1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

mud tires vs A/T's

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by dustinclm, Oct 4, 2010.

  1. Oct 4, 2010 at 7:32 PM
    #1
    dustinclm

    dustinclm [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Member:
    #34553
    Messages:
    500
    Gender:
    Male
    Thibodaux, La
    Vehicle:
    2012 Super White DC 4x4 V6
    Bilstein 5100 set at .85" WeatherTech Floor Mats
    Im thinking of getting rid of my mud tires off of my 2.7L, im considering putting A/T's since i dont do much mud ridding anymore and looking for a little more MPG's and acceleration...i currently have a 3" lift and 265/75 Destination M/T's and thinking of going to BFG A/T's or something similar...Would the same size A/T tires accomplish this or could i go slightly bigger to 33's but a litte narrower tire?
     
  2. Oct 4, 2010 at 7:35 PM
    #2
    jandrews

    jandrews Hootin' and Hollerin'

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18122
    Messages:
    16,432
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 FourDubDee TRD OR
    A-TRUCK, Fat Kid in the Bed, Custom Pinstriping, Ported and Polished Muffler Bearing, Hi-Performance Bed Mat
    Going to a larger AT is only going to worsen your MPG and acceleration from stop more. Physics. More rolling stock = more sluggish.

    Bottom line, you want lighter wheels/tires and preferably less rolling resistance (which typically means less aggressive tread).
     
  3. Oct 4, 2010 at 7:37 PM
    #3
    08pretaco

    08pretaco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Member:
    #9502
    Messages:
    9,314
    Gender:
    Male
    az
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra 4x4 CM 5.7L SR5
    @ADSracingshocks - F 3 point ohh / R 2.5 - w/clickers @camburgracing - uniball UCA @rigidindustries - 40" amber/white split, Dually XL, D2 @coopertires - 35/12.5/17 STT MAXX @bayareametalfab - low pro bed rack @toyotausa - 17" rock warrior @sdhqoffroad - rock sliders, a-pillar @hondogarage / @apple / @gaiagps / @dualgps- navigation @wheelersoffroadinc - superbumps
    Mud terrain = less mileage most of the time due to thread design, more friction. Depends on the type of driving you want to do. If you are really looking to go mud bogging with your 2.7 2wd then go ahead, they should help tremendously. If you do trails and such without a lot of mud then stick with an A/T. I just moved to Cooper ST and they are amazing! I love them so so much more than my old M/T. I have only taken them in sand but they seemed to outperform the old set and really do a great job and step up when they need to!

    I went from a 265/75/16 (36lbs) mud terrain getting 75% freeway 25% city and 24 mpg. Currently have 255/75/16 (38 lbs) 75% freeway and 25% city getting 23.46.
     
  4. Oct 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM
    #4
    dustinclm

    dustinclm [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Member:
    #34553
    Messages:
    500
    Gender:
    Male
    Thibodaux, La
    Vehicle:
    2012 Super White DC 4x4 V6
    Bilstein 5100 set at .85" WeatherTech Floor Mats
    i dont do much mudding anymore...besides driving around the city for college, i if i do any off roading it can be handled by A/T's and i think A/T's will make it a little easier on my truck when pulling my boat...i also dont know if the A/Ts will look a little smaller with my left and im trying to avoind that...here is what im currently running and kind of want to keep the same look with the A/T's
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Oct 5, 2010 at 6:14 AM
    #5
    Tacoyota

    Tacoyota senile member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Member:
    #20028
    Messages:
    2,931
    Gender:
    Male
    North of Cali, South of Canada
    Vehicle:
    08 4wd
    4.56 gears, rear trutrac,DT header, 235/85r16 Duratracs, 2nd filter pulled, inter.wipers, Cruise control, Factory alum. whls/winter tires(2nd set), Afe pro Dry-S , Dumbo eared flaps cut down.
    your next narrower size , practically , would be 245/75 , not sure if yours is 15 or 16" rims. If you bought 245/75 r16 , I dont think they would look " small" but they might.
    You would have a narrower tire , lighter tire , smaller diameter , and smoother tread. All contribute to mpg or acceleration overall.
     
  6. Oct 5, 2010 at 11:39 AM
    #6
    dustinclm

    dustinclm [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Member:
    #34553
    Messages:
    500
    Gender:
    Male
    Thibodaux, La
    Vehicle:
    2012 Super White DC 4x4 V6
    Bilstein 5100 set at .85" WeatherTech Floor Mats
    Thanks. I have 16" stock rims. I'm just trying to avoid a "small" looking tire bc of my lift but keep the look I want. But I know it all boils down to personal opinion
     
  7. Oct 5, 2010 at 6:41 PM
    #7
    06dak

    06dak Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Member:
    #5122
    Messages:
    259
    Gender:
    Male
    Central Ohio
    Vehicle:
    05 PreRunner SR5 4cyl
    Undercover hard tonneau, Husky front liners
    Also look for the weight of the tire... BFGs are hella heavy, and all that unsprung mass makes for some slow acceleration and handling!
     
  8. Oct 6, 2010 at 10:58 PM
    #8
    matluth

    matluth Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    Member:
    #41409
    Messages:
    11
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Aurora, CO
    Vehicle:
    Tundra SR5 double cab lifted
    3 inch lift, front spacers, rear add a leaf. Westin Ultimate Bull Bar
    I just dumped my stock Dunlop Grand Treks for a set of Good Year Dura Tracs, LT245/75R/16's. I have the TSB 4 leaf upgrade which actually raised the rear 3.5 inches. Need to lift the front at least 1.5 inch. I prefer a rake, but not too much. Here in the western part of Colorado (Rocky Mountains) there is not much mud, only 120 yrs+ old mining roads. Mostly bedrock issues (clearance). I think this tire will be a very good all around tire for you. I can only assume the tires would be adequate for mud. Taller tires are not necessarily better. Keep in mind gear ratios. I would think in Louisiana the conditions are certainly different than here. (Mud) Check reviews for the Dura Trac. Good tires if you hit the mud occasionally. Great for every thing else. Taller tires would be O.K , but go narrower. Talk to loggers. They will tell you tall and narrow will be good.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top