1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Stock N/A 3.4 Powerband for Regear

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas (1995-2004)' started by Diagram14, Jul 5, 2015.

  1. Jul 5, 2015 at 11:38 AM
    #1
    Diagram14

    Diagram14 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Member:
    #115566
    Messages:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    04 DC Tacoma TRD
    I am on the tail end of doing my research for differential regearing, having lost too much torque after a lift and tires. My 04 DC TRD auto Tacoma is lifted ~3" and wearing Cooper Discover ST/Maxx 255/85R16s. Cooper has the true tire diameter listed at 32.8".

    Maybe my search terminology is terrible but I have googled my brains out for the stock powerband for the 3.4 with zero success. I am hoping to use the numbers to help me decide between the 4.56:1 and the 4.88:1 gears. The only thing I have found is a generic statement about the powerband being narrow but I want to pick the gear ratio that lands an average cruising speed in that RPM window. If anyone has that information in any form I would appreciate the share.

    I used the gearing-RPM calculator at csgnetwork.com that includes a final-drive input so I could compare RPMs in 3rd and OD between the gearing options. I also verified the accuracy to my current setup by noting GPS speed and RPM and inputting those values to confirm. I found the calculator to be around 20 RPMs different from what I could eyeball from the in-dash tachometer. See those numbers in the attachment.

    Gears.jpg

    I know there are a lot of opinions out there on which gear set to choose and each has their own merits. I hope to let the numbers decide this debate for me. Just like the old saying goes, "Happy motor happy life."
     
  2. Jul 5, 2015 at 3:00 PM
    #2
    xcmtb83

    xcmtb83 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Member:
    #64315
    Messages:
    1,038
    Gender:
    Male
    Iowa
    4.88 or 5.29 with any elevation above 2,500ft, LT tires and an automatic trans. The automatics cruise at a lower RPM than a manual trans does so I wouldn't even bother with 4.56. These trucks are gutless to begin with and an auto is even worse.
     
  3. Jul 5, 2015 at 3:13 PM
    #3
    Crunkbananas

    Crunkbananas Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2015
    Member:
    #157928
    Messages:
    20
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chase
    Portland, OR
    Vehicle:
    1999 Tacoma TRD, 2022 TRDOR DCLB
    Softopper!
    Have you tried using this gear calculator?

    Might help you out a little.
     
  4. Jul 5, 2015 at 5:19 PM
    #4
    Diagram14

    Diagram14 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Member:
    #115566
    Messages:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    04 DC Tacoma TRD
    Crunkbananas - Thanks, I have used that calculator. And while it has a lot of useful information I am really only after RPMs at average cruizing speed. I guess my goal is to select the highest gear ratio possible while not exceeding the top end of the motor's "powerband." What I am looking for is some sort of documentation of the efficiency vs RPM of the 3.4.

    There are a few hills I drive regularly that I cannot hold 50 MPH in 3rd. I also tow a drift boat occasionally which was tough with factory tires and is now a joke with the 33s.
     
  5. Jul 6, 2015 at 8:11 AM
    #5
    Wulf

    Wulf no brain just damage

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Member:
    #147523
    Messages:
    61,527
    Gender:
    Female
    Vehicle:
    rock raisin
    It sounds like you are looking for dyno charts. I think there are a few out there in the pre/post deckplate mod threads.
     
  6. Jul 6, 2015 at 3:50 PM
    #6
    Diagram14

    Diagram14 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Member:
    #115566
    Messages:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    04 DC Tacoma TRD
    I have looked at several of those. They are marginally helpful but I havent been able to find a "before" dyno that was absolutely stock.

    Someone shared the following dyno plot with me that compares the 5VZ to the 3VZ
    163949d1436140901-stock-n-3-4-powerband-_9879b6c0ced758d946c2edb8907b39f2b7eb7a1f.jpg

    Its hard to tell much on this curve because of its size and lack of graduation. What I am not able to determine is in what RPM window is the 3.4 happiest while cruising. Looking at the torque curve there is a second up-trend starting around 2500 RPMs. Obviously the motor has mechanical advantage from there up to 3500ish RPM but does that mean the motor is comfortable holding those RPMs for extended periods of time? Or does the 3.4 prefer that flat spot in the torque curve ~1800-2500 RPMs? This is what I am trying to determine.
     
  7. Jul 6, 2015 at 5:28 PM
    #7
    drr

    drr Primary Prognosticator

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Member:
    #114681
    Messages:
    2,715
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dan
    Seattle-ish
    Vehicle:
    02 4WD Tacoma
    I have no data to offer you, only my experience with the 3.4L with auto trans and 4.56 gears. The regear definitely helped with the underpowered-ness when running 255/85 tires, although it still wants to hunt for the right gear on any kind of hill while cruising on the highway.

    If you look at your numbers above, the difference in RPM between 4.56 and 4.88 ranges from 115 RPM to 199 RPM in OD, which is negligible at average cruising speed (~65 mph) as far as available power goes. When you drop it into 3rd to climb a hill at that speed, you're already putting the motor into the powerband at 3000+ RPM regardless of the gearing. If you're worried about wear on the engine due to the differences between the two gear ratios, I think you'd have to put a million miles on the truck before that even became a factor.

    All that being said, I kinda wish I'd gone with 4.88s, because I don't need the top speed, and I'd rather have the usable low end power.
     
  8. Jul 7, 2015 at 5:42 AM
    #8
    frizzman

    frizzman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2013
    Member:
    #113212
    Messages:
    5,351
    Gender:
    Male
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Vehicle:
    04 XCab 4x4 TRD/OR
    OME 2.5,Tundra 17s,Falken Wildpeak AT3W hitch w/ 7-pin, ARE cap, JVC HU w/BT, HID/LED lights
    Are you taking into account the larger tires in your chart? It seems that first one is based on stock ~31" tires. re-figuring for the change would put your RPMs lower, no?

    and at least on mine with stock setup my RPMs are a little higher than the chart mentions (70mph is around 2150, 80mph is around 2500rpm)
     
  9. Jul 7, 2015 at 5:47 AM
    #9
    frizzman

    frizzman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2013
    Member:
    #113212
    Messages:
    5,351
    Gender:
    Male
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Vehicle:
    04 XCab 4x4 TRD/OR
    OME 2.5,Tundra 17s,Falken Wildpeak AT3W hitch w/ 7-pin, ARE cap, JVC HU w/BT, HID/LED lights
    I might be looking at the question wrong so apologies if I didn't get it. However from my driving it seems happiest around the 2100-2500 range. I can hit the throttle a little more without dropping a gear on the highway.

    There's probably a formula that would compensate for the weight of the truck vs the torque number but I think everyone's setup would be different in the end :notsure:
     
  10. Jul 7, 2015 at 5:55 AM
    #10
    manitouyota

    manitouyota Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2015
    Member:
    #156414
    Messages:
    207
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Austen
    Manitou Springs
    Vehicle:
    2001 TACO DC 4x4
    I can vouch for that!
     
  11. Jul 7, 2015 at 10:15 AM
    #11
    Wulf

    Wulf no brain just damage

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Member:
    #147523
    Messages:
    61,527
    Gender:
    Female
    Vehicle:
    rock raisin
    FWIW it seems like people are always wishing they had gone with deeper gears but I rarely see anything that they wish they hadn't gone with the deeper gears :)
     
  12. Jul 7, 2015 at 12:22 PM
    #12
    Diagram14

    Diagram14 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Member:
    #115566
    Messages:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    04 DC Tacoma TRD
    Yeah, I want to go with the highest ratio possible while keeping the motor happy at a cruising RPM of it's liking. Speed limit where I live is 70 with flow of traffic generally around 75-80.

    I know driving slower is the compromise the higher you go in gearing but I feel that not being able to maintain with traffic is a safety issue.

    I would love to be able to go 4.88s but want be sure I can hold the RPMs in my original post for 70-80 MPH for extended periods without melting the motor.
     
  13. Jul 7, 2015 at 12:35 PM
    #13
    frizzman

    frizzman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2013
    Member:
    #113212
    Messages:
    5,351
    Gender:
    Male
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Vehicle:
    04 XCab 4x4 TRD/OR
    OME 2.5,Tundra 17s,Falken Wildpeak AT3W hitch w/ 7-pin, ARE cap, JVC HU w/BT, HID/LED lights
    you can run the motor all day at 3k just don't expect to get above 13mpg :)
     
  14. Jul 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM
    #14
    Diagram14

    Diagram14 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Member:
    #115566
    Messages:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    04 DC Tacoma TRD
    13 MPG at 3000 RPM doesnt sound like the motor likes it very much.
     
  15. Jul 9, 2015 at 3:24 PM
    #15
    DSMJRV

    DSMJRV Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2013
    Member:
    #115066
    Messages:
    354
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    justin
    Corona, CA
    the motor or you? lol

    Im jelly of you automatics 80mph at < 2500rpm? On stock tires and stock gears im running 2900rpm at 80mph, and its not very efficient there for cruising maybe 15mpg... My cousins auto 4runner is right around 2400 at 80 and its quite a bit more efficient getting about 21mpg but it also feels gutless and wants to downshift a lot on hills.

    So yeah if 2400 is weak but efficient, and 2900 is strong but wasteful... pick something in between?
     
  16. Jul 9, 2015 at 3:59 PM
    #16
    Digiratus

    Digiratus Adventurer

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Member:
    #34006
    Messages:
    23,769
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Roaming the PNW
    Vehicle:
    The RedHead
    2002 XtraCab TRD 4x4 SCv6 AutoTrans With Lots of Mods ADS COs w/Compression Adjusters Camburg Uniball UCAs Whiteline Lower Control Arm Bushings Kartek 7" Limit Straps Plastics Guy Front Bumpstops Total Chaos Sprindle Gussets Custom Alcan Springs +800 lbs +3" ADS 10" Stroke Triple Bypass w/Resi Rear Shocks Custom Rear Shock Relocate All-Pro U-bolt Flip w/Timbren Bumpstops 4.88 Nitro Gears ARB Front Locker ARB Twin Compressor Black 17x8 Konig Countersteer Type X 285/70r17 Falken A/T3w Gunmetal 16x8 SCS Ray10s 255/85r16 Maxxis Bighorns Limited Edition (Relentless) Elite Front Bumper Smittybilt X2O 10K Winch Diode Dynamics SS3 Sport Selective Yellow Fog Lights in the Bumper Diode Dynamics SS3 Pro 4,000 Kelvin SAE Driving Lights with Clear Lenses on the Bumper Morimoto D2S Projectors XB35 Ballasts + 4300K Bulbs Badland Sliders FrankenFab Tire Carrier Swingout bumper w/kitchen BudBuilt Front & Bellypan Skids BAMF Rear Diff Skid Dometic CFX 55im Fridge/Freezer Alpha II Hardshell RTT Badland Custom Bed Rack Denso 210-0461 105 amp alternator Dual Northstar 24F AGM batteries BlueSea 7622 ML-ACR Battery controller Peak DBI Dual Battery Voltage Monitor Haltech IC-7 Display with Mako Dash Insert Haltech Elite 2500 Standalone ECU Magnuson MP62 Supercharger w/URD 2.2" Pulley Denso 650cc Fuel Injectors Aeromotive Stealth 340 Fuel Pump TransGo A340F Reprogramming Shift Kit Doug Thorley Headers 2.5" Magnaflow Hi-Flow CAT Magnaflow 18" Muffler w/Vibrant Resonator 13WL Brake Calipers Braided Steel Brake Lines Kenwood TM-71A Dual Band Ham Radio Larson 70CM/2M Antenna Midland MTX275 GMRS Radio w/Roof Mount Antenna Uniden 520xl CB radio 3' Firestik Adjustable tip antenna Pioneer DEH-P9400BH HU Alpine Amps & Type R components (F) and coaxials (R) Wet Okole Seat Covers Weathertech Digital Liners Deck Plate Mod 1" Diff Drop Carrier Bearing Drop
    The weight of your rig should play a roll in your decision. A stock rig weighing in at ~4,000 lbs is a lot different from one with bumpers, skids and sliders weighing in at +5000 lbs.

    FWIW, I am over 5K with 33s and regearing to 4.88s was by far the best mod I have done. On the 33s at 70 mph (gps) I am at 2500 rpms (corrected).
     
    xcmtb83 likes this.
  17. Jul 10, 2015 at 9:23 AM
    #17
    xcmtb83

    xcmtb83 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Member:
    #64315
    Messages:
    1,038
    Gender:
    Male
    Iowa
    Digiratus - That must be an auto? I am still at a higher RPM at 70mph with 33" tires and 4.30 gears and a manual trans and my speedo is dead nuts on with the GPS. Moral of the story is, to the OP I wouldn't be afraid of 4.88. Digiratus is a perfect example, don't be afraid of a few extra RPMs as he is still slightly lower than a factory manual trans set-up.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top