1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

comparing tundra 4x4 with ford f series

Discussion in 'Tundras' started by sunflower, Mar 25, 2012.

  1. Oct 18, 2012 at 8:02 AM
    #21
    nathan3306

    nathan3306 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Member:
    #83300
    Messages:
    347
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Nathan
    Charleston AFB, SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 SR5 DC 4X4

    I hate to bust your bubble but that is not a towing test for the ECO. That is a 2009 F-150 with a 5.4L
    That being said, the tundra 5.7L will out perform the Ford 5.4L anyday of the week! Both are good motors but built in different ways.
    Now the "NEW" F-150 line up (2011+) recieve their brand new motors. 3.7L V6 good for the everyday truck, this was Ford's replacement for the Ranger
    5.0L V8 great all around motor
    3.5L V6 ecoboost built for heavier duty
    6.2L big block V8 built for whatever including sucking down some serious gas

    I only post this in response to the sled towing article above.:rolleyes:
    You can research pickuptrucks.com and see the F-150 was their choice in 2008. http://special-reports.pickuptrucks.com/2008/11/best-overall-ha.html

    Since said test were conducted the full size half ton line up has yet to really change except for the Ford engine line up. Let me tell you the new engines are BY FAR GREATER in ever aspec than the engines they replaced.

    So, I would consider the F-150 being my number one pick, two would be the Tundra. These two trucks offer great all around performance and they have plently of room in the 4 door config cabs.

    Thrid would be the RAM. Nice interior and good power from the hemi but that is about it. Oh, it rides well with it's sweet coil springs in the back.

    Fourth would be Chevy/GMC. These trucks are out dated IMO. They still use rear drum brakes! I stoped looking at the truck right there.

    I've owned my 2004 5.4L F-150 4X4 since 07. She has never let me down and does everything I want it to do. I get about the same MPG's as my 12' taco. City the taco is way better but HWY I think I can pull better numbers. I really like the fully boxed frame on my Ford as well.


    Either way you can't go wrong with Ford or Toyota. That's why they have a patnership. I think you get more bang for your buck with the Ford but to each his/her own.:D

    Nate
     
  2. Oct 18, 2012 at 8:06 AM
    #22
    nathan3306

    nathan3306 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Member:
    #83300
    Messages:
    347
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Nathan
    Charleston AFB, SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 SR5 DC 4X4
    And I just noticed this is an old thread.... Sorry but maybe my info will help others.
     
  3. Oct 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM
    #23
    whippersnapper02

    whippersnapper02 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Member:
    #27905
    Messages:
    35,214
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Christian
    Yorba Linda, CA
    Vehicle:
    10 MGM TRD OR 4wd Auto DCSB
    Banks Monster Exhaust, Pop n Lock tailgate lock, Hook-Ups tie down brackets, USA Spec Ipod adaptor, WO seat covers, color matched grill with Grillcraft insert, Tuffy locking bed box
    Rear drums work just fine. What is this obsession withe rear disc? They wont make you stop like a 911.
     
  4. Oct 18, 2012 at 8:19 AM
    #24
    Delmarva

    Delmarva Mayor of TW

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Member:
    #10148
    Messages:
    35,607
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Tucson, AZ
    Vehicle:
    09 TRD OR S/C 4x4
    TRD S/C, Full OME Suspension, LR UCAs, Relentless Front Bumper, Derpwerx Fab HC Rear Bumper, 285/75/16 Revos, XD Hoss Wheels, Safari Snorkel, Infiniti FX-R HID Retrofit, Airbags in rear, Optima Yellow top, Besttop, All-Pro Skid, All-Pro HD Sliders
    x2... I think people want them cause they look cooler through their 22" rims...
     
  5. Oct 18, 2012 at 8:22 AM
    #25
    Manwithoutaplan

    Manwithoutaplan the full Monty

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Member:
    #4500
    Messages:
    46,513
    Gender:
    Male
    ID
    Vehicle:
    07 Tacoma Speedway Blue Trd 4x4
    -Nitro 4.56 gears - Arb Front and Rear lockers. -Rear Swing out bumper Curiosity of ( Dept .94) https://www.facebook.com/Dept94 -Tinted, -ProComp 6 inch lift with Icon Coil overs and Bilstein's 7100Resi -315/70/17 - 17x8 in Pro Comp Matte black rims 4.5 bs -East Coast Gear Supply Sliders -ALL Pro EXP LEaf pack -Camburg UCA's -CAB mount CHOP
    Rear drum brakes are supposed to work better when you are towing.
     
  6. Oct 18, 2012 at 8:25 AM
    #26
    whippersnapper02

    whippersnapper02 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Member:
    #27905
    Messages:
    35,214
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Christian
    Yorba Linda, CA
    Vehicle:
    10 MGM TRD OR 4wd Auto DCSB
    Banks Monster Exhaust, Pop n Lock tailgate lock, Hook-Ups tie down brackets, USA Spec Ipod adaptor, WO seat covers, color matched grill with Grillcraft insert, Tuffy locking bed box
    But the drums will look bad behind my moto bro wheels.:pout:
     
  7. Oct 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM
    #27
    nathan3306

    nathan3306 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Member:
    #83300
    Messages:
    347
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Nathan
    Charleston AFB, SC
    Vehicle:
    2012 SR5 DC 4X4
    http://www.edmunds.com/car-technology/brakes-drum-vs-disc.html

    Disc Brakes
    Though disc brakes rely on the same basic principles to slow a vehicle (friction and heat), their design is far superior to that of drum brakes. Instead of housing the major components within a metal drum, disc brakes use a slim rotor and small caliper to halt wheel movement. Within the caliper are two brake pads, one on each side of the rotor, that clamp together when the brake pedal is pressed. Once again, fluid is used to transfer the movement of the brake pedal into the movement of the brake pads.
    But unlike drum brakes, which allow heat to build up inside the drum during heavy braking, the rotor used in disc brakes is fully exposed to outside air. This exposure works to constantly cool the rotor, greatly reducing its tendency to overheat or cause fading. Not surprisingly, it was under racing circumstances that the weaknesses of drum brakes and the strengths of disc brakes were first illustrated. Racers with disc brake systems could carry their speed "deeper" into a corner and apply greater braking force at the last possible second without overheating the components. Eventually, as with so many other automotive advances, this technology filtered down to the cars driven by everyday people on public roads

    IMO I'm buying a new truck that can tow 8K+ I want to have the latest technology to stop all that weight. For a tacoma, sure it's fine but you are talking about some serious weight being towed by the new half tons.

    Any way shape or form disc brakes are far superior to drum brakes hands down and yes disc brakes look better behind any bro wheels.

    Also, if it is such and awesome idea to have drums why is it that only GM puts this out dated technology on their half tons? I know.... to save the consumer 300 bucks.
     
  8. Oct 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM
    #28
    Fenwick1993

    Fenwick1993 Hillbilly

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Member:
    #85996
    Messages:
    3,255
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Fenwick
    Chesapeake, VA
    Vehicle:
    Stonewall Jackson, '96 Xtracab, rebuilt motor
    Full rebuild short of machine work, mean green motherfucker! Lime green block, hand-polished valve cover, and stickers! Too broke for real mods right now. Stonewall is my baby, but he's also a work truck.
    Used to be a Ford guy all the way, but with their reliability and blowing up issues, they've kinda lost me as a follower. Now I just piddle with my Tacos and my Honda Civic and CRX's.
     
  9. Oct 18, 2012 at 8:24 PM
    #29
    DoorDing

    DoorDing Someone was there .

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2012
    Member:
    #86445
    Messages:
    26,017
    Gender:
    Male
    bee keeper
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB Off-Road 4WD
    Someone banned The Whipper?!? :eek:

    Anyway, I prefer disc brakes because they're easier to maintain and they do offer a real performance advantage. Since the Tacoma relies on e-trickery for traction aids, I can see that disc brakes may offer a benefit there, too. I don't know of any drawbacks to disc brakes for road vehicles, but there may be some I'm unaware of for off road use. I've recently seen posts stating that a change from stock rear drums to discs may not be a good idea.

    As for appearances, I don't care a bit when it comes to something like brakes. If taping Schlitz beer cans to the drums with Mossy Oak tape was proven to make a significant improvement in braking performance, I'd do it right now.
     
  10. Oct 19, 2012 at 1:21 PM
    #30
    nut

    nut she'll ride

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Member:
    #66555
    Messages:
    1,616
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Patrick
    Currently Richmond, VA
    Vehicle:
    Totaled
    TRD SKEWP DCSB 4x4 Silver Mica | URD TCAI/MAF CAL | BHLM | GrillCraft | FF Sliders | LED's All Around | 12v Constant On | EGR In Channel | 15% Tint | Trimmed mud flaps | Fog Light Anytime Mod | Debadged | Tailgate Hoseclamp | DTRL Switch | Disabled Lock Beep/Seatbelt Chime | Husky Liners | HID's | BedRug | WO Seat Covers | ABS Kill Switch | Oil Catch Can | Viper 5704 | Custom Carbon Cabin Filter | Backup Camera Anytime | 400W Anytime | In Cab Outlet W/USB | Firestone Ride Rites | Ams Oil All Around | 32" LED In Lower Grill | BlackVue DR500GW-HD |
    just saw that hahaha
     
  11. Dec 30, 2012 at 3:10 PM
    #31
    Swain

    Swain New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Member:
    #94051
    Messages:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    James
    West by god Virginia
    Vehicle:
    Rock Warrior
    I had my Tundra parked next to my uncles 2500 gmc and my others uncles F250 it was the same size Side by side! Only difference was the tire size they both have 20in compared to my 17in!
     
  12. Jan 24, 2013 at 1:20 PM
    #32
    chart92

    chart92 Hailstate!

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Member:
    #68981
    Messages:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Cody
    McChord AFB, WA
    Vehicle:
    Toyota Corolla S
    I will go Toyota any day of the week. Not hating on Ford; good trucks, but I will always be a Toyota guy. I've got to say I have some power under that right foot with the 5.7 Flex Fuel 4x4. Yes, you read right FLEX. I average about 15-16 in the city when I'm not pedal to the floor cause I hate how people driv in the NW. On the highway I average 18-20 with 33 MT. I'll also say that's running premium octane in it.
     
  13. Jan 24, 2013 at 1:30 PM
    #33
    ATHiker

    ATHiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Member:
    #94758
    Messages:
    336
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tom
    Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    15 Tundra DC 4X4 SR5 OR 5.7L
    The problem with Tundras is the lack of payload. I looked at a Tundra double cab and it only had about 1400 lbs payload. The F250 will have well over 2000 lbs. A F150 with Ecoboost properly equipped can also have over 2000 lbs payload. That may or may not be an issue. It would depend on the tongue weight of the trailers, weight of occupants and other gear being hauled.
     
  14. Jan 24, 2013 at 1:33 PM
    #34
    chart92

    chart92 Hailstate!

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Member:
    #68981
    Messages:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Cody
    McChord AFB, WA
    Vehicle:
    Toyota Corolla S
    Man I shit you not I moved from the Mississippi Gulf Coast to Tacoma, WA (2800mi) pulled 8500Ibs with no problem and only spent $600 using the premium gas. I for one am proud of my Tundra. Couldnt tell you crap about payload only had bout 750Ibs in the back of it with the hard top on it.
     
  15. Jan 24, 2013 at 1:53 PM
    #35
    ATHiker

    ATHiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Member:
    #94758
    Messages:
    336
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tom
    Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    15 Tundra DC 4X4 SR5 OR 5.7L
    i would go with the Tundra if it fits his needs. They have good towing capacity, just very low payload. The low payload is an issue with most 1/2 pickups. Rams have even less.
     
To Top