1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Why did they not use the 4.0 Dual VVT-i V6?

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by Scott K, Dec 30, 2015.

  1. Jan 3, 2016 at 5:33 PM
    #121
    SwollenGoat

    SwollenGoat Onwards and Upwards!

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2014
    Member:
    #144225
    Messages:
    8,234
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    ‘21 ACLB, ‘99 XCLB, ‘92 RC, ‘85 4R
    Yeah, I think people are making mountains out of mole hills. The amount of torque and where it is available in the rpm range, isn't all that much different than the 4.0

    The test drive I took, the new engine seemed fairly strong to me.
     
    Aussiek2000[QUOTED] likes this.
  2. Jan 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM
    #122
    thewarriordinghy

    thewarriordinghy General Lee's Titan

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Member:
    #137669
    Messages:
    6,002
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ben
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    2017 Nissan Titan 4x4
    Temporarily Stock
    But I do have a clue what I'm talking about. Dealer had no die cast of one...
     
  3. Jan 3, 2016 at 5:35 PM
    #123
    Johnny919

    Johnny919 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169739
    Messages:
    1,382
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    2006 Honda Pilot EXL 4WD
    I am just leaving my options open. I wouldn't be wasting my time on here if i wasn't interested in the new tacoma.

    Yeah it is close...but the 4.0 just had way more torque than hp. 236hp and 266tq. 2016 278hp and 265tq (less at a higher rpm)...i just like the idea of having more torque than hp...that is the way it should be in a truck imo. Either way it is super close.
     
  4. Jan 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM
    #124
    Robb_D

    Robb_D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2015
    Member:
    #173478
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Robb
    FoCo
    Vehicle:
    2016 BBP Tacoma DCSB TRDOR
    285/70 17 BFG AT KO2
    So what if the 3.5 has 250ft-lb available from 2000 rpm up aka a relatively flat torque curve?
     
  5. Jan 3, 2016 at 5:42 PM
    #125
    Aussiek2000

    Aussiek2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Member:
    #163499
    Messages:
    5,652
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Offroad AC
    So you don't care if a truck can only go 30mph with 57hp as long as it has torque
     
  6. Jan 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM
    #126
    FirestormInferno

    FirestormInferno Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Member:
    #173042
    Messages:
    61
    Gender:
    Male
    Fixed and answered.
     
    Robb_D and Johnny919[QUOTED] like this.
  7. Jan 3, 2016 at 5:56 PM
    #127
    Johnny919

    Johnny919 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169739
    Messages:
    1,382
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    2006 Honda Pilot EXL 4WD
    That would be nice, but I havn't heard of anyone who has put it on a dyno yet.

    Obviously it has to be balanced...I would have been happier with say 260hp and 280ftlbs...change the cam profiles or whatever to generate more torque and leaa hp at a lower rpm.

    Listen, all i'm saying is im slightly disaapointed. I am sure plenty of other members agree with me. I was really looking forward to this generation after 10 years of waiting. I don't just care about the performance numbers, if i did i would of had bought one of the new gm trucks.

    I thought after 10 years until the next gen they would have done something more. Think about it, all of this has increased mpg by about 2mpg. Like i said plenty of other options, ford coming out with 10 speed auto, gm with 8 speed auto, honda pilot with 9 speed auto, toyota is just behind and they had so much time to do a refresh. Could have gone with newer 4.0 with dual vvti with the 8 speed autos in the lexus. That would have made a huge difference in terms of mpg.

    Either way it is a toyota, therefore it will have the QDR that i am looking for.
     
  8. Jan 3, 2016 at 5:58 PM
    #128
    Aussiek2000

    Aussiek2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Member:
    #163499
    Messages:
    5,652
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Offroad AC
    Drive a 3.6 GM. you'll love the torque the Toyota 3.5 makes afterwards. I drive GMs all day until I get in my toyota to go home
     
    Johnny919 likes this.
  9. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:07 PM
    #129
    Johnny919

    Johnny919 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169739
    Messages:
    1,382
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    2006 Honda Pilot EXL 4WD
    The 4.3 in the gm makes more torque than hp. Every v8 has more torque than hp.

    Also I am pretty sure the 3.5 is not all new as it has been used in some of the lexus models.

    The 4.0 in my jeep makes more torque.
     
  10. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:08 PM
    #130
    Aussiek2000

    Aussiek2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Member:
    #163499
    Messages:
    5,652
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Offroad AC
    I think you're getting a little hung up on 1960 ideology
     
    CanadaToy likes this.
  11. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:09 PM
    #131
    Johnny919

    Johnny919 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169739
    Messages:
    1,382
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    2006 Honda Pilot EXL 4WD
    Well the 4.3 is in the silverado right now. Imagine if it was in a midsize.
     
  12. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:14 PM
    #132
    Aussiek2000

    Aussiek2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Member:
    #163499
    Messages:
    5,652
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Offroad AC
    I suppose you haven't looked at the V6 NA offerings from ford and dodge

    image.jpg
    image.jpg
     
    CanadaToy likes this.
  13. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:14 PM
    #133
    Aussiek2000

    Aussiek2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Member:
    #163499
    Messages:
    5,652
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Offroad AC
    It never will be. We don't even sell them in the full size
     
  14. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:22 PM
    #134
    Johnny919

    Johnny919 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169739
    Messages:
    1,382
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    2006 Honda Pilot EXL 4WD
    I am well aware that there are other v6s in trucks that have more hp than torque. And that 3.6l v6 pentastar blows, i drive a ram promaster for my job and it is terrible. Just because there are not many v6s with more torque does not mean it can't be done...if it was done before and it is currently done with v8s.

    Yeah no kidding it doesn't sell in a fullsize...who wants a v6 in a fullsize? They make all their money from the 5.3 and 6.2. Now if they were to put the 4.3 in the colorado and canyon that would have been much better than the diesel.. I can't imagine that doing we in the u.s market.
     
  15. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:27 PM
    #135
    Aussiek2000

    Aussiek2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Member:
    #163499
    Messages:
    5,652
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Offroad AC
    Your logic is so out of whack. I'm out, good talking with you
     
  16. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:30 PM
    #136
    Johnny919

    Johnny919 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169739
    Messages:
    1,382
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    2006 Honda Pilot EXL 4WD
    Funny, I could say the same thing to you, good.
     
  17. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:31 PM
    #137
    Aussiek2000

    Aussiek2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Member:
    #163499
    Messages:
    5,652
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Offroad AC
    Keep on keeping on with no Tacoma but complaining about them.
     
  18. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:34 PM
    #138
    Johnny919

    Johnny919 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Member:
    #169739
    Messages:
    1,382
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    2006 Honda Pilot EXL 4WD
    Do you work for toyota or something, why are you so mad? Get over yourself. I'm entitiled to do whatever the hell i want.

    If you even read anything I said I never said the new tacoma was bad, i actually prefered it over the other options. Learn how to read.
     
  19. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:43 PM
    #139
    Rambeaux

    Rambeaux Diäb soulé

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2015
    Member:
    #167793
    Messages:
    618
    Gender:
    Male
    Jerkwater, USA
    Vehicle:
    2016 Blk TRD Sport 4X4 DCSB
    Cracked W/S
    Group hug, fellas!!
     
    Aussiek2000 and Johnny919 like this.
  20. Jan 3, 2016 at 6:43 PM
    #140
    2big4arunner

    2big4arunner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2015
    Member:
    #154469
    Messages:
    643
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tyler
    Vernon BC
    Vehicle:
    2015 tacoma dclb
    3/2 leveling kit, 275/60r20 duratracs on xd128 20x9 rims, AFE stage 2 intake, trd exhaust, duel electric fan w/dakota digital controller
    From reading this whole post I think I understand where you are coming from. What I don't think you recognize is this 3.5 comes with two different fuel delivery cycles. The first to deliver best economy and the second for power and torque.
    This would explain why the torque is so high in the rpm band as well as the reaction off the line.
    The European market doesn't have to deal with the emission standards or CAFE. They run way more diesels over there as well including a 4.5L diesel that would make the tundra beyond awesome.
    The dodge v6 is not a bad motor but it isn't designed to be a torque motor. Neither is the Tacoma. Honestly if you want a do all truck that is great off road as well as super high mpg and power. Your asking for a diesel hybrid that hasn't been made yet.

    Regarding the arguments made. If you want to be able to choose your own opinions then you have to be able to accept someone else's opinion on the same subject without retaliation. It then stops being an argument and becomes a discussion.
    My opinion is they picked the wrong motors for off roading and towing but picked a great motor and transmission for the other 95% of the people who use the truck.
    If your considering a ridgeline my only warning is with their transmissions being based off minivan technology that seems to break down a lot. But that might change one day
     
    Johnny919 likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top