1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

MAGPUL Leaving CO?

Discussion in 'Guns & Hunting' started by sammy87, Feb 18, 2013.

  1. Feb 23, 2013 at 2:59 PM
    #61
    DHwreckage

    DHwreckage Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Member:
    #88868
    Messages:
    412
    Gender:
    Male
    Boulder, CO
    Vehicle:
    Moby Dick (FZJ-80)

    HEY im an ex-californian and in no way agree with these new stricter laws....theses laws dont affect criminals in anyway because regardless they are just going to go around laws! They only affect people who follow the law which sucks for us....
     
  2. Feb 23, 2013 at 9:11 PM
    #62
    Ostrichsak

    Ostrichsak Don't taze me bro!

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Member:
    #76327
    Messages:
    7,990
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jer
    Northern Colorado, USA
    Vehicle:
    Supercharged '10 Tacoma 4x4 TRD
    TRD Supercharger, aFe CAI (same as TRD 1st gen) w/Dry Filter, URD 2.85" Stealth Pulley, custom exhaust system, 5100's front & rear, TSB rear springs, 55 watt Xenon HID hi/lo 4500k Headlights, 35 watt 3000k yellow fog lights, fogs on w/headlights mod in sig, tinted side windows & windshield, Kenwood Navigation Unit, 5mm wide-angle flush mount LEDs in orange tied into illumination circuit to light up all storage & cubby areas at night, DEI Alarm, remote start w/cell phone control that works from anywhere, Custom electric roof mount rifle rack for LMT AR15
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdhXSj-DL1A
     
  3. Feb 23, 2013 at 11:49 PM
    #63
    Colt1195

    Colt1195 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Member:
    #94133
    Messages:
    257
    Gender:
    Male
    The new Colorado law would NOT prohibit possession of 15 rd magazines if they were owned prior to the ban's effective date.

    Since pre-ban mags dont have date stamps or serial numbers than stock up now.
     
  4. Feb 24, 2013 at 8:18 AM
    #64
    NvrSumR

    NvrSumR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Member:
    #59543
    Messages:
    377
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Colorado
    How dumb! (but good for gun owners). What's to stop someone from driving to Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Kansas or Nebraska and buying a bunch and claiming they've owned them before the law took effect. The law will do nothing other than be a feather in the cap of "them".
     
  5. Feb 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM
    #65
    wileyC

    wileyC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Member:
    #65685
    Messages:
    2,924
    Gender:
    Male
    Centerville, OH
    Vehicle:
    2012 PreRunner Double Cab TRD Sport
  6. Feb 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM
    #66
    wileyC

    wileyC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Member:
    #65685
    Messages:
    2,924
    Gender:
    Male
    Centerville, OH
    Vehicle:
    2012 PreRunner Double Cab TRD Sport
    well of course! ...and your're right, ...this is being done for one reason, and one reason only: orthodoxy/ideology and arm twisting from nat'l ideologues... it's about scoring a political victory, and controlling people...

    ...like NY, the rural counties will probably nullify it by not complying and so will the CLEOs...
     
  7. Feb 24, 2013 at 11:21 AM
    #67
    Colt1195

    Colt1195 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Member:
    #94133
    Messages:
    257
    Gender:
    Male
    well the new law DOES ban and criminalize importation of 15 rd magazines after the implimentation date so you dont want to get caught doing that.

    however, if you assert your right to remain silent and dont answer questions then just like here in California, its nearly impossible for the government goonz to prove where and when the magazines entered the state and prosecution becomes very difficult.
     
  8. Feb 24, 2013 at 8:21 PM
    #68
    Ostrichsak

    Ostrichsak Don't taze me bro!

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Member:
    #76327
    Messages:
    7,990
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jer
    Northern Colorado, USA
    Vehicle:
    Supercharged '10 Tacoma 4x4 TRD
    TRD Supercharger, aFe CAI (same as TRD 1st gen) w/Dry Filter, URD 2.85" Stealth Pulley, custom exhaust system, 5100's front & rear, TSB rear springs, 55 watt Xenon HID hi/lo 4500k Headlights, 35 watt 3000k yellow fog lights, fogs on w/headlights mod in sig, tinted side windows & windshield, Kenwood Navigation Unit, 5mm wide-angle flush mount LEDs in orange tied into illumination circuit to light up all storage & cubby areas at night, DEI Alarm, remote start w/cell phone control that works from anywhere, Custom electric roof mount rifle rack for LMT AR15
    Shhh.. this is a well known flaw of the bill. Let's not post such things on public forums to give them ample time to amend the bill to correct these oversights.
     
  9. Feb 24, 2013 at 8:22 PM
    #69
    Ostrichsak

    Ostrichsak Don't taze me bro!

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Member:
    #76327
    Messages:
    7,990
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jer
    Northern Colorado, USA
    Vehicle:
    Supercharged '10 Tacoma 4x4 TRD
    TRD Supercharger, aFe CAI (same as TRD 1st gen) w/Dry Filter, URD 2.85" Stealth Pulley, custom exhaust system, 5100's front & rear, TSB rear springs, 55 watt Xenon HID hi/lo 4500k Headlights, 35 watt 3000k yellow fog lights, fogs on w/headlights mod in sig, tinted side windows & windshield, Kenwood Navigation Unit, 5mm wide-angle flush mount LEDs in orange tied into illumination circuit to light up all storage & cubby areas at night, DEI Alarm, remote start w/cell phone control that works from anywhere, Custom electric roof mount rifle rack for LMT AR15
    Yeah, that dude is awesome.
     
  10. Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM
    #70
    Colt1195

    Colt1195 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Member:
    #94133
    Messages:
    257
    Gender:
    Male
    its not a worry. the lawmakers knew it would be impossible to have a retroactive ban. even ultra gun grabbing california knew it.

    its all going to be temporary though because there is a very good chance SCOTUS will strike down magazine capacity limits.
     
  11. Feb 24, 2013 at 10:28 PM
    #71
    Ostrichsak

    Ostrichsak Don't taze me bro!

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Member:
    #76327
    Messages:
    7,990
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jer
    Northern Colorado, USA
    Vehicle:
    Supercharged '10 Tacoma 4x4 TRD
    TRD Supercharger, aFe CAI (same as TRD 1st gen) w/Dry Filter, URD 2.85" Stealth Pulley, custom exhaust system, 5100's front & rear, TSB rear springs, 55 watt Xenon HID hi/lo 4500k Headlights, 35 watt 3000k yellow fog lights, fogs on w/headlights mod in sig, tinted side windows & windshield, Kenwood Navigation Unit, 5mm wide-angle flush mount LEDs in orange tied into illumination circuit to light up all storage & cubby areas at night, DEI Alarm, remote start w/cell phone control that works from anywhere, Custom electric roof mount rifle rack for LMT AR15
    We shall see. They just upheld a ruling that a citizens right to conceal carry isn't upheld by the 2nd amendment. The SCOTUS isn't really where I want to hang my hopes when it comes to firearms these days.
     
  12. Feb 24, 2013 at 10:31 PM
    #72
    JRFugitt

    JRFugitt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Member:
    #88749
    Messages:
    559
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Justin
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    '13 PreRunner V6
    I think Texas would be a great home for MagPul!
     
  13. Feb 24, 2013 at 11:51 PM
    #73
    Colt1195

    Colt1195 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Member:
    #94133
    Messages:
    257
    Gender:
    Male

    Thats completly wrong. The 7th circuit just overturned Illinios ban on concealed carry permits in Moore vs Madigan.

    http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/Q31FFRZF.pdf

    That case is now most likely going to the SCOTUS and most people believe they will uphold the decision.

    When you consider the Heller decision and McDonald decision the SCOTUS is pretty much kicking ass for the 2nd Amendment in the last 4 years.
     
  14. Feb 25, 2013 at 12:06 AM
    #74
    ninernation

    ninernation Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    Member:
    #92560
    Messages:
    78
    Gender:
    Male
    The circular graphic is manufature date on Pmags
    [​IMG]
     
  15. Feb 25, 2013 at 7:27 AM
    #75
    Ostrichsak

    Ostrichsak Don't taze me bro!

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Member:
    #76327
    Messages:
    7,990
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jer
    Northern Colorado, USA
    Vehicle:
    Supercharged '10 Tacoma 4x4 TRD
    TRD Supercharger, aFe CAI (same as TRD 1st gen) w/Dry Filter, URD 2.85" Stealth Pulley, custom exhaust system, 5100's front & rear, TSB rear springs, 55 watt Xenon HID hi/lo 4500k Headlights, 35 watt 3000k yellow fog lights, fogs on w/headlights mod in sig, tinted side windows & windshield, Kenwood Navigation Unit, 5mm wide-angle flush mount LEDs in orange tied into illumination circuit to light up all storage & cubby areas at night, DEI Alarm, remote start w/cell phone control that works from anywhere, Custom electric roof mount rifle rack for LMT AR15
    You should check your own facts before calling someone 'completely wrong' because in this case I'm completely right.

    Federal court says concealed handgun permits not protected by the 2nd Amendment.

    This was a Colorado case that was appealed and failed on Friday. This thread is a discussion about Colorado and it's pending bills. How am I 'completely wrong' again?
     
  16. Feb 25, 2013 at 8:43 AM
    #76
    Colt1195

    Colt1195 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Member:
    #94133
    Messages:
    257
    Gender:
    Male

    Sorry, you are not "completely wrong", you are just "mostly wrong". That case basically has no significance because it dealt with the narrow issue of non resident concealed carry permits.
     
  17. Feb 25, 2013 at 8:45 AM
    #77
    Colt1195

    Colt1195 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Member:
    #94133
    Messages:
    257
    Gender:
    Male
    wrent those the magazines made during the period where date stamps were required ?
     
  18. Feb 25, 2013 at 8:55 AM
    #78
    Ostrichsak

    Ostrichsak Don't taze me bro!

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Member:
    #76327
    Messages:
    7,990
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jer
    Northern Colorado, USA
    Vehicle:
    Supercharged '10 Tacoma 4x4 TRD
    TRD Supercharger, aFe CAI (same as TRD 1st gen) w/Dry Filter, URD 2.85" Stealth Pulley, custom exhaust system, 5100's front & rear, TSB rear springs, 55 watt Xenon HID hi/lo 4500k Headlights, 35 watt 3000k yellow fog lights, fogs on w/headlights mod in sig, tinted side windows & windshield, Kenwood Navigation Unit, 5mm wide-angle flush mount LEDs in orange tied into illumination circuit to light up all storage & cubby areas at night, DEI Alarm, remote start w/cell phone control that works from anywhere, Custom electric roof mount rifle rack for LMT AR15
    Read it again because the basis of the ruling was what I said several times... The 10th circuit court stated very clearly: The right to conceal carry was NOT protected by the 2nd amendment.
     
  19. Feb 25, 2013 at 8:56 AM
    #79
    Ostrichsak

    Ostrichsak Don't taze me bro!

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Member:
    #76327
    Messages:
    7,990
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jer
    Northern Colorado, USA
    Vehicle:
    Supercharged '10 Tacoma 4x4 TRD
    TRD Supercharger, aFe CAI (same as TRD 1st gen) w/Dry Filter, URD 2.85" Stealth Pulley, custom exhaust system, 5100's front & rear, TSB rear springs, 55 watt Xenon HID hi/lo 4500k Headlights, 35 watt 3000k yellow fog lights, fogs on w/headlights mod in sig, tinted side windows & windshield, Kenwood Navigation Unit, 5mm wide-angle flush mount LEDs in orange tied into illumination circuit to light up all storage & cubby areas at night, DEI Alarm, remote start w/cell phone control that works from anywhere, Custom electric roof mount rifle rack for LMT AR15
    No, Pmags didn't exist during the AWB which expired in 2004 and the Pmag debuted at SHOT show in 2007.
     
  20. Feb 25, 2013 at 9:35 AM
    #80
    Colt1195

    Colt1195 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Member:
    #94133
    Messages:
    257
    Gender:
    Male
    I havent read the entire ruling yet but I have read the analysis of it and I have been familiar with this case for awhile.

    http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/11/11-1149.pdf

    We now have split circuit courts (10th vs 7th) in regards to rulings on concealed carry. This makes it more likely that SCOTUS will hear the issue and thats a good thing.

    My original post on this issue was a response to your statement that you have little faith in SCOTUS.

    The current court is probably the most gun rights friendly court America has ever had. There is no other way to view Heller and McDonald except as major victories for gun rights and the 2nd Amendment.

    This is the court that is going to hear the concealed carry issue.

    There is a 80% chance they will rule in favor of concealed carry permits.
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2013
To Top