1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Dropping 100lbs+ off rotational weight.....

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas' started by Razorecko, Nov 5, 2013.

  1. Nov 5, 2013 at 5:49 PM
    #1
    Razorecko

    Razorecko [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18125
    Messages:
    1,434
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 Pyrite DCLB TRD Supercharged
    was going to get rid of the taco for a rapotor but may wait a while as I have a 2nd kiddie on the way. Did though try going another wheel route for acceleration and more importantly mpg.

    Going from duratracs in 285's to 265's = 13 lbs less at each corner
    Going from fj trd wheels to 16" weds hase specs. Fj trd are between 27-29lbs a peice and the hase specs are 15lbs each !

    all added up I will be dropping between 100-108lbs in rotational weigh off the wheel & tire combo !. I've heard every 1lb of rotational weight is equal to 7-9lbs of stationary weight, but than i've heard its equal to only double the stationary weight. Can someone verify the rotational weight conversion ? I'll be losing between 200lbs to 900lbs ?!? in stationary weight so at either range I should def feel and see a difference. I would just like some further info on the rotational weight as I always hated physics.


    ...digging through some racing forums if the rotational conversion rate is at 1lb rotation to 10 stationary when calculated the near 1000lbs off stationary would equate to .8 -1.0 seconds off in the 1/4 mile when racing. That might not be big to stock tacomas but to ones like mine that that are supercharged and have heavy rims and tires that might make a huge difference in performance and mpg..
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2013
  2. Nov 5, 2013 at 6:44 PM
    #2
    92dlxman

    92dlxman drinking whats on sale

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Member:
    #81250
    Messages:
    1,449
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Visalia, CA
    Vehicle:
    08 access 4x4 4.0 6-gear
    5100s, ome884s, wheelers aal kit, and some rustoleum
    I cant help, but im interested!

    your 1k#s of stationary to .8-1.0 rings a bell as I always heard 100#s~ .1 second
     
  3. Nov 5, 2013 at 7:36 PM
    #3
    username

    username Fluffer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Member:
    #44704
    Messages:
    4,268
    Pendleton, Or
    Vehicle:
    05 Taco with some crap welded to it
    mostly stock
    My double bead locks with 37's weigh 147 pounds, per corner. I bet I can still out run you, if I get to pick the road.
     
  4. Nov 5, 2013 at 7:41 PM
    #4
    snowgod06

    snowgod06 UG legend wannabe

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Member:
    #16454
    Messages:
    5,169
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rob
    A farm field, OREGON
    Vehicle:
    06 Access Cab CLONE
    crap bolted and welded together....

    you can beat a lot of people. You dont get any races!! :p
     
  5. Nov 5, 2013 at 8:30 PM
    #5
    Kevinztaco

    Kevinztaco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2012
    Member:
    #92405
    Messages:
    459
    Gender:
    Male
    none yet
    Not much help from this guy but i personally don't want to add unnecessary weights to my tacoma to make it feel like I'm driving a heavy and slow tank. That would defit the whole purpose of me owning a truck. For those guys who built their Tacos for off-roading, I'm sure it is all worth it w/ the extra weights.
     
  6. Nov 5, 2013 at 8:57 PM
    #6
    username

    username Fluffer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Member:
    #44704
    Messages:
    4,268
    Pendleton, Or
    Vehicle:
    05 Taco with some crap welded to it
    mostly stock
    I hear you man. I removed a LOT of weight from my truck to keep that from happening. I would argue that reducing rotational mass has less to do with straight line acceleration than reducing overall mass. Get a lighter battery. Take out your spare tire and all the junk in your rig and it would have more effect than lighter wheels. My turd is just as fast as a stock rig, but it doesn't have a bed, has a gutted interior, and the whole front clip has been removed. The HP to weight ratio is the same...it's just that my weight has a lower CG than yours...;) Hey, I could be wrong. Go run the quarter with your current wheels, then swap them for the new ones and run again.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2013
  7. Nov 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM
    #7
    Razorecko

    Razorecko [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18125
    Messages:
    1,434
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 Pyrite DCLB TRD Supercharged
    could also be because your large tires drastically changed your gearing ;) I'll find out though right away, I've had a few fast cars like currently a 630rwhp cts-v so I can usually feel a legitimate sotp difference...and I'll def be able to see the mpg difference because my mpg sucks...around 11.1-11.5mpg. The thing runs pig rich too - even with a trd cai with a larger filter the highest i've seen a/f hit is like 10.6
     
  8. Nov 5, 2013 at 9:21 PM
    #8
    username

    username Fluffer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Member:
    #44704
    Messages:
    4,268
    Pendleton, Or
    Vehicle:
    05 Taco with some crap welded to it
    mostly stock
    They do run rich in stock trim. I tuned mine to 12.5:1 at WOT above 3000rpms, stock it was at about 10:1. Of course, it should be 14.7:1 at light cruise for good economy, but you already know that. I've also regeared to 4.88's so I'm a tad lower (higher rpms) than a stock rig. Check out URD and get that taco tuned man, they aren't fast even in xrunner trim, but they sure are fun!
     
  9. Nov 5, 2013 at 9:55 PM
    #9
    MetallicTaco

    MetallicTaco Taco Driver Since '07

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2013
    Member:
    #97175
    Messages:
    66
    Gender:
    Male
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    2013 DC SB
    TRD Supercharger Alpine INE-Z928HD, TT Image Dynamics Components, TT 10" sub, JL Audio 4/600, Alpine Front and Rear facing camera lic plates
    Hu?
     
  10. Nov 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM
    #10
    Joe D

    Joe D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Member:
    #66942
    Messages:
    3,103
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joe
    Oxford, Mississippi
    Vehicle:
    Nautical Blue 4Runner Limited 4x4 Model 8668
    I'm not sure of the ratio but there is one. If read 1:2 with 1 be unsprung weight : 2 being sprung weight. Think of rotational weight in practical terms. When you were a kid did you ever grab a rope with weight on the end of it and spin it? Imagine what a 2 foot long rope with a 1 pound sinker would feel like. Now imagine what a 4 foot rope with a 2 pound sinker would feel like. Which rope would be harder to start & stop spinning? So using that basic intupritation you can practically apply that with the overall ratio (rope length) and weight (sinker weight) that acceleration would be affected. But, once it's moving, the effect is not as noticeable.

    There should be an easy force formula on line somewhere for this or maybe one of the sharper tools in the shed will have it on file in the gray matter...
     
  11. Nov 6, 2013 at 3:50 AM
    #11
    Canazes9

    Canazes9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Member:
    #61673
    Messages:
    662
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    David
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    '07 Dbl Cab TRD Sport / '12 Dbl Cab Offroad
  12. Nov 6, 2013 at 8:10 AM
    #12
    tooter

    tooter play every day

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Member:
    #102021
    Messages:
    2,393
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2012, std cab, 5 lug, 2.7, 5 speed
    Built for maximum low end torque, tooter II.VII intake manifold spacer, LCE long tube header, Injen long tube intake, 2,900 rpm torque peak.
    I dropped 60 pounds of rotating weight off my 5 lug by going from 245/75/16 off road tires on heavy 16x7 steel wheels to 235/60/16 road tires on lightweight 16x7 alloy wheels and got a solid 2 mpg gain. :)

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Nov 6, 2013 at 10:58 AM
    #13
    Kurdain

    Kurdain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Member:
    #61809
    Messages:
    180
    Gender:
    Male
    Portland, OR
    I've always heard 1:10 ratio as an average or guesstimate.

    It really boils down to where you loose the weight. Dropping 10 pounds at the crank is going to matter more than at the wheels. It also has different effects, i.e. loosing weight at the flywheel makes the car easier to stall when taking off, but loosing it at the wheel doesn't have such a large effect.
     
  14. Nov 6, 2013 at 11:30 AM
    #14
    Canazes9

    Canazes9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Member:
    #61673
    Messages:
    662
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    David
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    '07 Dbl Cab TRD Sport / '12 Dbl Cab Offroad
    Are you factoring in that you are running significantly shorter tires so your miles covered as indicated by odometer is significantly less than it was w/ the taller tires?

    David
     
  15. Nov 6, 2013 at 1:15 PM
    #15
    tooter

    tooter play every day

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Member:
    #102021
    Messages:
    2,393
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2012, std cab, 5 lug, 2.7, 5 speed
    Built for maximum low end torque, tooter II.VII intake manifold spacer, LCE long tube header, Injen long tube intake, 2,900 rpm torque peak.
    Yes, I did.

    I found an online tire x wheel diameter calculator, and used a 13% correction factor in figuring the mileage with the large diameter off road tires. I sized the aspect ratio of the street tires to within 1% of the original factory stock diameter just so they won't need any correction.
     
  16. Nov 6, 2013 at 1:31 PM
    #16
    WLFFGreg

    WLFFGreg Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Member:
    #105461
    Messages:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Northern NH
    Vehicle:
    TRD Sport
    Bent stock IFS skid
    I don't know about a ratio for rotational vs stationary or unsprung vs sprung, but what I can say is when you reduce rotational mass, a couple things happen. The vehicle will have better acceleration, throttle response, and greater stopping power. I would guess it could also experience better fuel efficiency as less is needed to get you up to speed.

    These modifications are often done by people racing N/A vehicles (or vehicles restricted within' classes looking to get an edge). This type of weight reduction can be experienced through engine pulleys, flywheels, drive shafts, brake rotors, rims, tires and so on.

    Now what you loose is the inertia generated by the heavier rotating objects (consider this stored energy), this inertia helps you maintain cruising speeds and can also help maintain momentum when off-roading at slow speeds over objects. Essentially, your vehicle will be working harder to maintain a set speed. I don't think the extra work exerted equals offsetting the "power" and mpg gains of reducing weight.

    Another thing to keep in mind - light weight pulleys + light weight flywheel can throw knock sensor codes, they essentially help balance out the engine.

    Greg
     
  17. Nov 6, 2013 at 1:38 PM
    #17
    WLFFGreg

    WLFFGreg Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Member:
    #105461
    Messages:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Northern NH
    Vehicle:
    TRD Sport
    Bent stock IFS skid

    I'm confused here - I don't understand tires all that well, but from what I've read on the tire change that you did: you went from a 30.47 inch OD to a 27.1" OD on the tire. @ 60mph indicated, you're actually going 53.4mph - if you drive 5000 miles, your odometer will indicate you actually drove 5617 miles. Did you have your computer reset to the new tire size?

    Greg
     
  18. Nov 6, 2013 at 5:39 PM
    #18
    Razorecko

    Razorecko [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18125
    Messages:
    1,434
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 Pyrite DCLB TRD Supercharged
    I just used a obd meter to plug in my tank size info and activated it after a full fuel fill up.

    -user, yea 12.5 is pretty lean i'm suprised the tacoma takes to it that well. In my fi application if I could i'd be happy with 11.5-11.7.

    60lbs 2mpg - nice. I could be nearing a 5mph gain which in my case now is almost a 30% increase, lol

    And the braking distance was def affected by the heavy wheel setup. I had to switch to cryo treated slotted rotors and better pads when it was time because the abs would trigger way to easily on braking.
     
  19. Nov 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM
    #19
    tooter

    tooter play every day

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Member:
    #102021
    Messages:
    2,393
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2012, std cab, 5 lug, 2.7, 5 speed
    Built for maximum low end torque, tooter II.VII intake manifold spacer, LCE long tube header, Injen long tube intake, 2,900 rpm torque peak.
    So am I. How can you be Greg when I'm Greg? ;)

    You're correct on the numbers.

    My speedometer and odometer were not accurate with the larger off road tires and larger rims, and I didn't do anything mechanical or electronic to correct them. Instead, I used a 13% correction factor on paper when calculating my gas mileage to account for the difference in indicated miles travelled from the actual miles travelled.

    When I went to smaller diameter road tires and alloy wheels, I sized the tires (235/60/16) to get as close as I could back to the factory 5 lug stock 215/70/15 tire and wheel diameter which returned the accuracy to my speedometer and odometer.

    Greg
     
  20. Nov 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM
    #20
    Razorecko

    Razorecko [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18125
    Messages:
    1,434
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 Pyrite DCLB TRD Supercharged
    Got new wheels & tires on. Def a large difference, sotp says 1lb rotational is prob near 10lbs weighted. How can I tell ? I had the new tires & rims in the truck on the way the way there and it felt pretty sluggish in terms of power delivery. On the way back from the dealership the car felt alot snappier in response and power with the old tires and rims in the truck. Can't wait to unload the 250+lbs of old gear and give the tires a few miles to break in and really rip into it.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2013
To Top