1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Lower MPG

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas (1995-2004)' started by Notcris, Feb 27, 2020.

  1. Feb 27, 2020 at 7:02 AM
    #1
    Notcris

    Notcris [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2019
    Member:
    #300216
    Messages:
    837
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Cristian
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    2021 4runner Lunar Rock Trd Pro 2004 Xtra xab red
    None
    So recently I’ve been getting about 14 mpg and a while ago it was about 16-17. Any ideas? I don’t really step on it.

     
  2. Feb 27, 2020 at 7:08 AM
    #2
    BillsSR5

    BillsSR5 Looking out for #1

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2017
    Member:
    #216032
    Messages:
    8,654
    First Name:
    bill
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5
    me too, I have a 2nd gen 2.7l auto all stock, I cannot get over 19.5 mpg this Winter I was hoping to get over 20 mpg even with winterblend gas, new plugs, airfilter, proper tire PSI
     
  3. Feb 27, 2020 at 7:12 AM
    #3
    Black DOG Lila

    Black DOG Lila Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2019
    Member:
    #296344
    Messages:
    9,116
    Virginia
    Vehicle:
    2003 Tacoma SR5 2.7 5 speed 4WD
    Stock. EZ pass.Dump pass.Inspection sticker.Convict printed lic.plates.FG cap.
    Check your vacuum hoses
    Do the propane pass over test
     
  4. Feb 27, 2020 at 9:30 AM
    #4
    Notcris

    Notcris [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2019
    Member:
    #300216
    Messages:
    837
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Cristian
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    2021 4runner Lunar Rock Trd Pro 2004 Xtra xab red
    None
    Don’t see why your complaining 19.5 is way better than 14.5.
     
    BillsSR5[QUOTED] likes this.
  5. Feb 27, 2020 at 9:52 AM
    #5
    thenodnarb

    thenodnarb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Member:
    #280389
    Messages:
    237
    Gender:
    Male
    California
    Vehicle:
    2001 TRD 4x4 379k and counting
    if you check the mpg threads on this site from back in like 2012, we were all getting better mpg. of course the vehicles where not so old then, but Ive been trying to determine the objective reason besides just the "old truck" comments.

    ive had my truck since new and i used to get minimum 18mpg town and up to 24mpg highway. now i get as low as 11 mpg town and 19 highway but usually about 14 or 15 mixed. i have a v6 4x4 fyi. i also get better mpg in certain states. Arizona and New Mexico i got better mileage than California and Texas. Texas gas was real bad. like 15.5 highway. but it was half the cost of Cali gas.

    ethanol gas is part of the reason i believe for the poor mpg these days. despite the government's propaganda that ethanol doesn't hurt mpg.
    besides that i believe dirty or leaking injectors might be one of the bigger factors. another theory is worn piston rings and valves that need adjustment.

    other factors that cause poor mpg that some of us on this forum have addressed is a clogged catalytic converter, very old o2 sensors, dragging brakes, etc...

    first step is a tuneup with new spark plugs and wires, air filter and replace old vacuum lines. then make sure your tires are stock street tires( if you care about getting stock mpg figures). after that start looking into the things i mentioned
     
  6. Feb 27, 2020 at 9:57 AM
    #6
    tarbal255

    tarbal255 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2018
    Member:
    #276386
    Messages:
    640
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dave
    Vehicle:
    19 Taco SR
    Any chance you are getting e15 (15% ethanol) in your state? I think the government just approved its use last year from the old e10
     
  7. Feb 27, 2020 at 10:14 AM
    #7
    jbrandt

    jbrandt Made you look

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Member:
    #51038
    Messages:
    17,616
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Justin
    El Dorado, CA (NOT El Dorado Hills)
    Vehicle:
    '04 TRD Tacoma 4x4 DC
    Kings, J59's Total Chaos UCAs Custom skids Sticker mod
    You're looking at a 2% or less difference for e15 fuels compared to "normal" fuel.

    https://ethanolrfa.org/2012/07/use-of-e15-in-your-automobile/

    OP has a ~15% reduction. His issue is more than likely MAF, IAC valve, and any of the other regular maintenance items discussed in the numerous MPG threads.

    Also, e15 has been around since ~2001
     
  8. Feb 27, 2020 at 10:29 AM
    #8
    thenodnarb

    thenodnarb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Member:
    #280389
    Messages:
    237
    Gender:
    Male
    California
    Vehicle:
    2001 TRD 4x4 379k and counting
    that's the BS govt statements I'm referring to. i don't believe it. but even according to their statement, e15 has 2% less energy density than e10. my truck at least wasnt designed to work with e10 despite being made in 2001. being able to use it and designed to use it are two very different things. i don't want to hijack this thread into a debate on ethanol. and my seat of the pants gut feeling isn't authoritative, but i still think it contributes to generally lower mpg than when our trucks were made.
     
  9. Feb 27, 2020 at 10:41 AM
    #9
    jbrandt

    jbrandt Made you look

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Member:
    #51038
    Messages:
    17,616
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Justin
    El Dorado, CA (NOT El Dorado Hills)
    Vehicle:
    '04 TRD Tacoma 4x4 DC
    Kings, J59's Total Chaos UCAs Custom skids Sticker mod
    If you don't believe a long standing published statistic based on nothing but your seat of the pants feeling and a general distrust of the government, then there's nothing I can add.

    Double or even triple the loss in MPGs from e15, and that's not nearly enough to account for the OPs drop anyway.
     
    JasonLee, ericvega and otis24 like this.
  10. Feb 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM
    #10
    BillsSR5

    BillsSR5 Looking out for #1

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2017
    Member:
    #216032
    Messages:
    8,654
    First Name:
    bill
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5
    true, but I got the truck to use as a daily driver and figured on getting 20mpgs or more no matter what the season or situation, my old 2004 with a 3.4l v6 i could bank on getting 20.5mpgs like clock work
     
  11. Feb 27, 2020 at 11:10 AM
    #11
    thenodnarb

    thenodnarb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Member:
    #280389
    Messages:
    237
    Gender:
    Male
    California
    Vehicle:
    2001 TRD 4x4 379k and counting
    :rolleyes:

    way to get that upper hand. you win the internet today bud. :thumbsup:

    btw i didn't attribute any particular amount to OPs mpg. i just think it's probably more than the stated theoretical difference of 5% of E15 to pure gas. probably due to the fact that our 1st gens weren't designed to use gas with ethanol. i don't doubt that modern cars properly designed for it can run it with no problem. less compression especially as the truck gets older probably leads to less complete combustion exacerbated by the ethanol which i believe requires higher compression to burn completely. we're taking a bigger hit to mpg than theoretical idealized published govt data which is based on modern cars.
     
  12. Feb 27, 2020 at 12:25 PM
    #12
    Notcris

    Notcris [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2019
    Member:
    #300216
    Messages:
    837
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Cristian
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    2021 4runner Lunar Rock Trd Pro 2004 Xtra xab red
    None
    Well I’ve seen older 4Runners getting 16-19
     
  13. Feb 27, 2020 at 1:11 PM
    #13
    otis24

    otis24 Hard Shell Taco

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2012
    Member:
    #92402
    Messages:
    6,484
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mark
    California
    Vehicle:
    OtisBound Outdoors Bodonkadonk
    OtisBound Bodonkadonk
    How long ago were you getting 16-17mpgs?

    Was it a gradual decline or was it drastic...like from one tank to the next?

    Any changes to your truck in that time?

    Do you track your mpgs in a sorta verifiable reliable way? For example I use fuelly but because I have 2 fuel tanks and my filling pattern is variable plus unaccounted for tire size makes fuelly unreliable. On the other hand my motorcycle and car are tracked with consistantancy and are probably about dead on accurate.
     
  14. Feb 27, 2020 at 8:23 PM
    #14
    96GreenTaco

    96GreenTaco New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2020
    Member:
    #320561
    Messages:
    1
    Gender:
    Female
    Vehicle:
    1996 Green Toyota Tacoma
    We have a 96 Taco about ready to roll 300k. My teenager drives it and the MPG has tanked recently. He is replacing the O2 sensors now.
    He doesn't have the CC in it anymore, new clutch recently, aggressive street tires on it.
    What MPG are you guys getting on the higher mileage tacomas?
     
  15. Feb 27, 2020 at 8:39 PM
    #15
    jbrandt

    jbrandt Made you look

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Member:
    #51038
    Messages:
    17,616
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Justin
    El Dorado, CA (NOT El Dorado Hills)
    Vehicle:
    '04 TRD Tacoma 4x4 DC
    Kings, J59's Total Chaos UCAs Custom skids Sticker mod
    I know exactly why his MPGs went down, lol, it's not the o2 censor, lol.

    The car I drove in highschool was getting some outside wear on the front tires. so my dad and I went in for an alignment. Tech said the alignment was perfect and I just needed to slow down on the corners...

    BUSTED! :D

    People typically get anywhere from 15 to 19, all depends on tires, 4x4, v6, but mostly just how you drive. Some claim they get 25 in their 4x4s, lol...

    A clean MAF and a few other regular maintenance items can't hurt, the the #1 factor is that right foot.
     
  16. Feb 27, 2020 at 8:48 PM
    #16
    El Taco Diablo

    El Taco Diablo Professional Pinstriper

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2017
    Member:
    #235223
    Messages:
    13,979
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt - KN6DZP
    Hughson, CA
    Vehicle:
    Impulse Red DC, 5vz-fe, 4wd swap, LT, dual case, F/R locked
    Just 3 tons of fun!!!

    "Long standing published statistics" (from the Government)?

    Aren't these the same people who regulate the bullshit MPG numbers posted on the windows of new cars? Does anyone actually believe those numbers?


    He has a point about the ethanol... our trucks weren't designed to run ethanol (at all) we see a drop in milage at e10... the difference between e10 and e15 would not be straight across... it would be compounded.

    IE the milage decrease would not be a straight line on a graph... meaning it would not be say 5% drop from e0 to e5 and then a 5% drop from e5 to e10 the drop would be a higher precentage each time you add additional e to the mix (these are not real numbers, just examples).

    And as our motors wear more and more... It is not out of the realm to believe the drop in milage numbers would be even further exacerbated by the ethanol.


    Absolutely everything else being suggested here (tire pressure, o2 sensors, cat conv, etc etc) are also definate potential contributors... but I think it's short sighted to look past the gas. I have personally noticed a difference when the summer blend gas here in CA goes in and out... not so much any more because I think they have us on summer blend (excuse to make it more expensive) year round now.
     
  17. Feb 27, 2020 at 9:05 PM
    #17
    jbrandt

    jbrandt Made you look

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Member:
    #51038
    Messages:
    17,616
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Justin
    El Dorado, CA (NOT El Dorado Hills)
    Vehicle:
    '04 TRD Tacoma 4x4 DC
    Kings, J59's Total Chaos UCAs Custom skids Sticker mod
    I guess I just don't have that much of a general disdain for the government in this case. They spew plenty of bad policies, for sure. Being that I'm one of those lazy yet willing do everything I can to lie about data government workers, maybe I'm biased.

    What's funny though is that the testing I was referring to (my earlier link) wasn't even a government site, it was a trade organization, and they were citing work by various other trade organizations, along with the government studies and academic research.

    My hatred for ethanol fuel has more to do with using food as a fuel, rather than, you know, eating it. But that's a different conversation entirely.
     
    cruiserguy and 0xDEADBEEF like this.
  18. Feb 27, 2020 at 9:18 PM
    #18
    0xDEADBEEF

    0xDEADBEEF Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2019
    Member:
    #285037
    Messages:
    19,847
    Vehicle:
    2000 reg cab 4x4 flatbed MT
    We should just compile a copy-pasta of all the common mpg issues on these things.

    • o2 sensor(s)
    • maf sensor
    • cracked exhaust manifold(s)
    • leaky injector(s)
    • lead foot
    • big heavy tires
    • the wrong gears
    • etc

    Its really hard to guess without sitting down and looking at the vehicle and some data.
     
    jbrandt likes this.
  19. Feb 27, 2020 at 10:04 PM
    #19
    TacoBike

    TacoBike The Researcher

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2018
    Member:
    #260787
    Messages:
    854
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mason
    Shingle Springs, California
    Vehicle:
    2000 3.4 Ext Cab TRD 4x4 with original SC
    ARP head studs Supercharger FIC6 AFR gauge painted fenders audio install
    Could also be that every bearing in the truck is old and takes out efficiency, even one slightly bad idler pulley can hurt gas mileage by a little bit. Best way to truly check the difference of the gas or air quality etc would be to change every bearing, fluid, and piece of rubber, also a complete rebuild of the engine and transmission.
     
  20. Feb 27, 2020 at 10:12 PM
    #20
    0xDEADBEEF

    0xDEADBEEF Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2019
    Member:
    #285037
    Messages:
    19,847
    Vehicle:
    2000 reg cab 4x4 flatbed MT
    OP is getting the about MPG I get when I'm towing a 6x12 U-haul trailer. Something is obviously broken and you won't have to disassemble the truck to find it.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top