1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Spacer vs coilover adjustable strut lift. Front end geometry difference?

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas (1995-2004)' started by bodhi armor, May 13, 2015.

  1. May 13, 2015 at 4:34 PM
    #1
    bodhi armor

    bodhi armor [OP] 02’ Dbl Cab- "The Luck Dragon"

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2015
    Member:
    #153669
    Messages:
    530
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joshua
    East TX
    Vehicle:
    2002 4x4 Dbl Cab Jade Green
    So, I have read a lot of threads and comments saying to avoid (above strut mounted) strut spacers because they change the suspension geometry which puts the steering and suspension components under too much stress.
    With this type of lift the ratio of lift compared to the thickness of the spacer is 2 to1.
    meaning, if the spacer measures 1" thick it will produce 2" of lift.

    While the spacer style lift is frowned upon because of potential damage, the coilover adjustable strut (IE; Bilstein 5100 w/ Eibach extended springs) lift is highly recommended and very commonly used.

    I understand the benefits and drawbacks of both types of lifts as it pertains to offroad capability.
    That's not my question.

    The way I understand it (if I'm wrong someone please correct me), The "Bilstein / Eibach strut assembly is longer than the stock strut assembly. so when it is installed the increased length of the strut assembly is what provides lift.
    Where as the spacer simply increases the length of the stock strut assembly which provides the lift.

    My question is, How is one potentially less damaging than the other?

    They both work off of the same principal, Increase length of strut assembly to produce lift.

    How does one change the front end "geometry" too drastically and the other doesn't.

    Again, I'm not asking about the benefits of one compared to another as far a ride quality, or off road capability.
    I simply want to know how the geometry changes are different for the two lift styles that use essentially the same method to provide lift.
     
  2. May 13, 2015 at 8:56 PM
    #2
    devinzz1

    devinzz1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Member:
    #132892
    Messages:
    7,010
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    devin
    lewisporte Newfoundland
    Vehicle:
    2023 aclb trd or mt
    icon stage 10 kit, toytec 1" bl, 35" general x3s, 17x9.5 procomp wheels, locker anytime mod, s&b intake, blackhawk 2.1 tune,
    ^^^ what he said. Strut spacers especially the 3" lift ones will over extend ball joints when when the tire drops
     
  3. Feb 12, 2017 at 10:34 AM
    #3
    Jeddo

    Jeddo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Member:
    #203818
    Messages:
    23
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tacoma off road access cab
    Bed mat, step, and lights, huskie mud flaps, Polk components, Alpine amp, 3 layer sound proofing, B&I blackwood dash kit, fluid film, led cabin and footwell lights, tail letters, window tint, IGGEE seat covers. More to come.
    Would like to revive this thread as the question was posed very well and did not get much response. I just purchased front B 5100 and was planning to lift 1-1 1/2' until I measured and found that even 2 1/2" won't get my truck level. Was planning to use stock springs, but now seeing I need more, I am concerned about geometry and spring rate with this set up. Any insight and suggestions welcome.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top