1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Need opinions: 4.56's or 4.88's

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by Ozziwald, Oct 21, 2011.

  1. Oct 23, 2011 at 12:32 AM
    #21
    Ozziwald

    Ozziwald [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Member:
    #63329
    Messages:
    69
    Gender:
    Male

    Where exactly are you getting those numbers from?

    Using grimmjeeps calculator I came up with this which is not exactly even close to what you said.

    gears_bf4c9c033380972ef8ebb346b79c1fda129684db.jpg
     
  2. Oct 23, 2011 at 1:27 AM
    #22
    rcfreak201

    rcfreak201 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Member:
    #40660
    Messages:
    6,065
    Gender:
    Male
    Seems kinda inaccurate. I monitored my rpm coming home tonight. At 70 I'm at 2800. I have 35s with 4.88s
     
  3. Oct 23, 2011 at 1:53 AM
    #23
    Ozziwald

    Ozziwald [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Member:
    #63329
    Messages:
    69
    Gender:
    Male
    Possible the tranny is different? What kind of gas milage are you getting?
     
  4. Oct 23, 2011 at 7:11 AM
    #24
    anethema

    anethema Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Member:
    #51833
    Messages:
    1,004
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    J
    Dawson Creek,BC
    Vehicle:
    08 TRD OR Access cab 4x4
    ARB Bumper,OEM Roof rack modded for access cab, Allpro Rock Sliders,Icon Adjustable coilovers,More Tie Downs in bed, Firestone Airbags in rear,Block heater
    Oh sorry I actually calculated with the manual tranny which has a really shitty 6th gear ratio. Automatic will be better.
     
  5. Oct 23, 2011 at 7:56 AM
    #25
    MrGrimm

    MrGrimm Mall Crawler

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Member:
    #24568
    Messages:
    2,849
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dean
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2006 Toyota Tacoma 4WD w/TRD Sport Package
    See build page
    Most of your gas loss is when you accelerate and decelerate. Larger tires and our stock gears means the engine has to put out more. Lower gearing will help in the MPG department.
     
  6. Oct 23, 2011 at 10:39 AM
    #26
    rcfreak201

    rcfreak201 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Member:
    #40660
    Messages:
    6,065
    Gender:
    Male
    12-13 city, 15-16 highway
     
  7. Oct 23, 2011 at 11:01 AM
    #27
    cummins6speed

    cummins6speed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Member:
    #12426
    Messages:
    1,809
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '05 4Runner Limited Edition
    Custom extended travel 2.5" King RR coilovers, 1.25" Camburg uniball uppers, homebuilt tube bumper
    You aren't going to get much of your milage loss back. When you were calculating your milage were you compensating for the difference in tire size?

    A 35 is almost 13% larger than the stock tire so when you calculate your MPG you should be adding 13% to your odometer reading. If you weren't doing that, you were actually getting better milage than you were calculating and when you re-gear you may calculate better milage when you aren't actually getting better milage
     
  8. Oct 23, 2011 at 4:23 PM
    #28
    Ozziwald

    Ozziwald [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Member:
    #63329
    Messages:
    69
    Gender:
    Male
    You are correct I forgot to take that into account. But taking it into account:

    Stock size circumference is 96.13.
    My 35's circumference is 110.0 inches.

    110.0/96.13 = 1.14428

    Or 14.4% larger. Meaning 12 mpg is 13.7 mpg.

    I still lost a bit over 4 mpg.

    So doing the gears won't really restore much mpg, but will get my power back. My best bet for gaining milage back, im assuming, would be to finish my intake system with the TRD intake I want, the URD MAF and a throttle body spacer. Although it prolly will only get me another 1.5-2 mpg is my guess.

     
  9. Oct 23, 2011 at 4:32 PM
    #29
    HomerTaco

    HomerTaco also HomerTaco Vendor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Member:
    #34129
    Messages:
    45,766
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    HomerTaco
    HomerTaco
    Vehicle:
    HomerTaco
    HomerTaco ...................................................................................................................................................... Core-Hurst short throw shifter & T-handle / Carbon Fiber Interior / custom console light / De-badged / leather interior / Heated Front seats / Red Line Hood Struts / Painted speaker grills /one-off TRD Satoshi Grill with 12-15 front-end swap/ Pioneer AVIC-X920BT HU / Scangauge II / Black LED Tails / Dash Mount for iPad mini / Safari Snorkel / Auto-pilot mode / Leer 100XQ Cap / 4x Innovations sliders / Rear Diff Breather Mod / front windows tinted to 35% / Brute Force Fab Hybrid Front Bumper / BAMF Rear Diff Skid / Budbuilt Skids / CBI Trail Master 2.0 rear hybrid bumper / Fox rr coils/ TC UCA's/ TC spindle gussets/ TC Cam Tab gussets / Dakar leafs / Defined Engineering shackles / All pro U bolt flip / Timbren Rear Bumpstops / BAMF LCA skids / Exhaust re-route / Fog Light anytime Mod / LowRange Off Road extended rear brake lines / ATO Shackle Flip / sectioned Bushwhacker flares / re-geared to 4.56 / ARB Front & Rear Locking Diff / ARB CKMA12 compressor / PrInSu full rack system / 1" body lift / Inchworm 4.7 crawlbox / twin stick FJ t-case / Davez off-road triple-stick kit/
    This will not do anything according to everything that I have read.
     
  10. Oct 23, 2011 at 6:37 PM
    #30
    Trapper6speed

    Trapper6speed Hacksaw engineer

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Member:
    #32752
    Messages:
    871
    Gender:
    Male
    Stock
    4.88s for 37s.
     
  11. Oct 24, 2011 at 6:25 PM
    #31
    ckblum

    ckblum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Member:
    #55674
    Messages:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Cam
    Chilliwack, BC
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma
    Bilsteins, Light Racing UCA's, Alcan's, Kragen HID's
    So on my old truck with 4.56 and 31's I was getting about 515km per tank. I put on 32's and according to what is being said here my mileage should be better even if it reads slightly worse? I was getting 450km per tank babying it once I put on the 32's. That's all highway, I filled my truck more often and used more fuel. I know for a fact because I commute everyday an hour. Even did a tune up and a drop in K&N, 2.25 exhaust and still no improvement.

    Maybe putting taller skinny tires with the same rolling resistance as the stock ones will give you better mileage on a prairie road but in real life what I've noticed is the less hard the engine has to work the less fuel it uses. In my older Toyota's and my friend's we went from 4.10's to 4.56's and noticed an improvement in mileage running 33's, we also found we didn't have to have our foot as far into the pedal as with the 4.10's.

    I'm not saying get 5.29's with 33's and you'll have great mileage, but I disagree with people thinking running 3.73 with big tires will get better mileage than re-gearing. There is a happy medium, your truck doesn't wanna work hard turning tires, especially if there was hills on your highways. There's times I drop down to 4th gear and barely have my foot in it for hills, which in my opinion is better than being in 5th and almost floored even though the RPM's are lower in 5th.
     
  12. Oct 24, 2011 at 7:25 PM
    #32
    Ozziwald

    Ozziwald [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Member:
    #63329
    Messages:
    69
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree with you here. Which is also a reason I think it is important to have any type of MT road forced and the tire spun on the wheel if the road force is really bad. While this may help with some vibrations, less force on the road may be able to help with mileage. By no means would it be very noticeable but it should be help some.

     
  13. Oct 24, 2011 at 7:56 PM
    #33
    worthywads

    worthywads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Member:
    #58841
    Messages:
    5,345
    Gender:
    Male
    Peoples Republic of Boulder
    Vehicle:
    05 5-lug access I4 Stick, 70 Challenger Vert
    I don't think anyone here is saying bigger tires should give you better mpg. Taller, wider, heavier tires increase the rolling resistance and increase the aerodynamic load. Bigger tires almost always give worse mpg. Tire model can make a big difference too, size isn't the only thing, my stock Firestones gave me 3-4 mpg better than the same size Michelins I regretfully bought.

    I don't find the same results as you on hills though, any time I downshift from high load, low rpm to lower load, higher rpm my scangauge says my mpg just got worse.

    I'm glad you proved to yourself that a K&N and exhaust didn't improve your mpg, they don't.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top