LT classifieds

Ditto; how much on the bypasses? Lol

 

How much for the 10" KC's?

 

\King 12" 2.5 triples in black 2 pairs

https://classifieds.race-dezert.com/FOR_SALE:King-2.5-Bypass-Shocks-12-Inch-153921

New ×2 king 3.5x16 4 tube bypass race series tube lay out to clear beams brand new $3000

New ×2 king 2.5x14 coilovers with remote resis $900

New x2 king 2.5x14 coilovers remote resis with 2" extended rod ends. $900

New ×4 king 2.5x4 bumps ×2 4130 cans $1200

https://classifieds.race-dezert.com/FOR_SALE:Parting-out-beamed-ranger-build-153786

@FlapJack935

2nd Gen TC LT

https://classifieds.race-dezert.com/FOR_SALE:Toyota-Tacoma-GEN-2-Long-Travel-Kit-153625

Fox 3.0 12" 4 tubes black

https://classifieds.race-dezert.com/FOR_SALE2)-sets-New-Black-Fox-Shocks---3.0-x-12"-Quadruple-Bypass-153200

3.0 18" Triple Bypass- $1500
2.5 16" Double Bypass- $850
2.5 16" Dual Rate Coilovers- $800
4" Air Bumps (spacer currently installed shortening to 2")- $240

https://classifieds.race-dezert.com/FOR_SALE:Used-King-Shocks-153799

 

@GT7 grab the first ones. 12” triple bypass.

 

I already got 12” shocks just not bypasses. I just ordered my archive stuff yesterday so no money anyways

 

Didn’t remember if you had them or not.

 

I don’t think those bypasses would fit the Archive kit, I was told remote only. I put a 14” triple in there, kinda wish I had put a 12”.

 

I converted a pair of bypasses to remote - not too much work unless you don't want to take them apart.

 

Ahh, that’s true. Even still, a 2.5 bypass has to be the right tube layout, even with the tubes facing forward and 1.25 spacers, I’m close to rubbing tubes on articulation.

 

That TC kit has been for sale for awhile now.

 

Why do you say a 12"? I thought you were extremely happy with the 14".

 

Yeah I've posted it a couple times.

 

It's definitely a complete kit and pretty much ready for install. Not sure about the pricing, I haven't added up everything.

 

Can’t utilize a 14” with soa.

 

You can make a SOA cycle 14" of travel, or close to it. Just takes a lot of work and the right equipment. Unless you're specifically talking about bypass'?

 

I’m sure it is possible, but it wouldn’t be clean travel. When I was soa with a shackle flip and extended shackles my leafs would start separating before I could fully droop out my 12” shocks. So if you were strictly rock crawling and didn’t care about leaf separation I’m sure you could run long enough shackles to droop out some 14” shocks. But at that you’re probably not utilizing the full bump travel of the shocks.

 

Yep, 14" is possible but you are going to get leaf separation on droop, inverted springs on bump, or a combination of both.

 

Likely going to have some separation on the droop and it'll be tight to utilize all of the shock stroke on bump travel. Forgive me if this is known knowledge, but what is the negative of leaf separation at droop?

 

I dont know how detrimental it is but when you droop out leaf springs to the point where they are separating or compress them to the point where they are inverting you are just really pushing the limits of the springs and decreasing the life span and increasing the risk of them breaking. Is it possible for them to function fine under those parameters? Sure. Is there a higher risk that they will break or wear out faster? Probably.

I had 14s with SOA prior to going long travel. It worked fine. Nothing wrong with it but I really only used about 10-11" of the travel range most of the time. You really need the perfect terrain to get it to flex the full 14".

 

@snowsk8air2 hit it right on the money. I am still happy, and I’ll make it work with some modifications (rewelding lower shock mount and tuning bumpstops). I’m using 4.9” shackles and it does help droop out the leafs. The main negative I have with the 14” is the bypass, IE where it sits in the tube zones at ride height right now and the lack of bump travel. I am sure glad I ordered a welded lower rod end though, that shortened up the compressed length by 1”.