Difference between the Camburg Tacoma Ball Joint UCAs, CAM-310039 and CAM-310080?

Only difference I can see, is that the CAM-310080 come pre-installed with MOOG ball joints...







Has anyone purchased any CAM-310039 recently?

thanks

 

Not sure where you are seeing that but the part number CAM-310039 is a discontinued part. Those are the old style balljoint UCAs that utilize the stock b/j. Those arms were replaced with the CAM-310080 that are made to fit a MOOG balljoint only.

 

Thanks for the education

 

Cant go wrong with the Camburg BJ UCA's, I love em!!!!

 

Ordered mine today

 

Your gonna love em!!

 

Camburgs going in today

 

Was pretty straight forward install.

Lubed them up with Super Lube PTFE




Thank you TacomaWorld Community for your assistance...it is appreciated

Alignment shop is next on the list.

 

Look good!!!!

 

Need to find a new Alignment Guy.

Here are the BEFORE specs (notice Caster is 2+, due to newly installed Camburg UCAs):




Here are the Current Specs.
The Alignment Guy said it is the best he could do...

The truck drives fine around town...but I was hoping for more caster

 

^^^ Probably have the lower control arm alignment cams facing the wrong.

 

Thanks Dan,
Will post up some pics tomorrow.

 

Drivers-Side Alignment cam Pics...

Forward-front (hub position/orientation ->)




Forward-rear (hub position/orientation <-)




Rearward-front (hub position/orientation ->)




Rearward-rear (hub position/orientation <-)

 

All assistance with my alignment issues (lack of caster) would be appreciated

 

Have you resolved your caster issue, if so what were you final alignment #

Thanks

 

The following are the current alignment specs...post UCA install



The caster is set back to Stock
The Good news is it no longer pulls to one side

I requested More caster and from the "Before Measurements" values, higher values are possible...

Looks like I'm going to have to find another Tech.

 

Thanks for the input, I'm debating going back to LR UCA or Camburg. Like the Camburg, but I can't seem to find to many people having a 2.5 to 3 "lift with Camburg UCA, ball joint type, and final alignment at 0,0 and 2.5 to 3 caster. Is it the alignment techs, or the UCA??

 

I'm running Camburg UCAs, Bilstein 6112s at the top setting (for a 3" lift), Moog ball joints, with the alignment within factory specs.

The truck drives great.

My alignment guys think 2.5 to 3 is too much caster, even with the extended UCAs.

 

I have the Camburgs with the Moog BJ's I am at 0/0 with caster at 2.2 pass 2.28 drivers. It drives straight and don't have any issues.