Still think TITNC3: Return of the Iceberg was peak

I'm trying to find something for a long term that I like, just not exactly sure yet.

 

I’m going back into NNOX. Made me a lot on its approval spike. Not EV, but potential could be terrific. Spiked on approval, then sold off. Now I’m ready to get back on board.

Also, anyone know anything about ASTS ? My nephew said it’s the future of internet. He’s 15 and wants 100 shares as an early high school graduation gift

 

Shit will still go down somehow..

 

I'll look into them. I'm intrigued since they're developing a new system that is in my career field. Haven't looked into them before.

Although they did just say a hand Xray was done with this machine at a KVP at 40 and a MaS of 1.5, when a "normal xray is done at KVP50-60 and MaS at 3-5"..

Which isn't accurate. A typical hand exam is done at KVp 50-60 and a MaS at just .05-1.

So the point they were trying to make is that their machine cuts down on Radiation to the patient (MAs), which is inaccurate.

 

Just sold off 3/4 of my stake in AMC for $19.91

Was a long period of time I never thought I'd see any gains since I bought in at $18...lol.

Bought high and sold higher...I may be doing this wrong...

Needed to free up some cash for more GME.

 

Yea let me know what you think. My read is it would be a much cheaper solution, and they’d be doing same business model as those davinci surgical robots, so a continuous revenue stream as opposed to just selling units.

 

What about the AMC 100k floor?

 

I bought 60 shares for fun at 13.01 the other day, nice to see the rise but it’s a longer term hold for me.

 

Will do.

They're giving a 3D image of a bone (Like an MRI or CT machine would do) by taking multiple images of a patient. Which is using radiation to the patient as where an MRI machine would be safer to a patient in that perspective by using a Magnetic field. However, MRI machines are very expensive, and expensive to maintain. Im sure they're machine probably isn't close to that price to maintain and install.. however that's just showing mostly bone and not as extensive imaging as an MRI would do. But if you could get some images for cheaper than a CT or MRI would cost, they'd buy it. Would be interested in seeing more of their main selling pitch for it.

 

i mean he's probably right. star link is a thing now and its its surprisingly good for internet being beamed from space

 

The volume candles relative to price movement on this chart give me a tingly feeling in the bone zone.

 

Decent spot to get in right now

 

I got a solicitation from T-Mobile for 5G internet. $60 a month for ~100Mbit/s, router included. Competition is going to be stiff for space based internet.

 

I don't think you're StarLink's target demographic. They're going to want to go after Hughesnet and other existing shitty satellite companies first. Places like Rural Montana or Kansas or whatnot where there's no existing competition.

 

Violently agreeing. The plump customers have been plucked. How many space based companies (Direct TV, etc) are competing for how much money in/from WV, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Solomon Islands?

Edit: I looked at Starlink a while back. Off the top of my head the HW was $499.00. The service price wasn’t bad, I forget the price. Some where I read that Starlink loses $2500 on the deal (the HW cost them $3000). I stoped there and no longer consider its IPO an investment possibility.

 

And that's just based on the published short interest data. They've almost certainly lost multiples of that

 

I have been waiting for this for years, my eyes thank you!