Tune questions

When the tune is ready to hit the market we will release more details.

Yes, tested on 87 and 93 octane. 87 octane is around 31 (just reported to me minutes ago) while 93 octane is around 32. Obviously quality of gasoline can and will play a factor.

 

M+W Nexus... Anyone wanna see proof I'm game. Been running on 87 for months with 30-31 KCLV. 91it goes up a bit, but stays in the 31 range.

 

Straight from the 87 pump at quick trip. Mid grade and premium are better yet. PS. Note the load%


This shit is dialed in...

 

Always gonna be a naysayer that need to see our shit. Wait until the cults chime in. This gon be a hoot!

 

I hear other tunes MAX out around 25...

Don't get me wrong, 25 is good for a stock Premium file.

 

This is not original 2.0, am I right?

 

Are we talking about OL or 30+ KCLV? Separate topics...

 

Correct this is a Next Generation "User Tune" being developed.

 

The point was that the tune was created from a 2.0 file and it adjusted in a single trip for the octane that was in the tank. You won't see that with a tune created within a stock file. Yes, a stock file will adjust, but not like that.

 

Thats the point I was making. Original 2.0 cannot learn a sh!t. The derivatives that were based on the original 2.0 between September 2020 and spring 2021 were all the same -knocking and rattling.
I ditched all of them in spring and got help with tuning valves and ig timing.
On premium 92, I'm stable at 25. KDMAX Pro between 26-29 in my case.
I ditch 87 fuel. But it was sitting at 20-21 after changes. 30 is impressive.

 

Well... if Mat was still in here he'd tell you you're wrong, but since the he's not you can either take our word for it or not. However, you're wrong.

30 is impressive. 33.6 is better.

 

There is no map you can adjust to do what Mat changed for OL, I promise you. You can make changes that will affect it, but his code is not accessible through VF for you to change.

 

Nice. Interested to see more. Put that bitch on rollers and blow some minds. No one has been able to post up dyno data worth the shit. Lots of tunes address drive-ability issues and get rave reviews on butt-dyno but don’t dyno well. A few tunes dyno well but don’t provide drive-ability improvement. Anxious to see if someone cracks the code.

 

That's precisely the goal with this file. To finally be able to provide both, real world power, and drivability.

 

We're still working out the logistics on dyno pull for M+W, but it's coming. Will be unaltered, TRUE charts. None of this TW handle edited nonsense. No boasts or claims... Just data.

 

The most important thing to note is @Mooseditty17 is back, and he brought friends...

 

I still have your early tunes around.
Were you able incorporate afr parch?

 

Good luck. Dyno’ing these trucks is a massive pain in the ass. There is a reason all the data looks like shit.

 

Yes.

 

Now we are talking