1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

4cyl vs 6? prerunner vs "normal"?

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas' started by T-Ray, Jul 8, 2009.

  1. Jul 8, 2009 at 1:56 PM
    #1
    T-Ray

    T-Ray [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Member:
    #19392
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm lookin at buyin either a Tacoma, Ranger, or Frontier. I have a few questions:
    1. Would I feel a lack of power in a 4cyl?
    2. Is there really anything a 4cyl can't do (not gonna be rock crawling or gettin in thick mud)?
    3. I have found a 4cyl manual 2002 not prerunner and a 4cyl auto 2002 is a prerunner. Other than the color, is there any difference in the looks of a stock "normal" vs prerunner? Which would you suggest? The man. has less than 60k miles and the auto aroud 85k.
    4. I can't find any 6cyl manuals, so it'll be either one of the two above or an auto 6 Ranger or Frontier. I know this is a toyota forum, but what would be better? What kind of gas mileage could i expect from a man. 6, auto 6, man. 4, and auto 4? (might be able to really search and find a man. 6)
    I think thats it right now, will update if I think of anything more.
     
  2. Jul 8, 2009 at 1:57 PM
    #2
    beastlytaco

    beastlytaco This is TW. One never knows what is a joke anymore

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Member:
    #7660
    Messages:
    4,072
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ian
    Vehicle:
    08 tacoma standard cab
    15% tinted back window, 25% on sides. Jardine catback exhaust system. horn modification, AFE pro dry S filter and secondary filter removed. All weather toyota tacoma mats.
    i think that you will find that the 4 cyl tacoma has PLENTY of power. and its very good on gas
     
  3. Jul 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM
    #3
    T-Ray

    T-Ray [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Member:
    #19392
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    So what would you recommend in the way of prerunner or not? Prerunner is auto, not is man.
     
  4. Jul 8, 2009 at 2:07 PM
    #4
    NAAC3TACO

    NAAC3TACO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Member:
    #8350
    Messages:
    2,558
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5 DCLB 4x4
    Color matched door handles, Weathertech mats, rubber bed mat.
    Prerunner is 2wd with a 4wd suspension. They are available with auto or manual trans.
     
  5. Jul 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM
    #5
    NAAC3TACO

    NAAC3TACO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Member:
    #8350
    Messages:
    2,558
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5 DCLB 4x4
    Color matched door handles, Weathertech mats, rubber bed mat.
    As far as the engines go, I have a 4x4 2.7 Access Cab. The truck is a little slow in 1st gear, but once you are rolling it does fine. I average about 21 mpg in mixed driving. If you can afford the slightly lower gas mileage and the higher MSRP, I would get the V6. The Ranger v6 and Frontier v6 are gas guzzling pigs. Stick with the Tacoma. You won't be sorry. JMO.
     
  6. Jul 8, 2009 at 2:31 PM
    #6
    T-Ray

    T-Ray [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Member:
    #19392
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    I can only find a prerunner with auto 4cyl, so would ya'll recommend the auto prerunner or a manual 4cyl that is not a prerunner? both 2002 models, and is there any difference in the physical appearance? the photos are not the greatest that I have seen.
     
  7. Jul 8, 2009 at 3:05 PM
    #7
    NAAC3TACO

    NAAC3TACO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Member:
    #8350
    Messages:
    2,558
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5 DCLB 4x4
    Color matched door handles, Weathertech mats, rubber bed mat.
    I think prerunners look better, because they look like 4x4s. Some people like the low to the ground look. It's all a matter of personal taste.
     
  8. Jul 8, 2009 at 3:07 PM
    #8
    matthew5olson

    matthew5olson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Member:
    #11782
    Messages:
    484
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    matthew
    pittsburgh, PA
    Vehicle:
    04 ext cab 3.4L 5spd 4x4 sr5
    K&N cold air intake, doug thorley headers, rear sensor simulator, flowmaster 40 series, magnecor plug wires, Royal Purple synthetic gear lube, airaid throttle body spacer, Hyperground system, flex-a-lite elec fan.
    go take them for a real test drive. I drove mine for an hour before I said "ok". Test them out. they are used so your not hurting them by putting 50-75 miles on them. Figure out what you want not what others tell you is good. Everyone's circumstances are different. After you figure which options you want find THAT EXACT TRUCK. You won't be sorry I drove over 750 miles looking for the truck I wanted. I don't regret any of it. Everytime I get in the truck I remember how awesome it is. Also buy the online subsrciption to consumer reports and read the reviews on the trucks. They were right on with every truck I test drove. I wouldn't get a ford at all costs. Do not get a 6cyl nissan. My uncle is a nissan mechanic. The 3.3L 6cyl are horrible gas hogs. The newer 4.0L V6's are actually more powerful than toyota's (not sure about gas mileage on these) I would stick with any type of tacoma or a 4 cyl frontier
     
  9. Jul 8, 2009 at 3:14 PM
    #9
    NAAC3TACO

    NAAC3TACO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Member:
    #8350
    Messages:
    2,558
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5 DCLB 4x4
    Color matched door handles, Weathertech mats, rubber bed mat.
    I hear the 4.0 Nissan is a gas hog too.
     
  10. Jul 8, 2009 at 3:22 PM
    #10
    j_cyrus

    j_cyrus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    Member:
    #18093
    Messages:
    353
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    catdick
    Livingston TN
    Vehicle:
    01 Tacma
    My brother has a 99 3.0 ranger, 5 spd and he only gets about 16mpg. I am getting anywhere from 18-20 out of mine (5 spd).
     
  11. Jul 8, 2009 at 3:29 PM
    #11
    metalranger33

    metalranger33 mother of god!!!!!!!

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Member:
    #19446
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    weslaco
    Vehicle:
    02 PreRunner quad cab w/ TRD
    n/a
    I have a 02 Tacoma prerunner double cab (auto), and the v6 has plenty of power but sucks on gas....if gas is a issue id go with the 4cyl...I actually drove a 4cyl and thats a nice little engine
     
  12. Jul 8, 2009 at 4:57 PM
    #12
    ChrisYoTaCoMa

    ChrisYoTaCoMa Chrome's for Harleys and old farts

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Member:
    #17828
    Messages:
    581
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chris
    Estero, Floriduh
    Vehicle:
    00 Taco 4x4 Ex cab 2.7 sr5 AT
    New Pioneer stereo, and all 4 speakers with Infinity components. Sirius satellite radio. Deckplate mod done. Door buzzer silenced forever thank God, tinted windows, vent visors, hood protector(bug guard), ceramic pads and new rotors, dechromed EVERYTHING. 2" Lift front 3" rear. Skyjacker AAL's and replacement leafs(and front spacers) from Fatbobsgarage.com. Skyjacker 7000 Hydro rear shocks, those Bilstein 5100 fronts are coming soon!
    I have owned a 99 Ranger with the 3.0, and a 91 Ranger with the 2.9. BOTH sucked on gas. And to be 100% honest, my 2.7 Tacoma 4x4 gets 20mpg mostly city, is an automatic, and has as much power if not better than both of my rangers with the V6, OR my 1989 Bronco 2 2.9 V6, which I loved dearly. All 3 of my Fords were 5 speeds... I also owned a 1991 S-10 Blazer 4x4 4.3L v6, which was a serios PIG, and hated that thing. Nothing has beaten the quality, enjoyability, looks, performance and happiness as my Tacoma has brought. As for Nissan, I just think they are ugly as shit... Frontiers look cheap, and pretty much butt. Titans from what my friend who owned on says it was crap, Armadas are super FUGLY. All I like from Nissan is thier cars.

    If I were to choose, you know what I would take, but if I were forced between Ford or Nissan, I would buy a ranger.... GO FOR A TACO..... And I am not being biased...LOL.
     
  13. Jul 8, 2009 at 5:09 PM
    #13
    black98

    black98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Member:
    #19075
    Messages:
    52
    Gender:
    Male
    Austin
    Vehicle:
    1998 PreRunner
    I would go with a V6 if you can find it. That's my vote. From wikipedia:

    So I was under the impression they did not make a 5-speed V6 pre-runner, due to this. However I know I have seen 4X4 tacos that were 5-speed. Do we need to change the wikipedia entry?
     
  14. Jul 8, 2009 at 5:29 PM
    #14
    NAAC3TACO

    NAAC3TACO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Member:
    #8350
    Messages:
    2,558
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5 DCLB 4x4
    Color matched door handles, Weathertech mats, rubber bed mat.
    I don't know about the 1st gen tacos, but the second gen 4x4s come with a 5 spd if you have a 2.7 (like mine) or a 6 spd if you have the 4.0. The 4.0 is also available with the 5 spd automatic.
     
  15. Jul 8, 2009 at 5:48 PM
    #15
    ChrisYoTaCoMa

    ChrisYoTaCoMa Chrome's for Harleys and old farts

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Member:
    #17828
    Messages:
    581
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chris
    Estero, Floriduh
    Vehicle:
    00 Taco 4x4 Ex cab 2.7 sr5 AT
    New Pioneer stereo, and all 4 speakers with Infinity components. Sirius satellite radio. Deckplate mod done. Door buzzer silenced forever thank God, tinted windows, vent visors, hood protector(bug guard), ceramic pads and new rotors, dechromed EVERYTHING. 2" Lift front 3" rear. Skyjacker AAL's and replacement leafs(and front spacers) from Fatbobsgarage.com. Skyjacker 7000 Hydro rear shocks, those Bilstein 5100 fronts are coming soon!
    1st Gens come with a 5 speed in the 4cyl and v6.
     
  16. Jul 8, 2009 at 5:57 PM
    #16
    matthew5olson

    matthew5olson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Member:
    #11782
    Messages:
    484
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    matthew
    pittsburgh, PA
    Vehicle:
    04 ext cab 3.4L 5spd 4x4 sr5
    K&N cold air intake, doug thorley headers, rear sensor simulator, flowmaster 40 series, magnecor plug wires, Royal Purple synthetic gear lube, airaid throttle body spacer, Hyperground system, flex-a-lite elec fan.
    perhaps the pre-runner does not. I have a 4x4 trd 5 speed and mines a 6cyl
     
  17. Jul 8, 2009 at 5:58 PM
    #17
    matthew5olson

    matthew5olson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Member:
    #11782
    Messages:
    484
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    matthew
    pittsburgh, PA
    Vehicle:
    04 ext cab 3.4L 5spd 4x4 sr5
    K&N cold air intake, doug thorley headers, rear sensor simulator, flowmaster 40 series, magnecor plug wires, Royal Purple synthetic gear lube, airaid throttle body spacer, Hyperground system, flex-a-lite elec fan.
    having the extra power of a v6 has come in handy many times
     
  18. Jul 8, 2009 at 5:59 PM
    #18
    rab89

    rab89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Member:
    #12578
    Messages:
    5,521
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ross
    Kelowna b.c canada
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCLB
    Grillcraft mx black upper and lower BHLM with Gloss black 265 70 17 bfg a/t center console light mini mag mounted in center console debadged bed lights 35W 5000k HID's
    6 cyl manual. the 4 cyl will be SO slow, eve my 6 isn't much...
     
  19. Jul 8, 2009 at 6:09 PM
    #19
    jflan

    jflan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2008
    Member:
    #11901
    Messages:
    1,019
    Vancouver, WA
    Vehicle:
    09 Access 4x4 2.7L manual SR5
    SnugTop SuperSport Sportsman keyless cap Weathertech mats - OEM skidplate - OEM hitch
    2WD non-Prerunner is low slung and usually very plain-jane looking....Prerunner is cool because it has 4x4 suspension and sits up like a 4x4.
    A Prerunner might also have a better trim package and enhanced traction.
    Personally, I would not want a 2.7 with an automatic trans....but that's my opinion, do some test drives.
     
  20. Jul 8, 2009 at 8:19 PM
    #20
    saltbranch

    saltbranch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Member:
    #16183
    Messages:
    138
    Gender:
    Male
    Tx
    Vehicle:
    1996 2.4,2wd,5spd, stock, 250k
    T-ray, you need to evaluate what you want to do with the truck and what you expect. I mainly drive mine to and from work and very seldom use it in towing, if i do tow its a small trailer.
    You need to think about if you like the low sitting trucks or the higher sitting Pre Runners.
    Me- I want hi a MPG truck that will run alot of miles at low cost. I want it to run 70-80 on hwy, mine does easily. I am a standard tranny guy from the get go, in my experience they will take more abuse, plus I like them better. On my truck,my complaint is cargo capacity/rear springs- posted that in another thread.
    Toyota has the best aftermarket support hands down for small trucks, that might play into your needs. If your planning on towing alot or want power go v6, if you want MPG and dont mind not being able to beat traffic when merging on the hwy go 4 cyl.
    I get in the hi 20's- low 30' on mpg to ranch,depending on cargo weight to and from, plus idling driving on ranch roads.
    To and from work is 19 miles each way, if I keep it at 65 mph- 1/2 a tank or less for 5 days driving. 70 and above fuel consumption goes up on my truck.
     
To Top