Who's got pizza cutters on their taco?

255/85/16 vs 255/75/17

 

Nice comparison. IMO 85/16 looks more rugged / off-road and 85/17 more street. Neither are bad, I just like the 85/16 look better.

 

33” 10.50 R15 K02’s

 

What sidewall rating are those? I may go this route next tire... load E is breaking my back

 

These are Load E as well if am correct.

 

@boshak Load C. 114 load rating

 

Thanks for the correction.

 

Not sure why anyone would purchase tires based on looks, over their performance characteristics ... form over function just doesn't make sense to me (unless you are building a static display).

 

Same as H3 drivers: "mine is bigger then yours".

 

Running 255/85/16 toyo MT on my 04, had the KM2s before and had to chuck em because I put a hole in the side wall on 3 separate tires all on separate occasions, plus the KM2 is like ice skates in the snow and ice, warning they do rub the frame in last 5% of your turning radius and if you drive yours any kind of hard you will want to cut your pinch welds and trim away as needed

 

Function is always priority. I went 255 for fit with stock wheel offset, no spacer, mpg, narrow tread performance off-road.

But I won’t lie that styling isn’t important.

 

I like my skinnies.

 

Agreed, but it should never be more than a secondary consideration.

 

The same reason people put giant spoilers on 100hp Civics, and chrome trailing arms, dual fox shocks, and balljoint spacer lifts on their trucks.

 

Agree!

 

I agree with you 100%. If I didn't have the tundra brakes in the front I'd run 15s and not have to worry about finding a tire that's not e rated haha

 

At first I thought this thread was about trd sport wheels which to me look like shiny pizza slices.

Love those pics rngr
I really want a white 1st gen.

 

I see it. Haha

 

Running 255/75/17 no rubbing or spacers stock on Rubicons,

 

Exactly my problem!