Remote reservoirs necessary on Coil Carrier with Bypass shock LT setup?

Hey all,

For a front long travel setup with separate bypass shocks, where the coilover is mainly just a coil spring carrier, is having a remote reservoir on the coil carrier kinda pointless?

Im debating between just a standard 2.5 emulsion coil carrier, and the 2.5 DSC adjustable remote res. But Im wondering if the remote res would be a waste?

 

Anyone?

 

Try posting up in this sub forum

https://www.tacomaworld.com/forums/long-travel-suspension.113/

Or asking in this thread

https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads/long-travel-bs-thread.109317/

 

Ahhh thanks! missed thoses

 

The coilover is a very important part of the coilover/bypass setup. It must be valved appropriately and should be a remote reservoir 2.5 shock minimum.

Happy to help if you have any other questions!