1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Physics question...propulsion in a swimming pool

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussion' started by Veccster, Jul 2, 2012.

  1. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM
    #1
    Veccster

    Veccster [OP] bass turds

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Member:
    #8407
    Messages:
    2,085
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eric
    Pittsburgh - The City of Champions
    Vehicle:
    2009 DC V6 TRDsport
    5100's all around - fronts at 1.75", 265/70/17 Bridgestone Revo 2, HID headlights and fog lights, factory skid plate, ss exhaust tip, tube steps, Access roll-up tonneau cover, Redline hood struts, 6 D-rings, seat MagLite, LED dome, fumoto oil drain, DTRL, fog light anytime, Kenwood/Clarion speakers, Pop-N-Lock 5300, LED bed lights and a few other things...
    Question about jet propulsion...
    [​IMG]

    So over the weekend, we were floating around drunk in my swimming pool arguing over stupid stuff. Well, we starting talking about physics and it got ugly - even had my donut raft flipped over in rage!

    Let me paint the picture for you...

    You are sitting on a raft in the center of the pool - completely out of the water. You are holding a foam water blaster:
    [​IMG]
    You suck water in from your right side and shoot the water back into the pool on the same right side.
    Will it move your raft in the opposite direction (to the left)?

    Would it change the outcome if you:
    A) fired with the tip of the blaster IN or OUT of the water?
    B) fired with the tip of the blaster OUT of the water but hit the pool side with the stream of water?
    C) sucked water in from the left side and shot it out on the right side?
     
  2. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:36 PM
    #2
    Who Dat Popcorn

    Who Dat Popcorn Dafuq

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Member:
    #4992
    Messages:
    1,470
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ricky
    Richmond, VA
    Vehicle:
    Sold :/
    SOLD
  3. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:37 PM
    #3
    wildjerseyfirefighter

    wildjerseyfirefighter I sell fishing and fishing accessories

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Member:
    #11677
    Messages:
    7,966
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joe
    NJ
    Vehicle:
    05 Tacoma TRD Sport
    stock, for now
    not a whole lot to do there eh?
     
  4. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:39 PM
    #4
    Steves104x4

    Steves104x4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Member:
    #35468
    Messages:
    6,433
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Steve
    Buffalo NY
    Vehicle:
    2010 RC 2.7 4x4
    BUCKLE UP! It makes it harder for Aliens to pull you out of your Truck.
  5. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:43 PM
    #5
    Pugga

    Pugga Pasti-Dip Free 1983 - 2015... It was a good run

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Member:
    #39131
    Messages:
    29,095
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    '13 Ford F-150 SCREW
    F-150 Mod
    You're talking such minor amounts of energy that you wouldn't notice a difference no matter what you did. If you could do it in rapid succession, then you'd actually have some measurable propulsion.
     
  6. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:46 PM
    #6
    jgwheeler17

    jgwheeler17 I'm a zit. Get it?

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Member:
    #47112
    Messages:
    10,020
    Gender:
    Male
    NC
    Vehicle:
    07 Double Cab TRD Off-Road 4x4
    tint, dents, scratches, two blown speakers and trying to pay her off...
    ive discovered pugga is generally non bias and smart when it comes to smart things. therefor, i agree with that ^^

    but from a normal stupid person stance. . . i'd think the most effective way out of your options is the one where you suck it up on one side and blow it out the other underwater. . . . . that sounds wrong. . .anyway, most of that energy isn't going to transfer past your wrists, so it's pointless really. oh yeah, pugga already said that :eek:
     
  7. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM
    #7
    The Traveler

    The Traveler Formerly REBELTACO

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Member:
    #75806
    Messages:
    6,801
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    1980 Cherokee Chief
    I don't own a Taco anymore.
    LOL you sure you're not still drunk? :cheers:

    Shooting out of either side will propel you in the opposite direction. If you keep your arm still enough, you'll get more propulsion out of hitting the side of the pool, because equal and opposite reaction of water hitting concrete/brick is more concentrated and direct than the water in the gun just shooting and mixing with the rest of the water in the pool.

    BTW, doesn't matter what side you take the water from. That thing can only hold so many ounces of water and takes it in at such a slow rate that it won't make a difference.
     
  8. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM
    #8
    wileyC

    wileyC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Member:
    #65685
    Messages:
    2,938
    Gender:
    Male
    Centerville, OH
    Vehicle:
    2012 PreRunner Double Cab TRD Sport
    same basic principle as the waterjet used for propulsion in personal watercraft... newton laws of motion, more specifically bernoule's equation, ...thrust is generated in a direction opposite the direction of the exhaust stream..

    ..so, if the velocity and flow rate of the stream is the same for the two scenarios (discharged under water), and (discharged above water), ...the thrust should be the same... one thing to note, ...the pressure on the exhaust side, would technically be higher underwater than above (hydrostatic pressure vs. atmospheric pressure above the surface), this would affect the velocity/flow ..so you might argue a slight advantage if the discharge is above water...
     
  9. Jul 2, 2012 at 6:54 PM
    #9
    spares

    spares Canadian Bacon

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Member:
    #43710
    Messages:
    314
    Gender:
    Male
    New Brunswick, Canada
    Vehicle:
    06 DCSB TRD Sport
    I agree with the statement of minor amounts of energy, however to answer the question. You would stay in the same spot (sucking water in = 1 unit of negative energy, blowing it out = 1 unit of positive energy)
     
  10. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:01 PM
    #10
    Leggo

    Leggo slow is smooth, and smooth is fast.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Member:
    #47805
    Messages:
    2,031
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Steve
    Newton,Ma.
    Vehicle:
    10 TRD Sport AC 4x4 MGM
    Kenwood HU,Infinity Kappa speakers (x4), Infinity reference tweeters(x2),10" Kicker sub, Box by Subthump, Infinty Five channel amp,DVD anytime bypass, DTRL Mod, Xtang trifecta, Fogs anytime Mod, Bed Mat,Westin running boards, Console vault, Maglite mod, Weathertechs,Autopage remote starter, Power tailgate lock, HID Bi Zenon, Hella Supertones,Rain guards,Rear leaf TSB,Steering shaft TSB, Fisher Homesteader plow, 886 reverse lights mod, Redline Hood struts, Hankook Dynapro ATM LT265/70R17, power sliding rear window, Auto dimming/on anytime Bed lights, Blue Sea fuse panel & 100amp Breaker, de- badged,Rear headrest's removed, imMrYo mirror relocation,Homeroshi grill
    This is stupid, so I 'll jump right in. If you suck in slowly and expel under rapid or high pressure you will achieve propulsion opposite the intake side. The energy you add to the equation with "arm strength" is the reason.
     
  11. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:15 PM
    #11
    stewartx

    stewartx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Member:
    #70271
    Messages:
    1,815
    Gender:
    Male
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2012 Silver DC SB TRD Off-Road
    Winch, front hitch, step bars, bed extender, bed step, gull-wing toolbox, tailgate lock, security system, cb radio, etc.
    Not necessarily true, spares. If you sucked water in at a fixed rate and then expelled it with much greater force, you would travel in a direction opposite of that greater force. This crudely describes the principle behind several propulsion systems (jet engines, boat propellers, etc). Of course, his foam water blaster could not generate enough force to significantly propel anything as large as a person (at least not without a whole lot of very fast pumping).
     
  12. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:19 PM
    #12
    spares

    spares Canadian Bacon

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Member:
    #43710
    Messages:
    314
    Gender:
    Male
    New Brunswick, Canada
    Vehicle:
    06 DCSB TRD Sport
    :eek: For some reason I overlooked the whole adding energy from the person... I will blame it on Canada Day and the equal and opposite reaction that comes with the celebrations
     
  13. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:21 PM
    #13
    MXscott14

    MXscott14 Bartle Do Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Member:
    #41541
    Messages:
    373
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Keith Stone
    In Front Of You
    Vehicle:
    tacoma 6inch procomp trail grapplers35's
    Black Headlight, Foglight always on,
    air has density, therefor the moving water in the air, will cause you to move slightly.
     
  14. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:27 PM
    #14
    bjmoose

    bjmoose Bullwinkle J. Moose

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Member:
    #42529
    Messages:
    5,675
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Steve
    San Jose CA
    Vehicle:
    '11 Std Cab 4x4 5sp
    OME suspension, ARB Air Locker, Yaesu FT 8900 Ham Radio
    You don't tell us how fast you squirt it out.

    It's a physics problem - so let's look at the relevant physics laws.

    A body at rest will tend to remain at rest, unless acted upon by a Force.

    Force = Mass * Acceleration

    In any closed system, momentum is conserved.

    Momentum = mass * velocity.

    Total Momentum at time 0: zero. (velocity of raft, water, all zero)

    At time 1 - the water is "slurped."
    Total Momentum at time 1: still zero. (momentum is conserved!)

    0 = mass(raft) * velocity(raft towards edge of pool) - mass(slurped water) * velocity(slurped water)
    OR
    velocity1(raft) = (mass(slurped water)/mass(raft)) * velocity(slurped water)
    HOWEVER - since the "slurped" water is stationary at the time it is slurped (the speed of the plunger is irrelevant!) V1 (raft towards the edge of the pool) remains zero.

    At time 2 - the water is "squirted."

    Total Momentum at time 2: still zero. (momentum is conserved.)

    0 = mass(raft) * velocity(raft) - mass(squirted water) * velocity(squirted water)
    OR:
    velocity(raft) = (mass(squirted water)/mass(raft)) * velocity(squirted water)

    However, at this time, the raft velocity is now greater than zero, away from the edge of the pool.

    What happens to the water after it leaves the squirter is irrelevant. (It doesn't need the edge of the pool to "push against;" that's a layman's fallacy.)

    If the squirter is off-center from the raft when squirted, the raft will have be less linear velocity and more angular velocity. But that's a problem for another day.
     
  15. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:31 PM
    #15
    bjmoose

    bjmoose Bullwinkle J. Moose

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Member:
    #42529
    Messages:
    5,675
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Steve
    San Jose CA
    Vehicle:
    '11 Std Cab 4x4 5sp
    OME suspension, ARB Air Locker, Yaesu FT 8900 Ham Radio
    One more thing to think about - when you load a gun, there's no recoil from the act of picking up and loading. Duh right?

    But why is that?

    It's because the initial velocity of the bullet when you pick it up off the table is zero.
     
  16. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:47 PM
    #16
    wileyC

    wileyC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Member:
    #65685
    Messages:
    2,938
    Gender:
    Male
    Centerville, OH
    Vehicle:
    2012 PreRunner Double Cab TRD Sport
    when you pick up the gun you exert a force on it, ...and it exerts the same force on you (newton's 3rd law)..

    ..the "recoil" felt from firing the gun is basically the same thing, ...but the impulsive force resulting from accelerating the projectile and the burning powder exiting the barrel is much higher, albeit shorter in duration...
     
  17. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:49 PM
    #17
    BamaToy1997

    BamaToy1997 ASE Master Tech Vendor

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Member:
    #71846
    Messages:
    9,488
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bill
    Navarre, FL
    Vehicle:
    1997 Tacoma 4X4 AKA "Blue Beast"
    Multi-point tow hooks, new bored 2.7L engine, custom paint. 3 inch adjustable Fabtech front coils, 2.5 inch rear AAL. Front Aussie locker. LED bed lights. Full LED conversion interior and exterior. Relentless Fabrication front and rear bumpers. 4X4innovation sliders. BAMF bed rack. CVT rooftop tent.
    I must disagree with you there. It would be the opposite. If the squirter were discharged above the water, there would be LESS advantage, due to resistance. Picture this, if you push your arms in front of you, and there is only air, the resistance is effectively zero. Do this under water, and you move in the opposite direction (this is how we can swim) If there were no resistance, we couldn't move, because we have nothing to press against.

    The density of air is minimal compared to the density of water. This again means that the resistance is greater when the squirter would be discharged under water. The reason that there is increased movement of the raft this way is because the raft is floating on TOP of the water. The resistance to movement would only be that of the "drag" of the raft moving across the water.
     
  18. Jul 2, 2012 at 7:53 PM
    #18
    bjmoose

    bjmoose Bullwinkle J. Moose

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Member:
    #42529
    Messages:
    5,675
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Steve
    San Jose CA
    Vehicle:
    '11 Std Cab 4x4 5sp
    OME suspension, ARB Air Locker, Yaesu FT 8900 Ham Radio
    I think we're saying the same thing here. Since it's initial momentum is zero, and your initial momentum is zero - the momentum of both after you pick it up remains zero.

    Right. But to solve the problem, we need not concern ourselves with the "Force" involved at all. We can calculate the final velocity of either the bullet or the shooter experiencing the recoil (assuming he's wearing roller skates) by knowing the ratio of their masses and the final velocity of one or the other.
     
  19. Jul 2, 2012 at 8:02 PM
    #19
    wileyC

    wileyC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Member:
    #65685
    Messages:
    2,938
    Gender:
    Male
    Centerville, OH
    Vehicle:
    2012 PreRunner Double Cab TRD Sport
    from a fluid dynamics perspective, ...i.e. control volume w/ mass flows in/out, ..the velocity and flowrate, all other things the same, is all that matters... ever see that new jet suit, that sucks up water from the surface and pumps it up to a jetpack on the guys back thrusting him upward? could extenuating things alter the velocity and flowrate - sure, ...if for instance the difference in the pressure on the exhaust side (which is why boat engines can produce more power by dumping their exhaust above water rather than below, i.e. "through-hull exhaust)...
     
  20. Jul 2, 2012 at 8:09 PM
    #20
    wileyC

    wileyC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Member:
    #65685
    Messages:
    2,938
    Gender:
    Male
    Centerville, OH
    Vehicle:
    2012 PreRunner Double Cab TRD Sport
    yes, i see what you are saying, ...newton's laws serve as an abstract for these behaviors (except for parasitic losses, heat exchange, etc..), ...but you'll find that fluid dynamics, and, more broadly, thermodynamics give more insight into what's going on and why... actually the laws of thermodynamics, especially the 1st law, expressed in long form for control volumes, quite perfectly envelops all that goes on in the physical world...
     
To Top