1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Next Gen Tacoma - Does Toyota care about the 4 cylinder?

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by Scott K, Apr 12, 2011.

  1. Apr 12, 2011 at 9:59 PM
    #1
    Scott K

    Scott K [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Member:
    #23391
    Messages:
    90
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Scott
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada
    Amsoil Synthetic ASL 5w30 Oil, Amsoil ATL Fuel Efficient ATF, Amsoil Severe Gear 75w90 in front/rear diffs & transfer case.
    For those of you who are 4 cylinder fans, or perhaps you might have bought the 4 cylinder if it had a bit more power, or was in more models, I'm curious if you think when the next generation of Tacoma comes out, which I speculate will probably be a 2013 model, if Toyota will actually put out a 2.7+ 4 cylinder with equvilent technology as some of their current engines?

    Currently, Toyota has 2 versions of the 2.7 liter. A car based front wheel drive engine that has I think it's 186 HP and 187 ft-lbs of torque with Dual VVT-i in some of their SUV's such as the Highlander, Venza, and the Mini-van the Sienna, and then they have the 2.7 liter in the Tacoma with Single (intake only) VVT-i, and 159 HP and 180 ft-lbs of torque. Currently, Toyota has seen significant success in the "take rate" with the beefier 4 cylinder option in said SUV/Minivans above with as high as 50% of the customers opting to get the 4 cylinder. I think a few things are helping this

    1) Toyota has paired the 4 cylinder with the 6 speed auto, which will do wonders for keeping the engine in a more appropriate power band which will enhance response and mileage

    2) Toyota seems to offer the 4 cylinder with lots of trim packages and options that the bigger V6 also has.

    3) The beefier power of the 4 cylinder is more attractive for those on the fence who want fuel economy and/or who may not be towing or towing much.

    Keep in mind that the Venza, Sienna, and Highlander are all also heavy vehicles. The Highlander is in the range of 3900 pounds, the Sienna 4 cylinder is around 4200 pounds. And I read a review of the Sienna 4 cylinder that said it had a zero to 60 time of 9.6 seconds, which, in my opinion isn't a rocket ship, but respectable. Many early to mid 2000 half ton trucks were in the range give or take.

    So my question to you is this:

    For the next generation Tacoma, do you think Toyota will make the 4 cylinder more attractive for those who maybe want a double cab 4x4, or will they limit it's options/models/breadth of its application to entry level 4x2 models and a few 4x4 models like they do now? Also, do you think they will at least give it one, if not 2 more transmission gears to give it a fighting chance?

    Perhaps I have applied some of my opinion in the above, but jeesh - Toyota, get with the program. You pride yourself as a green car company, your trucks & SUV's reputations were built on the backs of underpowered 4 cylinders such as the 22RE that went forever on only 116 HP and 140 ft-lbs of torque moving 4000+ pound rigs all day.
     
  2. Apr 13, 2011 at 4:31 AM
    #2
    Earthy

    Earthy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Member:
    #54560
    Messages:
    12
    Gender:
    Male
    Arkansaw
    Vehicle:
    07' 5 lug
    I agree that Toyota (and all car makers) need to get with the program when it comes to fuel efficiency. I have recently been looking at new trucks and am unimpressed with the fuel milage. I currently drive a gmc duramax (diesel) for hauling and thought I would get a smaller run around truck but wanted 4 doors for family. There is no or very little savings in fuel milage from my current vehicle. They need to quit having power wars and start having mpg wars if you ask me.
     
  3. Apr 13, 2011 at 4:56 AM
    #3
    MountainEarth

    MountainEarth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Member:
    #30519
    Messages:
    2,494
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bryan
    CO
    Vehicle:
    2010 TRD OR Access
    Leer 100XR Shell, BedRug mat - comfy sleeping, GT Covers microfiber seat covers, BFG All Terrains 265/70r16, Dashmat, Antennax 13" shorty antenna, Weathertech liners, Ultra Gauge, Avid Light Bar, PIAA 520 ATPs, one old dog
    Damn straight I would have gotten a 4-cylinder. I drove an 86 4Runner with a 22RE for 13 years. It was great .. bombproof. But I was in 3rd gear, floored at 40mpg going over any pass. I wanted a little more than that.

    The 4-cylinder of today is much more powerful than my old 22RE, but the Tacoma is so much heavier now, too. They need to find a way to put it on a diet.

    Plus the 4x4 4-cylinder really doesn't do that much better than the 4x4 V6 in the gas mileage department. Again, it's all that weight added with the additional drivetrain components. I think Toyota could definitely do better though. Yeah, it's a truck. But it doesn't have to be a hog.
     
  4. Apr 13, 2011 at 6:14 AM
    #4
    JEA86

    JEA86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Member:
    #39744
    Messages:
    321
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeremy
    WV
    Vehicle:
    2010 4x4
    TRD Skid Plate Toyota Exhaust Tip TRD Coilovers TRD Rear Shocks TRD Shift Knob Header AFE filter and removed 2nd air filter and fender resonator Dynomax super turbo exhaust

    i agree the old 4cly motors were bulletproof and got great mileage!

    the problem here is all the new "saftey" features that toyota and other manufactures have to put on their products.
    Case and point- i have a 1987 Honda CRX Si as my weekend fun driver, that car gets close to 40 mpg when its driven easy, now the new CR-Z gets similar mileage, and its 20 years newer, Why? its weight and gov. restrictions on the motors, you would think in 20 years we could do better on gas mileage and power as well.... guess not

    if you drive the 4x4 4cly slow and go 65 on the interstate, i have been getting 26mpg easy out of my 2010 4x4 4 cly 5speed, the key is stay out of the gas, dont rev up to the sky to shift gears it has plenty of TQ to move it around, and coast where you can. You can get very good mileage out of the 4cyl trucks
     
  5. Apr 13, 2011 at 6:41 AM
    #5
    jking3002

    jking3002 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2010
    Member:
    #37187
    Messages:
    198
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jonathan
    Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    Scion tC
    Ricer muffler, window tent, trd shift knob.
    Scott,

    I think Toyota cares a lot about the 4-bangers. In fact they are now available in some models that they weren't just a few years ago.

    It was said on here a while ago that Toyota will probably update the 2TR that our vehicles use, instead of stuffing in the 4-banger used in the SUV and minivan aplications. Just someone's opinion, but it makes sense to me. I'd look for higher torque than the current 180/187 but for lower HP than the 186. I'm betting we'll see about 190-195ish on the torque and 165-175ish on the HP. Teaming that with a 6-speed auto I think you'd see a lot more people grabbing the 4-banger. Especially within the access cabs.

    In fact, I think you'd see so many people grabbing the 4-banger (especially if it gets 10 percent better fuel economy or more), that the V6 would become more of a luxury item, with mostly only guys grabbing TRD models getting them. This would probably mean the majority of TW owners would still have the V6, but the majority of Tacoma owners as a whole would end up with the 4.

    My idea for the Tacoma 2013 is to make it a hair smaller than the current model, or at least no bigger, make the frame and suspension a little stronger, and market it directly against full size trucks. With the next gen V6 (like in the V6 Tundra) HP is now at 270. With increased frame and suspension rigidness (as well as increased breaking ability), I think you could see tow rating for the V6 tow package models above 7,000 LBS, and payload ratings around 1500LBS. I've even thought of the slogan- "Tacoma, all you need, and then some!"
     
  6. Apr 13, 2011 at 9:51 AM
    #6
    HomeGrown

    HomeGrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Member:
    #49116
    Messages:
    308
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bill
    Lexington, KY
    Vehicle:
    2011 Reg Cab 4WD
    As much as I'd like to see Toyota get serious about the 4 cyl in the Tacoma, I honestly think the only reason they offer it is for price advantage, not necessarily MPG advantage. By necessity, they need to keep the Tacoma reg cab 4 cyl, 2wd as cheap as possible to keep it a viable contender for fleet vehicle sales. They won't want to spend much on development for a truck they need to keep cheap. It would be nice if they had more powerful, technologically advanced 4 cyl. to offer as an option (or perhaps standard on a 4x4 or Prerunner model).
     
  7. Apr 13, 2011 at 7:57 PM
    #7
    Earthy

    Earthy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Member:
    #54560
    Messages:
    12
    Gender:
    Male
    Arkansaw
    Vehicle:
    07' 5 lug
    Extra weight? I don't have figures to go on but my 07 access cab has a plastic bed. Where is the extra weight coming from? The bigger cab?
     
  8. Apr 14, 2011 at 4:08 AM
    #8
    HomeGrown

    HomeGrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Member:
    #49116
    Messages:
    308
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bill
    Lexington, KY
    Vehicle:
    2011 Reg Cab 4WD
    Hybrid is a great idea, but I doubt that Toyota will adapt this technology to the Tacoma, especially the 4 cyl (my whole point once again about keeping the 4 cyl cheap). If they do anything hybrid, I wouldn't be surprised to see a Prius-based light duty truck (the ABAT comes to mind).
     
  9. Apr 14, 2011 at 10:11 AM
    #9
    HomeGrown

    HomeGrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Member:
    #49116
    Messages:
    308
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bill
    Lexington, KY
    Vehicle:
    2011 Reg Cab 4WD
    LOL, I always laugh when I see the "Hybrid" Tahoes or whatever... what a waste. It's a "preppie" hybrid.
    Can't agree with the Taco hybrid though. Hybrid is best served on a vehicle where it's built-in, not added on as an afterthought. I sure wouldn't be willing to spend an additional $5000 on a $20,000 truck for a system that will save me virtually $0 on the highway, and maybe give me an additional 5-8 mpg in the city. That's as laughable as the Tahoe hybrid.
     
  10. Apr 14, 2011 at 4:16 PM
    #10
    Scott K

    Scott K [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Member:
    #23391
    Messages:
    90
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Scott
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada
    Amsoil Synthetic ASL 5w30 Oil, Amsoil ATL Fuel Efficient ATF, Amsoil Severe Gear 75w90 in front/rear diffs & transfer case.
    A few things:

    1) The 1st gen tacoma (95-04) and the 2nd Gen Tacoma (05+) are noticeably different weight wise - around 300-400 pounds difference which is noticeable and probably negates the added power from the 3RZ-FE to the 2TR-FE from 1st to 2nd gen models.

    2) There IS a noticeable different in fuel economy between the 4.0 V6 and the 2.7 liter 4 banger. Do not get caught up in the "one engine works harder versus one has an easier job." The 4 cylinder will always have a noticeable fuel economy advantage, when you consider engines of similar technology, than the V6. I don't think we need to do a poll to prove this.

    3) It's great that someone could do with 30 HP less than the current 2TR-FE. I'd love to get back to the days of nostalgia. Perhaps it's not correct to say the 22RE was underpowered, more correct to say it had it's work cut out for it moving a 4000 +/- truck or SUV. No matter what your opinion of the current engine versus the 22RE or previous Toyota engines, to appeal to more of the masses, the current 2TR-FE 4 cylinder needs to be made more efficient - that means adding technology (e.g. Dual VVT-i) which will enhance both fuel economy and power at the same time and not neccessarily make it MORE capable, but make the capability more tolerable, if it's fair to say. Also, extra transmission gears, and an appropriate rear end ratio, on top of having appealing options comparable to most of what they offer with the V6 will increase the take rate of this engine. Keep in mind that we're not far off from INSANE fuel prices, and who knows if they are hear to stay. There are not going to be any real excuses to bring the fuel prices down with the economy on the rebound and all that. So when someone goes looking for a 4 cylinder Truck, Toyota had better have a competitive one.
     
  11. Apr 14, 2011 at 6:20 PM
    #11
    Boring

    Boring This space intentionally left blank.

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Member:
    #36129
    Messages:
    328
    Gender:
    Male
    Arizona
    Vehicle:
    5-lug
    Yes.
    If did they nothing, but add direct injection (easy for them), raise the compression ratio a bit (easy for them) and add one more transmission gear (somewhat easy for them), there will be at least 3 more MPG in both city and highway conditions. Also, it would be slightly more powerful. I would seriously consider taking a hit on my loan and getting the new model.

    I'm in favor of a slightly smaller DI turbo engine, as I said in another thread or two...
     
  12. Apr 14, 2011 at 8:25 PM
    #12
    PSJ

    PSJ Prerunners Work

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Member:
    #10620
    Messages:
    1,348
    Gender:
    Male
    Sebastian Inlet
    Vehicle:
    09 Access Cab Prerunner
    Rear Leaf spring TSB, Bilstein 5100's all around w/ front set at 1.75", 265/75R/16 Mickey Thompson Baja STZ's, Trailer hitch w/custom wiring, AFE drop in dry filter, Rear Diff breather mod, Debadged truck, customized stock TRD wheel center caps, added factory fog lights, bed mat, door sills, tinted windows
    Keep in mind this motor and the 4 cyl motors in general started it all for Toyota. This motor is a proven, iron block 4 cyl that will run a long time. I also understand the 3.0L diesel motor Toyota puts in the Hulix and other models, was developed and designed based on this motor. However, I would expect a new, higher performance and more fuel effecient motor if they go away from this motor with the Tacoma in the future. Also, expect upgrades with transmissions as well. ;)
     
  13. Apr 14, 2011 at 8:33 PM
    #13
    topgun155

    topgun155 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Member:
    #11728
    Messages:
    2,777
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Zack
    Richmond, TX or College Station, TX
    Vehicle:
    08 Prerunner V6 Black
    Viper Alarm, In Pro Car Wear L.E.D. Tail Lights, Fog Lights, ScanGuageII, AvidOffroad Light Bar, Ammo Box Mod, Tailgate Theft Prevention Mod, Satoshi Grill, Hella 500ff behind the grill, blendmount, Cruise Control Mod, Fog Light Mod, 5100's @1.75, Toytec TSB AAL 1.5".
    I think that they should spend their time on aerodynamics. With a good tailwind I can get 24mpg same when I am behind a full size pickup. If there was a way to make the Tacoma better in that department it would be money well spent by toyota.

    BTW I understand it is a truck, but I bet they could do at least a little better.
     
  14. Apr 15, 2011 at 4:50 AM
    #14
    HomeGrown

    HomeGrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Member:
    #49116
    Messages:
    308
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bill
    Lexington, KY
    Vehicle:
    2011 Reg Cab 4WD
    Aerodynamic? For some reason the Dodge Rampage comes to mind. :D

    Seriously, I think this segment of the VLT (Very Light Truck) market needs to be awakened again, but with mildly expanded capabilities and capacities. This would be a good alternative for those who want a good commuter vehicle and only occasional / limited need for a truck.

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Apr 15, 2011 at 6:35 AM
    #15
    AndrewFalk

    AndrewFalk Science!

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Member:
    #36740
    Messages:
    2,062
    Gender:
    Male
    The North East
    Vehicle:
    2010 5 speed 5 lug
    :)
    In my mind the best thing Toyota could do right now is give the 4 banger a 6 speed manual transmission. I usually shift into 5th right at 50 MPH, and when I'm cruising at 65-70 my RPM's are well over 2k. If they simply added a 6th gear that was much more of an overdrive gear, it would be much easier to achieve 30 MPG's on the highway.
     
  16. Apr 15, 2011 at 7:11 AM
    #16
    Steves104x4

    Steves104x4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Member:
    #35468
    Messages:
    6,422
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Steve
    Buffalo NY
    Vehicle:
    2010 RC 2.7 4x4
    BUCKLE UP! It makes it harder for Aliens to pull you out of your Truck.
    I need a SUPERCHARGER not a 6 speed; Damnit. :mad:


    Steve
     
  17. Apr 15, 2011 at 8:10 AM
    #17
    BigRedToy

    BigRedToy BRT

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Member:
    #15885
    Messages:
    1,888
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    07 Regular Cab SR5 4x4
    I think they should remove the 4clyd from the Regular cab 4x4s and replace it with the V6. If they did this, we could easily see 2-3+MPG increases on the highway. Also, it would require little to no work from anyone at Toyota.
     
  18. Apr 15, 2011 at 8:13 AM
    #18
    cgs2k2

    cgs2k2 Ohio Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Member:
    #35923
    Messages:
    2,280
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2006 AC 4x4 OR
    You are a crazy person.

    Also, how is somebody a poser for wanting more power out of their TRUCK.

    That's like saying you are a poser heterosexual if you like girls with bigger tits.

    Get outta here with your terrible opinions that never add anything to threads.
     
  19. Apr 15, 2011 at 8:22 AM
    #19
    BigRedToy

    BigRedToy BRT

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Member:
    #15885
    Messages:
    1,888
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    07 Regular Cab SR5 4x4
    The 5.0L, V8, in the new F150, is rated almost the same MPGs as the V6, 4.0L, Tacoma...
     
  20. Apr 15, 2011 at 9:12 AM
    #20
    JeffsJeep04

    JeffsJeep04 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Member:
    #54496
    Messages:
    77
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Menomonie, WI
    Vehicle:
    2002 2.7/5 Speed 4x4
    I think they need to come out with a new model similar in size to the old pickup/1st gen taco. There's your MPG jump right there. There is definitely room in the market for both right now, IMHO.
     
To Top