1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Tacoma vs Tundra

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas' started by CLynch, Oct 20, 2012.

  1. 2004TacomaSR5

    2004TacomaSR5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Member:
    #55722
    Messages:
    3,805
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jon
    Montana
    Vehicle:
    2004 Tacoma DCSB & '79 Toyota Pickup 4WD
  2. xaqori

    xaqori I need gas money

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    Member:
    #80410
    Messages:
    1,762
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Zac
    Marietta, Georgia
    Vehicle:
    '06 4x4 Limo
    ARB lockers and 4.88s front and rear, OME 886s, Dakars, etc., Safari Snorkel, 17"Fuel Revolvers w/ 35x12.50r17 KM2s, fenders cut 3" all around, Pioneer AVH-P4400BH w/ Backup cam, CB/PA (PA Installed), Weathertech Digis, Foglight anytime, AP: front bumper, skids, and pack rack, custom sliders, Warn 9.5XP, dual VIAIR 480Cs with a 2.5gal tank, OTRATTW switches galore, URD y-pipe, RCI skids, LF 240s, etc.
    Okay...at the end of the day I'm a Tacoma fan. But my uncle has a v6 Tundra (2WD and gets 21.8 mpg (~4 mpg better than I get (4WD v6)) and has more room inside the cab for people hauling due to the fold up center console (we both have double cabs). Plus seems more "luxurious" on the inside than the Taco...so don't negate the Tundra over what everyone on here is saying. Go with what you prefer.
     
To Top