1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Tacoma vs Tundra

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas' started by bramllr, Sep 13, 2011.

  1. bramllr

    bramllr [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Member:
    #63404
    Messages:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Hey guys I am new here and I am sure this has been discussed before and if it has just send me the link to the thread.

    I have been looking at the 2006 Tundras and was dead set on getting one until I started reading about the 2nd gen Tacoma. I realize there isnt much room difference and that was the main reason for getting the Tundra. I will have a baby boy here around Christmas so the ease of fitting a car seat in the back seat if preferred. The length of the bed isnt a big deal to me as I will probably have a trailer to haul whatever it may be that will not fit in the bed. I guess my question is, which do you guys think is more mechanically reliable? I know this is a Tacoma forum and you will probably lean more towards the Tacoma but I have read on the Tundra forum and have heard of very few complaints about mechanical issues. I have driven a Tacoma before and liked it and also I love the look of the Tacoma over the Tundra. Another question. How many miles do you think one can get out of a Tacoma mainly using it for a daily driver and some off roading on a deer lease? Any and all input is appreciated.
     
  2. chadderkdawg

    chadderkdawg Don't ask questions you don't want the answer to..

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Member:
    #55763
    Messages:
    8,182
    Gender:
    Male
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Vehicle:
    09 FX4 F150
    If you are wanting to haul the kid, get a double cab, if you are wanting to haul stuff, get a long box. Double cab, long box is the way to go for you. A better value than a first gen Tundra, basically the same truck, but more reliable. I've got 135k on my 2006, its a daily driver and my only cost is fuel. I've had no mechanical repairs since I've owned it (knock on wood). The Tundra would have more power and a little more head room, but if you aren't too concerned with those things I would just go with the Taco. Hope that helps!
     
  3. kauaibuilt

    kauaibuilt U no kea but AINOFEA!

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Member:
    #43836
    Messages:
    544
    Gender:
    Male
    LA/SGV
    Vehicle:
    2011 DCSB
    Check out my sig...
    I got an 11mo old... We used a base with our rear facing seat and it was tight to put him in the middle of the rear seat - it was actually worse when we tried to fit the seat without the base. Now he's in a convertible seat (the ones that face rearward until they're old/heavy enough to face front) and rides behind the driver seat. Again, tight fit with it facing rearward.

    Since we have a dog I ended up getting a bestop so she could ride in back. now that hes on one side I sold the bestop.

    If carrying 1 or 2 people in the rear it'll be tight. If carrying enough stuff for a vacation it'll be tight unless you have a roof rack or bed cover or cap.

    Taco served our purposes - barely - but better then the FJ (yeah we considered one of those) would have consider the reach into the rear. I can say that I miss my Access Cab F150 (bought new and traded in 2009) and have wished for it back because of the space in the back (too bad parking in the city sucks with a FS truck).

    Thats my $0.02.
     
  4. 98tacoma27

    98tacoma27 :POOPCORN: Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Member:
    #11714
    Messages:
    48,253
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ben
    Beech Creek
    Vehicle:
    05 Tundra SR5, 88 SR5 PU, 98 TRD OR (CRUSHED)
    5100's all on fours
    I have an 05 Tundra AC. The only issue I have had with it is a TPMS sensor failing. From a reliability stand point, I would consider them equals.

    You will probably pay less for the Tundra than the Tacoma, but that's going to boil down to what options you are looking for. Believe it or not, gas mileage is fairly equal too, even though the Tundra has the 4.7l. The only thing the Tundra has against it (IMHO) is the timing belt and the fact that it is an interference motor (4.7l). The 4.0l has a chain.

    FWIW, the First gen Tundras are almost the same size as Second Gen Tacomas. It boils down to an inch or two here and there dimensionally. All in all, they are both solid trucks.
     
  5. Fightnfire

    Fightnfire Recklessly tired

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Member:
    #58178
    Messages:
    5,049
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Luke
    Marysville, WA
    Vehicle:
    09 Access Cab V6 4X4
    Softopper, Bilstein 5100's @ 1.75 in the front, TSB Rear, 17x8.5 Lvl 8 Guardians, 265/70-17 Goodyear Wrangler Duratracs, Scooped, Anytime fog mod, Osram Nightbreakers, LED Interior lights, Debadged, Painted valance, Removed rear head rests, De-flapped, Hidden Hitch installed, Weather Techs, Flyzeye'd A/W/A, Cover Kings,... oh and the hot wife mod.
    I haul two kids in an access cab, we fit fine. A double cab would be nicer, obviously, but that was also about 4-5k more in price for a used certified. I looked everywhere and the double cabs, 09+ under 30k miles were 28+ I found my access cab for 23,500.

    My two are 3 and 10 mos. The 3 year old faces forward behind me and the 10mos old faces backward behind my wife. The little guy can face forward in a year, then we will swap their seating position and we'll get even more room.

    I wouldn't put any kids in the back of anything older than 09. The safety features added in 09+ get the Tacoma a 4-5 star rating depending on the test ...

    All Tacoma btw, no idea on the Tundra, never been in a fist gen.
     
  6. MAXTacoma

    MAXTacoma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Member:
    #917
    Messages:
    4,341
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    Lexus GS 350
    My Dad has an 04 Tundra Dbl Cab 4.7 4x4 120k. Great truck but on the 4.7 you need to replace the timing belt (4.0 Tacomas dont), Tundra seem to have a common problem with warped from disks (80k on Tacoma and not a problem), Dads Tundra seems to need O2 Sensors and are expensive, and Dads Tundra seems to have developed an exhaust/intake leak. Now for the Tacomas issues as all cars have them. The 4.0 seems to be pretty well built, never heard on anyone have any issues with the motor or the 5 speed auto. The 6 speed people seem tohave some issue with the throw out bearing. The Suspension on the trucks from the factory is weak, so people bottom out and replace others dont have any problems at all. I had to replace mine as I was botting out w/ no weight in the bed. Some guys have also had trouble with the wheel bearing. Other than that, that is all I can think of. Both a VERY good trucks. Just have to decide it you really need the extra room of a Tundra DBL cab or if the Tacoma DBL cab will work. I would suggest putting a car seat in and out of both. I've had a car seat in the back of mine and it was a little snug. GL
     
  7. textoy

    textoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Member:
    #60098
    Messages:
    79
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Fred
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    2011 4x4 TRD DC
    I had a 2004 double cab tundra and in spite of the appearance of being the same size as a 2nd gen tacoma, there is a great deal more room in the tundra than in my 11 double cab tacoma. It is quite a bit wider and light years more room in the back. I'm 6'2" and with the seat all the way back, there was room for someone to sit reasonably comfortably in the back. With a kid on the way, i recommend the tundra.
    As far as gas goes, the tundra will only get 13-15 in town but up to 20-21 on the highway if you drive moderately.(a 2006 may do better than a '4) My Tacoma gets 18 1/2-19 1/2 in town AND on the highway.
     
  8. grivera

    grivera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Member:
    #9474
    Messages:
    782
    Gender:
    Male
    Hanover, MD
    Vehicle:
    '08 DC SR5 4x4, Desert Sand Mica
    Rear Suspension TSB, Bilstein 5100 on all 4 corners-fronts set at 1.75". BFG A/T's @ 265/75/16; Access LE Roll-up cover; Iron Cross Tube SS Steps; Fumoto valve; WeatherTech Liners; AFE Pro-Dry; front side windows tinted 20%; TW Decal!
    My 2 kids (12 & 10) fit just fine in my DC '08. Unless you and/or your wife are really big and/or tall, space will not be an issue in a DC. Based on your description of intended use, I don't see the need for a Tundra. BTW, I average 18-20.5 mpg combined in my Tacoma (89 octane), but I drive with an egg under the go pedal...
     
  9. Ivan

    Ivan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Member:
    #62750
    Messages:
    561
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ivan
    Western Mass
    Vehicle:
    06 Tacoma, 4x4 + SR5
    This thread makes me feel happier about owning a Tacoma
     
  10. bramllr

    bramllr [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Member:
    #63404
    Messages:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    I am not a very big person. 6'1" and my wife is 5'5". We dont plan on using my truck as the main vehicle that we haul the kids in but when I do put them in there I would like it to be some what comfortable.

    Thanks for all the input!:D
     
  11. likeoof808

    likeoof808 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Member:
    #60189
    Messages:
    91
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    rex
    hawaii/LV
    Vehicle:
    black 96 2.7 4x4
    I LOVE MY 2011 TACO! but i kinda wish i had a new tundra...
     
  12. Throughhonor

    Throughhonor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Member:
    #60971
    Messages:
    183
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ryan
    Peoples Republic of New York
    Vehicle:
    2011 SR5 DCSB Debadged
    265/75/16 cooper discoverer at3 tires, American Racing Mojave Teflon rims, Debadged, Black taillights, billies @.85 with eibach coils (front) 2in aal & OME shocks (rear), 4ft firestick w/ midland cb, some crappy chinese notto se hid lights
    seems like you got your answers, but good luck with your son
     
  13. bramllr

    bramllr [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Member:
    #63404
    Messages:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks for sending luck my way. Im sure I will need it! lol
     
  14. orangedevil37

    orangedevil37 RedBull

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Member:
    #70974
    Messages:
    87
    Gender:
    Male
    cincinnati ohio
    Vehicle:
    2010 Tacoma DC 4x4 SR5
    I went from a tundra (2000) to a 2010 taco mgm dbl cab short bed. the loss of power sucks in the taco. I like the seats better in the taco but for passangers the taco sucks even with dbl cab in my opinion. im 6'4 and its rough on anyone whos sets behind me and if I have to move my seat it sucks for me. the only problem I ever had with my tundra was the starter went out. I have had nothing but issues with the Tacoma. bad wheel bearings (3) at 79k miles rear drive went bad along with rear diff. I don't haul anything with the truck and I drive like a oldman. my taco shakes like a damn paintshaker, the bed sucks, the tie downs in the bed suck, the tailgate is weaker than empty pop can and I cant haul any weight in the truck unless I want to spend more money to do it. I like the taco by design but I hate it as well. maybe I got a lemon but I really miss my tundra. my tundra got better gas mileage as well. shouldn't the v-6 be better for mpgs over the v-8?
     
To Top