1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Toyota to spend $1 billion

Discussion in 'Toyota Trucks & SUVs' started by Lentsnh, Jun 5, 2009.

  1. Jun 5, 2009 at 9:40 AM
    #1
    Lentsnh

    Lentsnh [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Member:
    #10953
    Messages:
    9,550
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2007 Hummer H3 Tactical Edition
    None yet- Future: HIDs, Tinted tails, LED interior lights,
    [​IMG]

    With new fuel and emissions regulations coming into place across the nation, as well as more stringent requirements in California springing up, automakers will be scrambling to follow the new laws that have been set out. Even Toyota, one of the most fuel-efficient manufacturers in the industry, will be struggling to meet California's new requirements for 3% of sales in 2012 to be zero-emission vehicles, and early estimates are predicting that Toyota will have to spend up to $1 billion to meet the goal.

    Currently, California's requirement to sell 3% of vehicles as zero-emissions only applies to manufacturers that sell over 60,000 units a year, placing manufacturers such as Toyota, Honda and Ford directly in the firing line of the legislation. Other manufacturers such as GM and Chrysler will also have to comply with the rules, but the costs for doing so will be significantly less for them than the costs for Toyota and Honda, considering that together the two Japanese companies hold a large percentage of the auto market and thus must spend more money to get more vehicles compliant.

    The estimated $1 billion figure required for Toyota to comply with the new regulations does not just take into account the cost of components needed for building battery-powered vehicles, but also peripheral requirements such as service centers, training for engineers and dealers, marketing, guarantees and warranties, and even new manufacturing equipment.

    With Toyota's current sales figures, 3% of its vehicles sold would constitute around 15,000 zero-emissions vehicles, and should it fail to completely ignore the rule then California can ban the company from selling cars there, although it is unlikely to get to this stage, Bloomberg reports.

    Toyota, and all the major automakers, will have to begin examining how to bring all-electric vehicles to market in time for the regulations, and with work already underway on some form of electric propulsion at most firms, the most difficult aspect will likely be convincing the public to buy the cars, which can often be dearer than comparable conventional models.
     
  2. Jun 5, 2009 at 9:46 AM
    #2
    NAAC3TACO

    NAAC3TACO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Member:
    #8350
    Messages:
    2,562
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5 DCLB 4x4
    Color matched door handles, Weathertech mats, rubber bed mat.
    Welcome to the United Socialist States of America. Just because the govt. tells a car company what to build, doesn't mean people will actually buy them. Toyota should just tell California that it will not sell cars in that state. Car sales generate big tax dollars and California can't afford to lose more income. JMO.
     
  3. Jun 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM
    #3
    Phantom_X-SP

    Phantom_X-SP Rude Boy |><|

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Member:
    #13071
    Messages:
    1,294
    Gender:
    Male
    High Point, NC
    Vehicle:
    08 DC Black Sand Pearl X-SP
    I question the validity of this article based on this piece. The author is stating that the cost for GM and Chrysler to comply with the new rules will cost far less than Toyota and Honda since they (Toyota and Honda) hold a larger part of the market.....what market is he looking at?

    He is correct with Toyota, but Honda holds a small piece of the market...far smaller than GM that is

    http://www.nada.org/NR/rdonlyres/FFD3F07F-22B9-4E9A-AF71-E08603EB19B6/0/May2009NADASalesRecap.pdf

    I guess people can create articles with invalid information if they want since its teh internetz. :notsure:
     
  4. Jun 5, 2009 at 7:14 PM
    #4
    Lentsnh

    Lentsnh [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Member:
    #10953
    Messages:
    9,550
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2007 Hummer H3 Tactical Edition
    None yet- Future: HIDs, Tinted tails, LED interior lights,
    Well it was from Facebook lol
     
  5. Jun 5, 2009 at 7:19 PM
    #5
    Phantom_X-SP

    Phantom_X-SP Rude Boy |><|

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Member:
    #13071
    Messages:
    1,294
    Gender:
    Male
    High Point, NC
    Vehicle:
    08 DC Black Sand Pearl X-SP
    That would explain lol

    btw congrats on post 4,500 :cheers:
     
  6. Jun 5, 2009 at 7:54 PM
    #6
    Lentsnh

    Lentsnh [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Member:
    #10953
    Messages:
    9,550
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2007 Hummer H3 Tactical Edition
    None yet- Future: HIDs, Tinted tails, LED interior lights,
    hahaha Thanks...... Im getting on up there
     
  7. Jun 5, 2009 at 9:09 PM
    #7
    pittim

    pittim Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Member:
    #6939
    Messages:
    11,196
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tim
    IN, PA
    Vehicle:
    Dented and rusty
    Pink slider.
    probably shouldn't have bought back all those first gens :cookiemonster:
     
To Top