1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Is the 2.7 4X4 auto a "dog"?

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by Cabin Fever, Jul 1, 2013.

  1. Jul 1, 2013 at 9:35 AM
    #1
    Cabin Fever

    Cabin Fever [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Member:
    #49694
    Messages:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brian
    Orange, VA
    I've always wanted to ask this and don't know why I never did before. Anyway, gas mileage is a big deal to me and since I need a 4X4 pickup for our winters, it only makes sense to look at the 2.7 4X4 Tacoma. I don't hate driving a stick, but I prefer an automatic so that's the direction I'm going in. With that said, is the 2.7 4X4 auto a decent truck power wise or does it drive like a dog with the automatic? Obviously I'm not looking for V6 power out of the 2.7, but I would like to know if it's as miserable to drive as my 2.3 Ranger. Any advice would really be appreciated folks.

    BTW, I'm looking into the 2001-2004 model years if that makes a difference.
     
  2. Jul 1, 2013 at 9:40 AM
    #2
    kirkofwimbo

    kirkofwimbo Say no to Bro

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2010
    Member:
    #40338
    Messages:
    1,769
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Clayton
    Wimberley, TX
    Vehicle:
    '07 DCSB SR5 4x4
    It's got LSD man.....
    The only way to truly get an answer is to test drive one. You will get answers on both sides of that argument here. It would be safe to assume however, that it would not be as much of a dog as a 2.3 Ranger danger :)
     
  3. Jul 1, 2013 at 9:43 AM
    #3
    Blueitrgsr

    Blueitrgsr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Member:
    #60495
    Messages:
    1,476
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brad
    Gainesville, Fl
    Vehicle:
    2006 Reg Cab 4wd
    Some bilsteins, OME 885's, and an AAL.
    My 5speed isn't that bad. I'm not winning any races but its gets me around just fine. My only issues is heading up into the mountains it's sluggish. But I can't speak for the auto. I live my 4cyl.
     
  4. Jul 1, 2013 at 12:55 PM
    #4
    jethro

    jethro Master Baiter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Member:
    #21734
    Messages:
    1,002
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Geoff
    Southern NH
    Vehicle:
    13 Access 4x4 TRD Offroad
    Empty gas tank mod
    I've been driving a 2.7l 4-cyl extra cab for 10 years now. Bought it in 2004. Mine is an SR5, auto, with 265/70/16's. It's a big 4 cyl, and actually not horrible. Don't expect to be racing people in it off the line! But it's actually quite capable. The only time it's really an issue is if you tow for any distance. I snowmobile up here in the Northeast, so even pulling a one place trailer with my sled, gear in the bed of the truck, it's doggy on the hills. You'll be winding that thing out. Even when it's not loaded, you'll hear the auto tranny working hard on the big hills.

    Mind you, I have pulled a big two place enclosed snowmobile trailer loaded with two machines before- it can be done.
     
  5. Jul 1, 2013 at 1:25 PM
    #5
    Cabin Fever

    Cabin Fever [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Member:
    #49694
    Messages:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brian
    Orange, VA
    Thanks for the input so far fellas. The reason I haven't just gone and test drove one is because 4 banger 4X4 Tacos don't pop up for sale too often around here except for 5-speeds. If anything I'll probably have to look out of state for one in an automatic. Seems people just don't want to get rid of the damn things. :D
     
  6. Jul 1, 2013 at 1:44 PM
    #6
    ryanjboutin

    ryanjboutin Mob dirt parking lots.

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Member:
    #14489
    Messages:
    19,628
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ryan
    Las Vegas
    Vehicle:
    2013 4x4 Off Road, 6 speed.
    Spacers. Spacers everywhere.
    He's looking for a first gen with a 3RZ, not a second gen with a 2TR engine.
     
  7. Jul 1, 2013 at 8:17 PM
    #7
    Rackster

    Rackster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Member:
    #78628
    Messages:
    381
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Connecticut
    Vehicle:
    '04 E/cab 4x4 2.7 Auto SR5
    4 cylinder autos are even more difficult to find. You may have to cast a wide net in the auto search tools to find the one for you.

    I owned a 2000 Ranger 2.5 auto for 12 years - great little truck. Performance wise, there are pluses and minuses for each. Ranger is better on FE, worse on power/acceleration. 4x4 Tacoma sits up higher, especially over my RWD Ranger. Neither truck will win many races, but both were appropriately geared to get you off the line and into traffic safely and without many sneers. Personally, I find my Tacoma more fun to drive and I like the styling better. FE wise though, the 4 cylinder Rangers are better performers. If you make the leap, you won't be disappointed. Just be careful on the Tacoma you buy: make sure if it's an older, Gen 1 that the frame has been undercoated by Toyota and under warranty. My 2004 is warranteed until 2018 and was a key buying factor when I picked mine up about a year ago. Good luck on the hunt!!
     
  8. Jul 1, 2013 at 8:21 PM
    #8
    Who Dat Popcorn

    Who Dat Popcorn Dafuq

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Member:
    #4992
    Messages:
    1,470
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ricky
    Richmond, VA
    Vehicle:
    Sold :/
    SOLD
    I think paired with the auto, it is a dog. (at least I feel like mine is, lol)

    I've heard the manual is much better.
     
  9. Jul 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM
    #9
    tJc

    tJc Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2012
    Member:
    #86778
    Messages:
    38
    Gender:
    Male
    New Jersey
    Vehicle:
    '12 2.7l 4x4 Regular Cab
    Magnaflow Exhaust, Bullbar, Tonneau cover, Tint, TRD shift knob & Exhaust tip
    It's better than I expected... Coming from a Mustang, I was concerned about some of the online acceleration feedback, but after ten months, I have had no problems with it. The only time I notice a real limitation was with a fully loaded bed, straight into a head wind. Couldn't top 80mph except when heading downhill. The 65-70mph window seems to be the sweet cruising spot. If you have a lot of mountain/steep hill driving, you might take some pause, otherwise go for a test drive and see how you like it. (BTW, much better than the Ranger's slushbox!)
     
  10. Jul 3, 2013 at 9:11 PM
    #10
    somethinboutayota

    somethinboutayota Dorthy left Kansas for a reason

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Member:
    #101146
    Messages:
    4,299
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Parker
    Dodge City, Kansas
    Vehicle:
    Go to get alignment- replace whole front end
    Debadged and painted, plasti-dip bumper , Sock monkey decals, tool box, K&N cold air intake, flag holder/fishing pole holder, Satoshi, magnaflow 40 series, spidertrax wheel spacers, map lights, led reverse lights, led dash assembly lights, roof top LED bar
    My cousin has a single cab with the 2.7 in it and hates it, he loves the gas mileage but he says when he tries to pass on the highway it takes forever for it to speed up here is a pic of his truck

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 AM
    #11
    tan4x4

    tan4x4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2011
    Member:
    #67982
    Messages:
    1,978
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rick
    Folsom, CA
    Vehicle:
    99 Tacoma EC 4x4 2.7L Auto
    Bilsteins, OME 881's, 3-leaf AAL, Detroit TruTrac, 31" tires, Michelin LTX AT2, stock gears, Tranny skidplate, TC skidplate, CBI rear bumper, sliders, UltraGauge, PowerTank, CB
    I'm not into head-snapping HP but I'm happy with mine. Its a race car compared to my '84 carbureted 4runner that had 96hp :D

    I can pass trucks on the highway with no problem. My drive train is all stock, except for the limited slip unit. It bogs down on the hills, but I just down shift to maintain speed. I think it helps me a bit to have manual hubs (the front diff, front axles and front driveshaft do NOT turn while in 2wd). 01-04 Tacomas were not available with manual hubs, though.

    MPG varies from 19 to 25, depending on conditions. Not great, but acceptable for a heavy 4x4 extended cab.

    Any reason why you have to have a truck? A Subaru is a good AWD winter vehicle that would likely get better gas mileage, and be more comfortable.
     
  12. Jul 5, 2013 at 8:34 AM
    #12
    kryten

    kryten Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Member:
    #18813
    Messages:
    1,406
    Gender:
    Male
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Sport
    Slightly off topic. Did anyone had a chance to drive 4.2 V6 F150 and a 2.7 4x4 Tacoma? How would they compare? Reason I ask is:

    I used to have '98 F150 Supercab 2wd, 4.2L V6, 5spd manual and it was really slow. I had to downshift lots on almost any hill but it got me around even loaded to the max payload on almost all summer weekends. I never towed anything.

    I owned it before I bought my Tacoma. The plan was to get '05+ Tacoma AccessCab 4x4 5spd to replace it, but somehow I ended up with my V6 DCSB 6MT instead. Just curious if I would have had the same issues if I have went with the 4 cylinder Taco. I never had a chance to test drive one. Would the 2.7 4x4 Tacoma feel more powerful than tha 4.2 F150?
     
  13. Jul 19, 2013 at 8:11 PM
    #13
    PattonT

    PattonT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2013
    Member:
    #108260
    Messages:
    50
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2013 2.7l prerunner
    When I sold cars I drove a 99 4.2liter 5spd 4wd f150 (unknown axle gears) for a demo. I actually thought it was a great truck. Power wise it may have had more pep than my 2004 Regular cab 2.7 prerunner.
     
  14. Jul 19, 2013 at 9:50 PM
    #14
    KevinButler35

    KevinButler35 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Member:
    #90616
    Messages:
    30
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    tacoma
    Led Dash lights Chrome Roll Bar 2.5'' Lift Kit HID RetroFit Ultra Gauge
    No, the 2.7 isn't really powerful compared to the 4.2. My dad has a 2001 f150 with the 4.2 in it, and it definitely has more power than the 2.7
     
  15. Jul 19, 2013 at 10:33 PM
    #15
    Rich91710

    Rich91710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2012
    Member:
    #73470
    Messages:
    16,477
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rich
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    08 Base
    Satoshi with FJ badge, factory cruise, factory intermittent wipers, Redline Tuning hood-lift struts, Hellwig Swaybar, Rosen DVD-Nav
    Well ya... put oversized tires on a 2.7 without regearing and it IS going to be a dog.

    Worst thing I ever did to my '94 with the 22RE was put 31's on it. Had to have it on the floor to maintain 75 up a very gentle grade. Had to downshift to maintain 55 up a decent grade, and if someone cut me off and I had to take my foot off the gas, I would never recover.

    The 2nd Gen 2.7 is adequate. It's a good engine in a good truck. It's not a powerhouse, but it's better than a LOT of other vehicles on the road.
     
  16. Jul 19, 2013 at 10:50 PM
    #16
    kryten

    kryten Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Member:
    #18813
    Messages:
    1,406
    Gender:
    Male
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Sport
    Hmm, interesting. Mine was 5spd 2wd with 3.55 gears and it was enough to get by and get the job done, but I don't think I would be ok with a truck with less power than that. Maybe the 2.7 is not for me after all.
     
  17. Jul 20, 2013 at 3:43 AM
    #17
    tooter

    tooter play every day

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Member:
    #102021
    Messages:
    2,391
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2012, std cab, 5 lug, 2.7, 5 speed
    Built for maximum low end torque, tooter II.VII intake manifold spacer, LCE long tube header, Injen long tube intake, 2,900 rpm torque peak.
    You are so right.
    When I took the oversized 245/75/16's off of my 5 speed 3.31 rear end geared 2x4, and installed stock diameter 235/60/16's, the difference was night and day...

    [​IMG]

    The 2.7 is a good little engine... but doesn't do very well when taken outside of its stock operating parameters.
     
  18. Jul 30, 2013 at 7:52 AM
    #18
    FTD

    FTD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2013
    Member:
    #107234
    Messages:
    314
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't know about the Taco, but my dad and I had identical 1996 Nissans - his auto, mine stick. No contest, the auto sucked.

    Now I've got a new Taco, 2.7, stick, and while it's not a Tesla*, it has a LOT more kick than my Nissan ever did. I'm willing to bet that a 2nd gen Taco automatic is just fine. An older one I would surely want to drive first.

    *drove a Tesla yesterday for the first time. Dear God. I've driven 911s and Vettes and neither one, no matter how tricked, has acceleration or handling like that Tesla. You could get into a lot of trouble in that car. I could buy 8 of my version of the Taco for what the top of the line costs, but damn...it might be worth it.
     
  19. Jul 30, 2013 at 4:06 PM
    #19
    13Greysled

    13Greysled Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2013
    Member:
    #99255
    Messages:
    308
    Gender:
    Male
    WA
    Vehicle:
    13' Taco
    Tint
    Gets me to and from where I need to go, maybe not quick, but it does the job. Only real issue I have is steep hills, but on flat its not too bad.
     
  20. Jul 30, 2013 at 6:15 PM
    #20
    vtmactech

    vtmactech Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Member:
    #28192
    Messages:
    160
    Gender:
    Male
    KS
    Vehicle:
    '11 Reg Cab 4cyl 4x4 MGM
    ...
    My 2.7 4x4 Auto is great as far as I'm concerned. I needed to get an automatic because of an injury while in the Army but I have not been disappointed. I went with more aggressive tire tread but kept them factory size, so only had to deal with additional weight of the tires themselves.

    I recently installed a RTT which stands fully above the cab but even the wind resistance created hasn't been an issue at interstate speeds.

    Only issue has been when loaded, going up a steep hill and into a head wind.

    I just received LCE headers and may consider one of Tooters spacers if/when they are available. I am also giving serious consideration to the URD SC kit. Have the money set aside and just got a copy of the install instructions. Only concern is voiding my factory warranty. Want to make sure I can uninstall it quickly if warranty service is needed.

    [​IMG]
     
To Top