1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Argument starter: Power/MPG with Leer cap on 4 cyl. double cab PreRunner

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by Thinkerer, Jun 14, 2012.

  1. Jun 14, 2012 at 5:09 PM
    #1
    Thinkerer

    Thinkerer [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Member:
    #59078
    Messages:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Scott
    Central Illinois
    Vehicle:
    2012 Double Cab PreRunner for the freeway.
    Got a 2012 2WD double cab prerunner with the 2.7 I4/auto since it matches what we actually do with a truck (nearly no towing, a bit of light hauling and a lot of on-road driving). So far I'm loving it - enough power for anything I really do and certainly better mileage than my (t)rusty F-150 that it's replacing. And it looks good.

    In a high headwind (20+mph) at freeway speeds (70 - 75mph), the engine is on the edge of what it will reasonably handle - putting it on cruise control pretty much locks it into a downshift, though you can manually drive it so that it stays in 4th and maintains speed. Gas mileage is in the 18-19 mpg range under these conditions.

    What will happen if I put a cap (I'm looking at the Leer XQ100) on it? A slight reduction of mileage would be okay, but if I can't maintain freeway speed it won't be a good day. Flat bed covers aren't really an option since dry storage volume is needed.

    Opinions are all over the place on this...anyone have experiences to share?
     
  2. Jun 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM
    #2
    BamaToy1997

    BamaToy1997 ASE Master Tech Vendor

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Member:
    #71846
    Messages:
    9,457
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bill
    Navarre, FL
    Vehicle:
    1997 Tacoma 4X4 AKA "Blue Beast"
    Multi-point tow hooks, new bored 2.7L engine, custom paint. 3 inch adjustable Fabtech front coils, 2.5 inch rear AAL. Front Aussie locker. LED bed lights. Full LED conversion interior and exterior. Relentless Fabrication front and rear bumpers. 4X4innovation sliders. BAMF bed rack. CVT rooftop tent.
    What you are looking at for mileage changes are weight, and aerodynamics. Most likely, and this is not a rule, the loss of mileage from weight will most likely be regained by the increase in aerodynamics. A lot depends on the shape of the cap, and the weight of it obviously. I doubt you will see much of a difference, if any at all.

    Overall, I would say if you do mostly highway driving, you won't notice a change, but if you do mostly city driving, you might have a minute loss of .25 mpg. Think of it this way, you are adding the weight of an average male to your truck. Same as adding an additional passenger. Have you ever noticed a change in your mileage by having an extra person in the vehicle? Doubtful.
     
  3. Jun 21, 2012 at 7:04 AM
    #3
    knucklehead

    knucklehead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Member:
    #77990
    Messages:
    273
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Ottawa
    Vehicle:
    SR5 4x4
    Hitch, nav header
    It is aerodynamically suicide.
    What you will have after installing a cap, is a big flat wall on the back of your truck. The bigger the flat wall, the more air you will drag along behind you. Ideally, you would want a cap that slopes down to flush with the top of the tailgate. This would actually improve efficiency.
     
  4. Jun 21, 2012 at 7:17 AM
    #4
    Pugga

    Pugga Pasti-Dip Free Since 1983

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Member:
    #39131
    Messages:
    28,978
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    '13 Ford F-150 SCREW
    F-150 Mod
    The Leer 100Xq DOES slope on the back... It's not aerodynamically perfect, but it certainly won't make anything any worse.

    Honestly, you won't notice much of a difference at highway speed in either MPG or power loss (maybe on long, steep hills the extra weight would be noticable but they're really not THAT heavy). You might notice the truck being a little more sluggish around town due to the extra weight though.
     
  5. Jun 21, 2012 at 8:05 AM
    #5
    knucklehead

    knucklehead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Member:
    #77990
    Messages:
    273
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Ottawa
    Vehicle:
    SR5 4x4
    Hitch, nav header
    leer 100xq, notice horizontal roof, vertical back:

    [​IMG]


    aerodynamic sloping:

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Jun 21, 2012 at 8:08 AM
    #6
    Pugga

    Pugga Pasti-Dip Free Since 1983

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Member:
    #39131
    Messages:
    28,978
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    '13 Ford F-150 SCREW
    F-150 Mod
    Like I said, it's not aerodynamically perfect, but it won't make a difference over stock... It's sloped enough so it won't create a suction like you were talking about. The gentle curve of the XQ is enough to help airflow. To get suction like you were referring to, you need a true vertical back and sharp corners like a tractor trailer bulk hauler or box truck.
     
  7. Jun 21, 2012 at 8:27 AM
    #7
    knucklehead

    knucklehead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Member:
    #77990
    Messages:
    273
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Ottawa
    Vehicle:
    SR5 4x4
    Hitch, nav header
    When open, it is somewhat aerodynamic, because it is open. Fluids dont give a rat's ass if the corners are sharp or round, and that very very minor slope of the back window will not amout to anything at all. Try it in a wind tunnel and you will see just how bad that actually is.

    The curves on that thing are cosmetic.
     
  8. Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM
    #8
    Pugga

    Pugga Pasti-Dip Free Since 1983

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Member:
    #39131
    Messages:
    28,978
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    '13 Ford F-150 SCREW
    F-150 Mod
    Curves vs. straight cuts make a very big difference when it comes to aerodynamics...

    Once again, I said it's not aerodynamically perfect but the base, unmodified pickup is far from perfect either. The addition of the shell won't make it any worse and certainly isn't 'aerodynamic suicide' as you so nicely put it.
     
  9. Jun 21, 2012 at 8:35 AM
    #9
    hookedontronics

    hookedontronics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Member:
    #28863
    Messages:
    2,791
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jake
    Glenville, NY
    Vehicle:
    2010 DC Off Road 4x4
    Icon extended travel 3.5" front coilovers, DSM UCAs, TSB leaf pack w/ wheelers AAL, All Pro U-bolt flip kit, Walker Evans 2.0 rear shocks, 18" XD Monster rims, Nitto trail grappler 285/65R18 Tires, Color matched grill, Grillcraft, Kragen HIDs, Carling switches, my bed light mod, diff drop, Alpine IVA-W505, JL Audio C5 componets and coaxials, JL 300/4 and 250/1 amps and JL stealthbox, wheathertechs, avs vent visors, toyota bed x-tender, alcantara center console cover and door pocket covers, console vault, color matched mirrors, heated mirrors, etc etc etc
    BamaToy1997
    love your sig
     
  10. Jun 21, 2012 at 6:10 PM
    #10
    TroutBum

    TroutBum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Member:
    #8871
    Messages:
    217
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Michigan
    Vehicle:
    06 SR5 Access Cab 4x4
    Leer 100R
    Another vote for "you won't notice a difference".

    Mike
     
  11. Jun 21, 2012 at 6:19 PM
    #11
    BuzzardsGottaEat

    BuzzardsGottaEat "Pick up some speed.. You'll make it."

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Member:
    #55669
    Messages:
    5,637
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chaz
    Nebraska/South Dakota
    Vehicle:
    93 Pickup 4x4 [22R-E] 5MT
    OME suspension, LCE Performance parts, Konigs, etc. [see build]
    Slight decrease with a topper. Less aerodynamic however those who say not noticeable/barely noticeable are also correct. make up the difference with some exhaust mods, i.e., header, cat back, 2nd air filter delete. All of which will give you very little gain, but, will help haul a little extra weight up a hill and on the highway. . . my .02
     
  12. Jun 21, 2012 at 6:21 PM
    #12
    OZ-T

    OZ-T All of those moments....will be lost.....in time

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Member:
    #27584
    Messages:
    23,857
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Peter North
    British Columbia
    Vehicle:
    Mag Grey 09 Trd Sport DCLB 4x4
    OME 885x , OME shocks and Dakars , Wheelers SuperBumps front and rear , 275/70/17 Hankook ATm , OEM bed mat , Weathertech digifit floor liners , Weathertech in-channel vents , headache rack , Leer 100RCC commercial canopy , TRD bedside decals removed , Devil Horns by Andres , HomerTaco Satoshi
    Can the 4cyl HAVE less power ?
     
  13. Jun 21, 2012 at 6:38 PM
    #13
    Rackster

    Rackster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Member:
    #78628
    Messages:
    381
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Connecticut
    Vehicle:
    '04 E/cab 4x4 2.7 Auto SR5
  14. Jun 25, 2012 at 6:04 AM
    #14
    BamaToy1997

    BamaToy1997 ASE Master Tech Vendor

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Member:
    #71846
    Messages:
    9,457
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bill
    Navarre, FL
    Vehicle:
    1997 Tacoma 4X4 AKA "Blue Beast"
    Multi-point tow hooks, new bored 2.7L engine, custom paint. 3 inch adjustable Fabtech front coils, 2.5 inch rear AAL. Front Aussie locker. LED bed lights. Full LED conversion interior and exterior. Relentless Fabrication front and rear bumpers. 4X4innovation sliders. BAMF bed rack. CVT rooftop tent.
    Thank you. Seems pretty popular here.
    Dropping the tailgate does absolutely nothing to improve MPG. It has been disproved several times. Actually most studies have shown that lowering the tailgate has actually increased drag, and LOWERED the MPG of the trucks. While there are many ideas behind the different toppers and such, the real question is what will the truck be used for, how much cargo will be carried, and personal preference of the owner. While I agree that the sloped topper is better for MPG, I think it looks ugly as all hell! I would never put that on my truck. Again that is personal preference though. Also the sloped topper reduces the cubic feet of storage space on the inside. If the OP were wanting to carry several large boxes on a regular basis, then the sloped design would not look well. If all the OP was concerned with was fuel efficiency, then a sloped topper or a tonneau cover would be good.
     
  15. Jun 25, 2012 at 9:57 AM
    #15
    Rackster

    Rackster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Member:
    #78628
    Messages:
    381
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Connecticut
    Vehicle:
    '04 E/cab 4x4 2.7 Auto SR5
    Some further discussion worth reviewing - http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/2nd-gen-tacomas/225996-tonneau-fuel-economy-experiment.html

    Yes, unless the slope is designed into the vehicle, it does look out of place to me. But I can appreciate the experimentation and a pursuit to optimize fuel economy. Pragmatism and practicality of design is essential to the everyday needs of the owner/operator. That's why they have box trucks and bulldozers: practical for the need/application.

    Check out the imbedded links in the thread link above. Lots more reading but it helps to shape theory.

    Good luck!
     
  16. Jun 25, 2012 at 8:41 PM
    #16
    chriss

    chriss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2010
    Member:
    #38206
    Messages:
    100
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    chris
  17. Jun 26, 2012 at 1:59 PM
    #17
    UberZogster

    UberZogster Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Member:
    #81362
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    2010 AC 4x4 5speed
  18. Jul 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM
    #18
    Thinkerer

    Thinkerer [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Member:
    #59078
    Messages:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Scott
    Central Illinois
    Vehicle:
    2012 Double Cab PreRunner for the freeway.
    Thanks everyone - I've ordered it and we'll see about the power (the tests will be thoroughly subjective and ad-hoc, and that assumes I can find a reasonably calm day out here in the prairie). Read the Cal State study and am amazed that nobody's really gone through this thoroughly with anything but a student's simulation project (no funding = no study, but still...).

    BamaToy: "Have you ever noticed a change in your mileage by having an extra person in the vehicle?" If I had your sig as the extra person, there would be a definite change in mileage (particularly after my wife found out).
     
  19. Jul 2, 2012 at 8:49 PM
    #19
    Thinkerer

    Thinkerer [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Member:
    #59078
    Messages:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Scott
    Central Illinois
    Vehicle:
    2012 Double Cab PreRunner for the freeway.
    Results are in: Pugga is right. No change in engine's ability to hold speed on the freeway (test method is to take a particularly flat stretch of interstate and keep bumping the cruise control up until the transmission starts to downshift - 82mph indicated [80 actual] in both cases). Slightly more sluggish as if there were another person aboard*.

    *Sadly, not BamaToy's sig-other-person.
     
  20. May 5, 2013 at 8:36 PM
    #20
    list2002

    list2002 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Member:
    #87673
    Messages:
    13
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB I4 PreRunner SR5
    Thanks for doing the leg work, getting one soon and was wondering the same thing. Got the I4 DCSB for exact same reasons you did. It's all I need. Wouldn't be worth it to me if the MPG drop was severe as that was a reason I got it as well. No reservations now, looking forward to getting it.
     
To Top