1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Semiconductor shortage is showing long term consequences.

Discussion in 'General Automotive' started by deanosaurus, Mar 15, 2021.

  1. Mar 15, 2021 at 10:45 AM
    #1
    deanosaurus

    deanosaurus [OP] Caveman

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2018
    Member:
    #260241
    Messages:
    2,141
    Northeast Region
    Vehicle:
    09 TRD OR AC
    Hey folks,

    I saw this in the news today: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-gm-semiconductors-idUSKBN2B71P5

    tl;dr Reuters reports that GM is building some trucks without a fuel management module because they can't get the chips for them. These trucks are supposed to get one less (-1) MPG for the life of the vehicle, compared to an identical truck WITH the FMM installed.

    Pure, cynical speculation on my part says that 1) it's probably way more than 1 MPG outside of the EPA test routine, and 2) if these trucks even can get a FMM added later, want to bet that it's gonna be a real pain? I would take a bare guess and say it's gonna require a special kit and wiring harness stuff, because why wouldn't it? Ha!
     
    tacotoe and ecoterragaia like this.
  2. Mar 16, 2021 at 5:39 AM
    #2
    ecoterragaia

    ecoterragaia Everyone lives downstream.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Member:
    #49786
    Messages:
    1,840
    Gender:
    Male
    Central Virginia
    Vehicle:
    2006 RC 4X4 5 speed & 2021 4Runner SR5
    I'll be cynical too and ask why they didn't get rid of the OnStar module, or maybe the unnecessary electronic nannies?

    Seriously though, I am guessing the lack of active fuel management is equivalent to having a CEL on and the ECM going into "open loop". It would operate on a preprogrammed A/F ratio rather than having inputs from the MAF and O2 sensors. Slightly less efficient, but safer for the engine since it will be running a little rich all the time. Might actually increase longevity of the engine overall.

    Edit:. Oh wait, is this the system that deactivates cylinders? If so, nevermind what I said.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2021
    tacotoe likes this.
  3. Mar 16, 2021 at 5:47 AM
    #3
    tacotoe

    tacotoe Pastry Chef

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Member:
    #3593
    Messages:
    5,915
    Nebraska
    Vehicle:
    `17 AC Sport MT
    ARE Topper, Icon aal, OEM Audio+
    I'm going to be cynical as well and say I'd bet that 5.3 V8 still gets better or as good a MPG as my Tacoma, even without active fuel management.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top