Still think TITNC3: Return of the Iceberg was peak

One of those articles that came out last night basically accused reddit of colluding to bring them down

Reddit was like: dafuq, we've never even heard of this shitty fly by night hedge fund

 

yeah MarketWatch were the folks that published about the stock going to on march 10 20 minutes before it happened.

I obviously don't read marketwatch anymore since March. It's actually sad, the majority of "business news" is paid for....

 

Yeah, It betted against is why its out. Market watch didn't say it that way lol. Along with every other news media that want to persuade your thoughts. Fair and Unbiased of course.

 

Yeah If that happened I could double

 

So not only does 002 go into effect tomorrow, but there are over 75k FTDs due tomorrow (compared to 17.8k due today). According to dentisttft's DD, over 70k is "a large number" of FTDs in regards to GME price movement. And then there's T+21 on Thursday.

Do I buy another weekly or not......

 

I can’t think of any reason not to

 

I don't want to put more money in RH is my dilemma.

Fidelity only lets you trade options with "settled" funds. I don't want to throw like $1k in there and way days and miss the boat..

hmmmmmmm

 

Quite the movement while I was at lunch, up to 2.19, and now diving again. A ton of volume (for GTii at least) on that run up though, and now dead

 

Well..an ambitious investor will short 100K shares now and buy them back at $1.50 on the day and make $30K

 

It sure is easy once you have the money to do it

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o5umc0/babe_go_short_it_who_is_stopping_you/

Why I don't like Seeking Alpha either. They printed the early article on march 10. yet another biased "news" source smh

 

I don't miss it.

 

That’s not a “seeking alpha” stance. Just one of the contributors. The author is a group of people called “bears of Wall Street”

Seeking alpha often has different contributors making opposing cases for the same stock.

 

i don't like seeking alpha because they introduced a paywall....

 

Well that’s a different argument.

But they have hosted articles saying the Stonk is still undervalued. Also one about GME options being a good opportunity. Im just saying they have articles written by independent entities, they don’t just act like some of the other sources that try to push a narrative

 

Then I still don't like them for that structure. Why not fact check at the very least before publishing a "contributor"

I hope that "bears of Wall street" group shorts GME. that would be fun to watch lol

 

seeking alpha was essentially a forum...it had a whole gamut of contributors ranging from value to REITs to growth to option plays.
i thought it was pretty informative and read it often.
as with all 'analysts', take it with a grain of salt.
some guys on there actually had some really good analyses. some of it was total fluff.
i'm pretty bummed on the paywall...but i don't want to pay so there's that...

 

Their bio states shorting is their main strategy, and you can’t fact check opinion pieces. You allow people to read opinions from both sides, compare that to the “facts” they think they know, and decide which argument makes the most sense.