1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

O2 Simulator

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas (1995-2004)' started by Up2NoGood, Jul 21, 2021.

  1. Jul 22, 2021 at 12:31 PM
    #21
    Juisebocks

    Juisebocks Commander of the Inglorious Badger

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2019
    Member:
    #307045
    Messages:
    3,101
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 2.7L AT OPAF,DTF&PITA
    "Stock+"
    Also, FYI I just read up on 02 sensors and their signals. The expected output is an analogue voltage, not a PWM signal like a lot of other things are. If what I read is accurate, the ECU goes into an open loop until things come up to temperature and then it goes into a closed loop using the varying voltage from the sensor.

    0.1V is as lean as it can read, ~0.45v is a perfect 14.7:1 mixture, ~0.9 volts should be super rich

    YMMV I'm r-worded

    Also, shouldn't you have two O2 sensors since you use OBDII? Are yours single wire, or the heated type?
     
  2. Jul 22, 2021 at 2:22 PM
    #22
    treyus30

    treyus30 70% complete 70% of the time

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2015
    Member:
    #158054
    Messages:
    8,236
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Trey
    Mesa / AJ, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '99 5VZ-FE Twin K03s w/Haltech
    Historic plates and 2 bar
    Wideband (AFR) should be analog, Narrowband should be PWM. You're correct about open loop. WOT also causes open loop after its at operating temp.
    Heated, yes there are two, but as long as the downstream isn't completely out of sync with the first, it shouldn't require spoofing. ECU relies on the upstream for corrections. Disconnecting or fooling into never up to operating temp works for a few minutes max, then it freaks out and starts correcting based on some indeterminate factors for about 20 seconds, then throws CEL and reverts to open loop. Basically that 20 seconds is what I'm fighting here. Yes you can try to time that to occur when you're stopped, and maybe I'm unlucky, but it seems like it only likes to run its check under load. Issue is compounded by the fact you have to turn off the engine every time you make map changes on the Split Second.

    Thanks for coming to my TacoTalk™
     
    Juisebocks[QUOTED] likes this.
  3. Jul 22, 2021 at 4:13 PM
    #23
    ThunderOne

    ThunderOne Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Member:
    #17473
    Messages:
    10,042
    First Name:
    Mitchell
    Nashville
    Vehicle:
    1ST GEN OR GTFO
    Toyota NERD
     
    Juisebocks[QUOTED] likes this.
  4. Jul 22, 2021 at 7:10 PM
    #24
    Juisebocks

    Juisebocks Commander of the Inglorious Badger

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2019
    Member:
    #307045
    Messages:
    3,101
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 2.7L AT OPAF,DTF&PITA
    "Stock+"
    :101010:

    Without scoping the signal or finding it somewhere in the FSM... I dunno lol. It'd be just a shot in the dark.

    So if you just set a constant signal, what happens?
     
  5. Jul 22, 2021 at 8:42 PM
    #25
    ThunderOne

    ThunderOne Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Member:
    #17473
    Messages:
    10,042
    First Name:
    Mitchell
    Nashville
    Vehicle:
    1ST GEN OR GTFO
    Toyota NERD
    I would read through that thread I linked, a lot of the same discussion happened over there
     
    Juisebocks[QUOTED] likes this.
  6. Jul 23, 2021 at 7:32 AM
    #26
    Juisebocks

    Juisebocks Commander of the Inglorious Badger

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2019
    Member:
    #307045
    Messages:
    3,101
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 2.7L AT OPAF,DTF&PITA
    "Stock+"
    Yeah, it took them a while to get to anything worth reading, but it seems like 1 second pulses at the O2 sensor voltage seems to work for most people. Something like a 1M resistor and a 4.7uF capacitor. There was even a guy who did a capacitor and a diode to drop the voltage to .5v. So problem solved? Thanks for the good read by the way.
     
    ThunderOne[QUOTED] likes this.
  7. Jul 26, 2021 at 11:45 AM
    #27
    treyus30

    treyus30 70% complete 70% of the time

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2015
    Member:
    #158054
    Messages:
    8,236
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Trey
    Mesa / AJ, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '99 5VZ-FE Twin K03s w/Haltech
    Historic plates and 2 bar
    Does the whole thread focus on the rear O2 sensor? From the first post it sounds like they're just doping the response of the rear to make it think the catalytic converter is working at full efficiency.

    I did see some of their waveforms but I'm just gonna probe my own since I know mine work properly; I have a Siglent, I just need to put my mind on doing it.
     
  8. Jul 26, 2021 at 11:53 AM
    #28
    Juisebocks

    Juisebocks Commander of the Inglorious Badger

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2019
    Member:
    #307045
    Messages:
    3,101
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 2.7L AT OPAF,DTF&PITA
    "Stock+"
    Yes and yes. Their goal was to generate a signal that would simulate a relatively perfect burn. I think that since their method just bounces around the expected values of a clean burn without deviating too far, the computer generally accepts it. I'm willing to bet that the people who couldn't get this method to work did something wrong.
     
  9. Jul 26, 2021 at 11:58 AM
    #29
    treyus30

    treyus30 70% complete 70% of the time

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2015
    Member:
    #158054
    Messages:
    8,236
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Trey
    Mesa / AJ, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '99 5VZ-FE Twin K03s w/Haltech
    Historic plates and 2 bar
    Yaaa... Totally a secondary issue for me..if at all. I can't really remember what exactly the URD simulator did, but I was pretty sure it was for the front bank and it worked in conjunction with the FTC to artificially control ECU-seen AFRs, so that when it hit a rich cell in closed loop, it wouldn't lean back out.
    Those people actually need to get their cats changed lol. P0420 isn't just a failed sensor, it's actually telling you you have a bad cat.
     
  10. Jul 27, 2021 at 6:41 AM
    #30
    Juisebocks

    Juisebocks Commander of the Inglorious Badger

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2019
    Member:
    #307045
    Messages:
    3,101
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 2.7L AT OPAF,DTF&PITA
    "Stock+"
    Yeah, they're cheaping out in that thread. The front sensor shouldn't be hard to do. Could even use a microcontroller if you're brave.
     
  11. Jul 27, 2021 at 10:48 AM
    #31
    treyus30

    treyus30 70% complete 70% of the time

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2015
    Member:
    #158054
    Messages:
    8,236
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Trey
    Mesa / AJ, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '99 5VZ-FE Twin K03s w/Haltech
    Historic plates and 2 bar
    That's plan B
     
  12. Jul 27, 2021 at 11:49 AM
    #32
    Juisebocks

    Juisebocks Commander of the Inglorious Badger

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2019
    Member:
    #307045
    Messages:
    3,101
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 2.7L AT OPAF,DTF&PITA
    "Stock+"
    HMU if you go that route. I have some experience pixie wrangling.
     
  13. Jul 29, 2021 at 9:27 PM
    #33
    ThunderOne

    ThunderOne Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Member:
    #17473
    Messages:
    10,042
    First Name:
    Mitchell
    Nashville
    Vehicle:
    1ST GEN OR GTFO
    Toyota NERD
    Just @ me next time :rofl:

    I got the URD sim because of my P0420. I know my cats are getting old, truck has 200k+ miles, but I'll keep running it this way until I fail the sniffer test. By then, the truck will probably be an off road toy only.
     
    Juisebocks[QUOTED] likes this.
  14. Jul 30, 2021 at 5:22 AM
    #34
    Juisebocks

    Juisebocks Commander of the Inglorious Badger

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2019
    Member:
    #307045
    Messages:
    3,101
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 2.7L AT OPAF,DTF&PITA
    "Stock+"
    We still love you, bru. No shame in that game. I don't deal with emissions checks in my state and if I had to put up with some of the crazy stuff the CA guys do, I'd pull the same stunts.
     
    ThunderOne[QUOTED] likes this.
  15. Jul 31, 2021 at 10:58 AM
    #35
    Up2NoGood

    Up2NoGood [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2014
    Member:
    #132511
    Messages:
    3,302
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jaimes
    BC, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2014 TRD Sport DCLB
    Just wondering if yours shipped? I ordered one the same day as you, got a tracking number but it looks like it was never actually shipped out.
     
  16. Jul 31, 2021 at 3:09 PM
    #36
    vasinvictor

    vasinvictor Junkie

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2014
    Member:
    #138933
    Messages:
    879
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '01 DCSB racetruck
    hx35 turbo, AEM F/IC, Transgo, custom converter, CalTracs, Elocker, 2-4" drop, 4x4 conversion (2023) on a new purple powdercoated fram, 255/55r18 street, 255/60r16 M&H Racemasters, 7.6 at 91
    I just checked and it says it was delivered today the 31st!
     
  17. Aug 11, 2022 at 10:55 PM
    #37
    Bivouac

    Bivouac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2021
    Member:
    #376253
    Messages:
    11,579
    Northern Lehigh Valley Pa
    Vehicle:
    2000 Tacoma 5 speed 3.4
    Remains to be seen I bought the tires and wheels the rest came along
    Nothing like discussing a Federal Crime on the Internet!!
     
    jbrandt[QUOTED] and TACOTU3 like this.
  18. Aug 12, 2022 at 3:52 AM
    #38
    Jakuku Pahwheenis

    Jakuku Pahwheenis i provide useless forum contributions

    Joined:
    May 27, 2022
    Member:
    #398083
    Messages:
    1,098
    First Name:
    J Phoenix
    South Carolina
    Vehicle:
    2003 Xtracab 2.7L 3RZ-FE 4x4 manual 245K+ miles
    My downstream O2 sensor just hangs out smelling the fresh breeze. No codes. Am I just lucky?
     
  19. Aug 12, 2022 at 4:16 AM
    #39
    wesb1023

    wesb1023 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Member:
    #54586
    Messages:
    649
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Westley
    Eastern NC
    Vehicle:
    04 Double Cab
    It could possibly be either one. The best way to find out is get a scan tool and monitor the downstream 02 sensor with the simulator plugged in and without it plugged in. Because you have one cat in place it may make this diagnosis more difficult. The upstream should be switching from approx 1v-0v. If your downstream is mirroring your upstream, with the simulator unhooked, that would that will let you know that the oxygen sensor is good, but the converter is bad. Your o2 sensors produce a voltage, and it is my understanding that the simulator is just a voltage regulator. Under proper operation of the converters, your upstream will be switching 0v-1v, and your downstream will be around a constant 0.5v.
    If the upstream and downstream sensors are mirroring each other, that will set the p0420 code.
     
    ledhed likes this.
  20. Aug 12, 2022 at 6:05 PM
    #40
    ledhed

    ledhed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2018
    Member:
    #271565
    Messages:
    45
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tim
    Vehicle:
    2003 Supercharged V6
    Didn't know that until now, thanks your honor
     

Products Discussed in

To Top