Idaho BS thread in the PNW

I think it is basically a 6 wheeled pickup and that is infact the bed and not a trailer is the idea. It is much harder to high center is probably the goal.

 

if engineers like to argue...what do scientists do?

 

Spend all their time trying to prove each other wrong?

 

I think all of the high level science type people love to argue. It is just how science works. Somebody does some research and everyone else tears them apart about what they did wrong and why their results are wrong in one way or another. After enough trials of fixing all those wrong things eventually you can end up with a good theory. haha If we didn't have that we would just end up with a bunch of pseudo-science instead of real science.





Hey Monte, somebody stole your name!
http://www.blackdogcrossfit.com/

 

Ben, you took amazing photos. I will have to return the favor next time. Didn't you get a pic of me sliding back and in line with the tree? Oh and the comments about a girl are fuckin hilarious.

 

Are these the typical C/O's on a 1st gen or is he running 2wd C/O's on there?

http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/su...vers-causing-cv-axle-contact.html#post7686916

 

Is it just me or is this kind of a mind fuck? haha

 

yea normal.

im going to copy his rear setup or similar to it.

 

Weird. You guy don't have problems with your CV's rubbing on the coils?

On 2nd gens we have like a 3" long end rod to clear the CV shaft.

 

nope. Our geometery is different then yours.

2wd can run flat bottom CO.

 

I see.

 

That and you bottom the shock out instead of the bump. That doesn't work well no matter what you drive.

 

HA! i am applying for an automoblie photography position for for sale ads..ha..yea..desperate..

 

Then your shocks still had enough up travel for the spacers.

Cameron never had any problem with his. I think the people that had the problems were running like 3"+ long spacers making the collapsed length of the shock too long and resulting in a bent shaft.

 

the 90s was an interesting time for music to say the least..a lot of new things

and yea..that made sense to me..and every other musician out there haha

No different the you saying some weird engineering thing most of us wouldn't get..everything thing has its only dialect and language..which is cool..and sad/confusing at the same time..haha

 

mmmm....idk about that...thats a bold statement..

 

yea i understand that..but i mean..engineering is a fairly modern term wouldn't you agree?

i mean..like..looking at it from a historical perspective is what im saying..by todays standards i totally agree with you..sorta..cause i have been on the "builder" side of what an engineer has designed and i can't tell you how ofter then builders change it to make it work..so..yea..but thats different.

I guess what i mean is back in the day..people did stuff that weren't necessarily engineers..hell even know more "normal" people are making scientific breakthroughs more then ever..

Yea engineers apply the science..but i wouldn't go as far as to say without them it would all be mostly philosophy..make sense?

 

C
C
C
C
C
C
CHEMISTRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY


MOTHAFUCKA'S

WHY THE FUCK YO WATER WET?
CHEMISTRY

HOW THE FUCK NESQUIK WORK?
CHEMISTRY

 

Those got unbolted and thrown away a long time ago for me..

I think it's beautifull. you know if your into that sorta thing

 

Sweet!