NFL Trash Talkers Thread

LOL great response

Glad you were able to back that up

 

I don't deny Smith throws short most of the time but he's still a better QB and not a bitch

 

LOL yeah ok. If that makes you feel better.

I like Alex Smith, I still have his 49er jersey. But Smith is the ultimate bitch boy. The only reason then-coach Mike Nolan and then-GM Scot McCloughan picked Smith over local boy Aaron Rodgers was because Smith was susceptible to taking orders and doing whatever they wanted to do with him.

 

I dunno, if you asked Seahawks fans to plot wins and losses on a schedule a lot of them would have had 0-2. St. Louis always plays us tough in St. Louis and GB was due. If you're a football person you're not picking 16-0. Even the best teams typically trip 2,3 or 4 times in a season. I picked it 1-1 with a win over St. Louis but I had us losing in Cincy and at one of either Cardinals, Ravens etc. I figured 12-4 or 13-3.

To me there's a big difference in Seattle's 0-2 and Indy's 0-2.

Luck has a major problem turning the ball over. He's not as perfect as everyone thought he was. I think what Pagano is saying is it's time to stop being a rookie and control the ball. It also doesn't help that Indy got older in the off season, I believe they have the oldest 53 in the NFL right now. Ask Denver from 2013 how that works out.

 

Kaepernick is a jerk but I think the previous regime inspired that. He seems to be mellowing in the "be an asshole to the media" area. He still has more upside than Smith though.. However, I think Smith might have been able to do more with the 2012-13 Niners than Kaep did just because of experience and patience.

 

Yeah, 12, meant to be man.

 

Don't remind me of 2013...

I see what you're saying but Indi was playing 2 really solid defences with the Bills and Jets. I've been a Broncos fan since back in the Kyle Orton/Brady Quinn days... however, I just can't look at a schedule and say "x team will beat us...." When I watch them play I expect them to win, of course there are games against teams like New England where I'm nervous at the start but it just feels wrong saying they'll lose or probably will lose...

 

Oh, I expect them to win and get mightily irritated when they don't. But when I look at a schedule I feel ok picking losses, every team loses on occasion.

 

Let's be honest, Brady just made the Bills defense look like a JV team, and set a record for yards gained on those cunts. They are shit, will always be shit, and their fans are fucking inbread, finger popping each other's assholes at every game, and raping drunk chicks who can't even stand up. Rex Ryan literally game planned for a year for Sunday's game, and Brady embarrassed him for the ninth fucking time. It wasn't coaching, because Belichick and Mcdaniels made some fucking terrible decisions, it was all Touchdown Tommy, jamming his crank right down Dareus' throat. The Jets are also shit - offensively. If Indy even had a solid group of Milfs playing defense for them, the Jets never would have scored a touchdown, Indy is built to lose. No money into their defense, all offensive money went to luck and TY Hilton (who sucks), and their game plan every week seems like they are going to run twice, and try a 50yd bomb. It either rarely is complete for a TD, most of the time is intercepted or goes incomplete. You can't win like that, and the Pats fuck indy's pussy every year, twice some years.

/rant

 

Yea, word 'round the campfire is Pagano's gettin' tired of Grigs shitty picks/trades and has tried going around him a couple times. I don't know if he'll finish the season with the Colts or not at this rate, honestly. he built up a lot of good PR with the whole 'Chuck Strong' thing, but you burn that shit FAST when the GM is the owner's ball-cupper

 

ermergerd, people talking about Raiders for a couple seconds. New record in here...

I guess this means they'll go all the way.

 

i bet they'll go farther then my dolphins...

 

Unfortunately you can't argue with results... offensive results that is

 

Just win (.500) baby!

 

Saints need to lose this guy.

 

Also, on that note... there's dumb statistics and then there's really shitty statistics. Stats like that don't take into consideration good teams and bad teams. I would be curious to know what the teams looked like that fall into the 12% and what the other 88% looked like. I would be willing to bet most of the 88% are bad teams, bad teams before and bad teams after. Whereas the 12% is probably good teams that just have a slow start.

That should be the least of their worries, nothing changes until this guy is gone..

 

There is a huge difference. The AFC South will most-likely only require 9 or 10 wins to capture. I really doubt that will be the case with the NFC West, unless the Rams, Seahawks, and 49ers are all mediocre/bad teams.

Luck will be fine. He's still a top-5 QB and the best young one in the NFL. The Colts put a lot on him. They have no run game and a terrible defense. Besides, during the Luck era, it has been the Colts' style to win games vs the tough opponents (SEA, SF, DEN, GB), destroy their division, and lose to mediocre teams (PIT, STL, NYJ, PHI, ARI).

 

Wow, no concerns for NE's defense?

 

Lol. Forgot who you were talkin to? Of course not. Even if there were, Tommy would be able to cover those mistakes.

 

What's wrong with this fat piece of stupid shit?