The "real" miss usa

....cannot have her own thoughts on this matter-she had better tow the line...
http://www.comcast.net/data/fan/htm...eadline&config=/config/common/fan/default.xml
or she loses!!!!!

 

im not going to offer any of my political views in this thread, but good for her to stand up for what she believes in.

 

They asked a question and she answered it. But I might like to say, what a fucking stupid ass question!!! The Hollywood homo that asked it already knew what answer "he" wanted to hear!!!! The pageant should be ashamed of letting him ask that question. Her best response that would have won her the competition? Look him straight in the eyes and say "It's non of your or anyone else's fucking business what my thoughts on that issue are".

 

i dont like the idea of gay people getting married but i dont think the government, state or federal, can dictate who can marry who. if the church doesn't want to recognize it, fine, thats there prerogative as a private organization. but a state shouldn't be able to tell anyone who they can and cant marry.

 

It's not an issue of "marriage" - that's a red herring.....the REAL issue/ question is this: "Does the government have a say in the perpetuation of the human species and the inhabitants of the state which it governs". In other words, ass fucking doesn't make babies therefore gays can't produce babies and does the government want to endorse, accept, and subsidize this behavior. This is a human species/civilization issue, not a marriage issue.

 

While I disagree with her,I think it's a discrace she was not able to express her opinion without penalty.That pagent and it's judges should be ashamed of themselves,I agree with Pster.The idea of asking these girls cold questions is to determine how they handle themselves under pressure,it's not to find out whose opinions mirror those of the judges.

 

I agree that they shouldn't be allowed to ask questions like that. questions that will obviously alienate them from certain judges if they dont pander. but thats the reality of the world we live in. if you dont pander to your audience, you dont win. that goes for Miss USA, Politics, American Idol.... anything that people are voting for. But i think its cool she stuck by her morals even though it meant taking 2nd place.

 

not really. its a, "can my spouse visit me in the hospital if i get in a wreck issue" or a "can i leave my life insurance to my spouse when i die" etc....

this has nothing to do with perpetuation of the human species. they just want the same civil liberties that straight people enjoy. it makes no sense for a gay couple that have been living together for 20 years not to be able to visit the other if he/she gets in a wreck and is in critical condition in the hospital because they aren't "family".

 

I flatly do not believe your examples are true or accurate. Any person can leave his life insurance to anyone he/she wants. Hospital visits are "friends and family". What gays REALLY want through "equal rights" is ACCEPTANCE AS BEING SEXUALLY NORMAL. That is NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE IT JUST ISN'T TRUE.

 

she's a hottie...post some pics

 

granted, you can choose who you leave life insurance too. but many times people in critical condition or in ICU cannot have visitors that are not family or spouse. There are alot of benefits that come with being recognized as being married by the state. thats all they want. i dont think they care about being classified as "sexually normal". there is no such thing. i'm straight but i'm far from normal. Look at tacoark, she's straight but she's into alot of kinky stuff. "normal" is just something people say. who are you to say what is and isn't normal? for that matter who are politicians (the scummiest people on earth) to say what is and isn't normal? Like you, i dont agree with the gay lifestyle. But i dont feel like it's my place or anyone elses to tell people how they can live (as long as they are not causing others harm)

 

“perpetuation of the human species”??? yeah this country has a real shortage of teen mothers.

 

The government should be taken completly out of marriage. Marriage is an event where two people make a commitment to eachother infront of their God and family and friends.

There should be civil unions provided by the government for anyone that wants to enter into one. This will cover all legal issues of who gets what when people split up. It is a BUSINESS contract between two people. There is no emotion or religion in it. It is strictly business. Gay people should be allowed to be just as misarable as anyone else that wants a divorce.

 

Sexually Normal is when a man and woman have sex to produce a baby. This is COMPLETELY different than what people do "sexually for fun".

 

You make my point for me: So we should all be homosexuals to reduce teen pregnancy? I think not. Again, you compare apples and oranges. My argument is a physiological one, not one of mental competency.

 

Give it time....

 

I think its great she stood up for her beliefs, she should have won just for that...

On the other hand, in my point of view, marriage should be only between man and woman (at least in churchs), but i do believe people has the right to choose their partner whether is the same sex or not, so legally it should be allowed.