 Honda Accord V6 coupe that would throw you back in your seat when you stomped the gas petal, but I was not disapointed when I got the truck. It's not nearly as fast as the Accord, but it runs along really well.

    Plus, I get to tow up to 3500 pounds with my new Tacoma. I would never be able to do that with the Accord. :).

    I'm happy with my purchase. :).
     
  4. Sep 13, 2013 at 9:15 AM
    #24
    Tacoma4x4banger

    Tacoma4x4banger Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Member:
    #112397
    Messages:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Danny
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2013 Tacoma Reg Cab 4x4
    265/75-16 BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A's. Rancho 2.5 inch lift kit w/ Front UCA's and Coilovers, Rear blocks and RS9000XL's.
    I had a 2001 Mazda B3000 3.0 V6 with a 5-speed manual and my new 2013 Tacoma 2.7 4cyl auto has more power and torque. Both are regular cabs and the Tacoma outperforms the Mazda any day. Its definitely not the power of the 4.0 but it's not a dog in anyway.
     
  5. Sep 14, 2013 at 12:22 PM
    #25
    Greenbean

    Greenbean B.S. Goodwrench

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Member:
    #84332
    Messages:
    1,545
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Zack
    Western NC
    Vehicle:
    2015 AC 4cyl MT 4x4 Utility Package
    I had the 2012 RC MT 4x4 last year, drove it a year then through some circumstances was offered an amazing deal and lower payment for a 2013 RC AT 4x4, same color and all, I took it.

    I miss the 5-spd about once a week for maybe 5 seconds, I absolutely LOVE, LOVE the auto. Probably because it's paired with the buckets now but it's a 4cyl truck. it's very comfortable and I just click it into gear and away I go.

    I wish It has a 5-spd auto so 1st and second weren't so dang tall, but i understand why it's just a 4-spd. No need to change something that has worked so well over the years.

    I'll be taking my first road trip in my auto RC in a month to PA to visit family, I'll have cruise on there by then also. I am really looking forward to it.
     
  6. Sep 14, 2013 at 12:30 PM
    #26
    PcBuilder14

    PcBuilder14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2011
    Member:
    #58522
    Messages:
    19,866
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brent
    Missouri
    Vehicle:
    2003 Tacoma TRD/SR5 4x4
    Suspension: Front - Bilstein 5100's/Eibach coils Rear - All Pro Expo Leafs/Rear Icon Remote Reservoir Shocks Wheels & Tires: 33x12.50x15 KM2's/Summit Racing 85 Black 8 Series Wheels/15x8/3.75" Backspacing [U]Armor:[/U] - [URL="http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/relentless-fabrication/152694-just-released-re
    I ran 33x12.50x15's on steel wheels on my extended cab 2.7 auto 4x4. It was obviously slower, but I could still drive it on the highway no problems.
     
  7. Sep 14, 2013 at 3:47 PM
    #27
    Tacoma4x4banger

    Tacoma4x4banger Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Member:
    #112397
    Messages:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Danny
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2013 Tacoma Reg Cab 4x4
    265/75-16 BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A's. Rancho 2.5 inch lift kit w/ Front UCA's and Coilovers, Rear blocks and RS9000XL's.
    I had a 94 Ford Escort wagon, it had 88 HP and did 0-60 in 29 seconds. My Tacoma 2.7L 4cyl feels like a dragster compared to that POS.
     
  8. Sep 14, 2013 at 4:13 PM
    #28
    Rich91710

    Rich91710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2012
    Member:
    #73470
    Messages:
    16,477
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rich
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    08 Base
    Satoshi with FJ badge, factory cruise, factory intermittent wipers, Redline Tuning hood-lift struts, Hellwig Swaybar, Rosen DVD-Nav
    Really? What did they do to them? I had a '91, same power, and it made 60 in about 18 seconds :D

    Trans went at 30k. Timing belt at 70k (it was a 90k maintenance item).
    Timing belt went again at 125k. Water pump was leaking (bad, puddles) when I got it back from the dealer that installed the timing belt.
    Oh, and the trans was shuddering on acceleration in 3rd.. smoothed out once it shifted to 4th.

    Got $1200 in trade for it on the '94 Toyota P/U in '96.
     
  9. Sep 15, 2013 at 10:31 AM
    #29
    Tacoma4x4banger

    Tacoma4x4banger Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Member:
    #112397
    Messages:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Danny
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2013 Tacoma Reg Cab 4x4
    265/75-16 BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A's. Rancho 2.5 inch lift kit w/ Front UCA's and Coilovers, Rear blocks and RS9000XL's.
    It had an exhaust leak, several oil leaks, fuel pump problems and finally threw a rod and never ran again. Also the seat belts didnt work and the brakes didnt work until they warmed up, which was kinda sketchy when first starting off. When it did run it would start shaking alot at around 70mph. I bought it for $400 and sold it for scrap for $400 but it did get me from A-B for a few years. It ran ok when I first got it but it already had 140,000 mi on it, and I got sick of spending money to fix it all the time.
     
To Top