1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Turbo vs Supercharger

Discussion in 'Performance and Tuning' started by beastlytaco, Oct 16, 2008.

?

Which one: turbo or S/C

  1. Turbo

    325 vote(s)
    28.2%
  2. Supercharger

    656 vote(s)
    57.0%
  3. Dont spend the money on either

    170 vote(s)
    14.8%
  1. Feb 17, 2009 at 1:22 PM
    #101
    type o negative

    type o negative Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Member:
    #12988
    Messages:
    103
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    09 Double Cab TRD Sport - White
    Alright, Im an advocate for both... For highway and Desert Running. I would DEF go turbo. Your RPMs are already up, dont have to worry about turbo lag.

    If we where talking cars, I would prefer a turbo car over a SC car any day. The feeling is unbeatable of a turbo! I had a dodge SRT4 running 27lbs... SOOOOO fun. Way faster then my SC 06 mustang. Way faster then about any car around actually!

    If I where to artificialy aspirate (sp?) my truck, it would def be with a SC. I want the power down low for towing and crawling.

    Just my 2 cents, its all about application.
     
  2. Feb 17, 2009 at 1:24 PM
    #102
    type o negative

    type o negative Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Member:
    #12988
    Messages:
    103
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    09 Double Cab TRD Sport - White
    This one is for Chris, So the air in the Turbo gets warmer like you said, Does the BOV really make enough difference in cooling down the air to be worth it? Or do most people simply use it becuase of the sound? Becuase I LOVED the sound of My BOV! But I just wonder does it cool the air down enough to be around the same temp as the SC?
     
  3. Feb 17, 2009 at 1:25 PM
    #103
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    Not really a fair comparison, as Im SURE the mustange was no where near 27 lbs of boost. And...like I mentioned before, if turbos are the be all and end all of speed, why arent the top fulers running them on their cars??
     
  4. Feb 17, 2009 at 1:32 PM
    #104
    type o negative

    type o negative Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Member:
    #12988
    Messages:
    103
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    09 Double Cab TRD Sport - White

    You are dead on 100%. Let me rephrase. To be able to SC the Mustang to run with the SRT4 I would have had to rebuild the motor to be stronger, I guarantee I could have built that SC'd to be way faster then the SRT 4 but HP per dollar with these 2 paticular applications, the Turbo won hands down. Ive I had the money to build myself a fast car, I would be torn between super charging and turboing... you can build both and make awesome vehicles, look at the Viper Hennesy TT1000. 0-60 in like 2.7 seconds. But yes, SCd cars can do the same just as easy.
     
  5. Feb 17, 2009 at 3:36 PM
    #105
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    The blow off valve has nothing to do with cooling of the air. A Blow off valve is in place to ruduce compressor surge or stall when the throttle is lifted to shift, or whatever, under boosted conditions. If the blow off valve is not in place, and the throttle is lifted from an under boost condition, thus closeing the throttle valve (butterfly), it creates a high pressure "surge" in the intake, traveling back into the turbo compressor, causeing a compressor stall. All the "Cool" POV sounds you hear, more than likely, are tuned to sound that way and serve no purpose other than to make the sound.

    Ok. This being said, I belive the discussion was regarding the Tacoma. The Tacoma being predomantly a truck engine, AND, the superchargers are redilly availibly in many kit forms, thus makeing it the more logical choice for boost. if going for max h.p. and with a well grown and blossomed money tree, either turbo or supercharger will produce whatever gains are desired in these engines. XrunnIT said it well, Turbo is good for power on top. Superchargers are good for power all thru the rev range. To get a turbo to "act" like a supercharger and deliver the power from the low revs to the high, it would require lots of engineering , and trips to the money tree, for a Tacoma aplication.
     
  6. Feb 18, 2009 at 9:18 AM
    #106
    beastlytaco

    beastlytaco [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Member:
    #7660
    Messages:
    4,044
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ian
    Vehicle:
    08 Access Cab SR5
    trips to the money tree

    hahaha i like it
     
  7. Feb 18, 2009 at 11:23 AM
    #107
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    :D
     
  8. Feb 18, 2009 at 11:30 AM
    #108
    type o negative

    type o negative Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Member:
    #12988
    Messages:
    103
    Gender:
    Male
    UT
    Vehicle:
    09 Double Cab TRD Sport - White
    Exactly, Hence why I said I would supercharge MY Tacoma rather then Turbo Charge. Although I think I will just leave mine naturally aspirated.

    Thanks for bringing to light the function of a BOV, I was under a completly wrong impression of its function.

    PS. Where are the seeds for this "Money Tree"? Im in the market for one of those OR a Sugar Momma.. Either way...
     
  9. Feb 18, 2009 at 11:35 AM
    #109
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    Im still looking myself. :)
     
  10. Feb 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM
    #110
    dually

    dually Low and slow

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Member:
    #8205
    Messages:
    3,299
    Gender:
    Male
    Interstate underpass
    Vehicle:
    '16 Inferno SR5 DCLB
    The sad thing is the SC for the tacomas loose their efficiency above... 9psi or so...
     
  11. Mar 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM
    #111
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    So do Turbos. Any compressor looses eficiency the higher the pressure.
     
  12. Mar 2, 2009 at 1:23 PM
    #112
    XrunnIT

    XrunnIT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Member:
    #7770
    Messages:
    845
    Gender:
    Male
    Austin, TX
    Vehicle:
    1GR-GZE X-Runner
    Built Motor by LC Engineering Boosted by TRD
    While that is somewhat accurate...

    For the TRD blower (Eaton MP90) on the 1GR - 10psi, 14k rpms > 90% efficiency. 5psi, 14k rpms - 95% efficiency.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  13. Mar 2, 2009 at 2:04 PM
    #113
    dually

    dually Low and slow

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Member:
    #8205
    Messages:
    3,299
    Gender:
    Male
    Interstate underpass
    Vehicle:
    '16 Inferno SR5 DCLB
    You can always go bigger with the turbo. Not so much with the make/model specific SC.
     
  14. Mar 2, 2009 at 2:16 PM
    #114
    Gr8WhiteTaco

    Gr8WhiteTaco bishes love my haircut

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Member:
    #11964
    Messages:
    2,278
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Aaron
    Knoxville, TN
    Vehicle:
    SOLD 02 Double Cab TRD 4x4
    2005 Mazda 3S hatchback
    i gotta say a turbo, you cant beat the vrrrrrroooooommmmmmm...pissssssshhhhhh sound
     
  15. Mar 2, 2009 at 3:08 PM
    #115
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    Going bigger wont increase efficiency. Look at what Xrunnit posted. No turbo is that efficient.
     
  16. Mar 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
    #116
    beastlytaco

    beastlytaco [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Member:
    #7660
    Messages:
    4,044
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ian
    Vehicle:
    08 Access Cab SR5
    [​IMG]




    IN YO FACE!!!!
     
  17. Mar 2, 2009 at 4:28 PM
    #117
    dually

    dually Low and slow

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Member:
    #8205
    Messages:
    3,299
    Gender:
    Male
    Interstate underpass
    Vehicle:
    '16 Inferno SR5 DCLB
    The thing is, that I dont see SC pushing the same amount of boost and creating the same HP numbers as turbos do. If you want big power, go turbo, wont smooth, easy to use powerband go SC.
     
  18. Mar 2, 2009 at 4:29 PM
    #118
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    Tell the NHRA that turbos make more power....;)
     
  19. Mar 2, 2009 at 4:32 PM
    #119
    dually

    dually Low and slow

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Member:
    #8205
    Messages:
    3,299
    Gender:
    Male
    Interstate underpass
    Vehicle:
    '16 Inferno SR5 DCLB
    Hey man, im talkin tacomas!!!:D Top fuel is another story....
     
  20. Mar 2, 2009 at 4:35 PM
    #120
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,531
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    Thing is, Turbos are cheap, and easy to come by. Now your starting to find SC's being used more frequently as they offer a broader power range than a turbo and they are comming down in price. 10 psi boost out of a super charger is still 10 psi boost out of a turbo. SO, pound for pound, they will make similar power, just the SC will give it to ya off idle, where as the turbo has to spin up a bit.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top