1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Nikon lense recommendation

Discussion in 'Photography' started by jcka, Jul 5, 2012.

  1. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:02 PM
    #1
    jcka

    jcka [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Member:
    #46421
    Messages:
    30
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Orange, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Tacoma
    Seeking info for a lense for my D80. If I had to have one lense, what would it be? Something that is all purpose...
     
  2. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:08 PM
    #2
    Bennett707

    Bennett707 Yeti Hunter

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Member:
    #77793
    Messages:
    10,861
    Gender:
    Male
    Oregon
    Vehicle:
    '04 V6 3.4 TRD
    zip ties and scotch tape (duct tape is too expensive)
    55-200mm VR imo
     
  3. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:20 PM
    #3
    NetDep

    NetDep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Member:
    #59233
    Messages:
    552
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tim
    Bellevue, WA
    Vehicle:
    2011 Toyota Tacoma Off Road MGM
    This is a very tough issue. Kind of like a one gun or favorite food. So much depends on what it is you like to shoot - I always say let your needs drive your gear and not just get gear for the sake of gear - or a great deal - or because your buddy shoots one and it's cool. That said - I tend to shoot larger mammals and really like larger birds in flight (we have a great winter eagle season here) and my goto lens (I am a Canon shooter but Nikon has one as well) is a 70-200 f/2.8. This lense rarely comes off my camera - it is fast and has a very verstile focal range. It also takes a teleconverter which still gives you a constant f/4.

    If price is no - or little - object that is a great all around lens. You can do decent sports, model and a lot of animal shooting with it. Not sure if you are familiar with it - but for Nikon shooters - this is a good resource: (he does have some ego and not all like him but there is some good info)

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/

    The lens mentioned:

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70-200mm-ii.htm

    Sorry if I missed the boat - but you kind of left it open ended. Just remember - like so many say - "bodies come and go - glass is forever" - buy the best lens you can afford - you will change bodies far more than good glass and it is cheaper to buy once now than three times later -- I have done all of that - and have some of the junk in junk drawers to prove it!!

    Happy snapping!!!!
     
  4. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:28 PM
    #4
    cmack

    cmack Impeach Chris4x4!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18119
    Messages:
    5,368
    Gender:
    Male
    Depends on what you wanna use it for. If it's just random pics, and no serious photography, I'd say pick yourself up an 18-55mm and a 55-200mm. Both are affordable, and you probably already have the 18-55mm. Should cover your general needs with having an ability for a wide range.
     
  5. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:34 PM
    #5
    6spd

    6spd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Member:
    #72162
    Messages:
    816
    Gender:
    Male
    san diego
    Vehicle:
    2012 4x4
    Do you know what range you like? If short and wide, tamron 17-50mm 2.8, if a little longer I'd suggest a sigma 24-70mm. I cant recommend anything longer that isnt inexpensive.

    Im under the impression that you are on a budget, correct?
     
  6. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:35 PM
    #6
    l1tech

    l1tech Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Member:
    #58405
    Messages:
    118
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    mike
    bend,oregon
    Vehicle:
    2011 TRD Sport
    3" Redilift
    The 18-200VR or VRll is the perfect all around lense. Great for most all shots. A little pricey , but worth it.
     
  7. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:44 PM
    #7
    MrGrimm

    MrGrimm Mall Crawler

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Member:
    #24568
    Messages:
    2,555
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dean
    Slaying bodies abroad
    Vehicle:
    2006 Toyota Tacoma 4WD w/TRD Sport Package
    See build page
    For the beginner wanting some great pictures, look at 50mm 1.8. For your everyday average lens, an 18-200 is a great choice. A lot (including myself) of guys that bought a body with this kit lens often sell this lens for a good price. If money is no object, then a Nikon 24-70 would be ideal. Then again, it all depends on what kind of shooting you do.
     
  8. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:49 PM
    #8
    jcka

    jcka [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Member:
    #46421
    Messages:
    30
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Orange, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Tacoma
    Thanks everyone, I appreciate the quick responses. To clarify, I have the two lenses the camera came with (a kit with 18-55 and 55-200). They seem to be basic lenses.

    I'm getting ready to go on a road trip to Yellowstone and hope to find a lense I can use for great scenery and wildlife shots as well as the customary family shots.

    I'm new to photography and am learning as I go. I'm willing to spend enough for a great lense that will last a long time, but not willing to spend an arm and a leg.
     
  9. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:51 PM
    #9
    offroadwonder

    offroadwonder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Member:
    #75774
    Messages:
    192
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jared
    Aurora, CO
    Vehicle:
    '10 Tacoma DCSB 4x4 TRD Off-Road
    Chopped mud-flaps (yup, I'm hardcore)
    Lest we forget the fixed lenses. My favorite lens is my 35mm f/1.8. It was relatively cheap so I'm not afraid to use it, it is fast enough to avoid a lot of flash situations, and it is light.

    Of course you have to be willing to move around a lot more when you aren't using a zoom lens. But it makes you very conscious of your framing.

    But as others have said, it comes down to what you like to shoot. A fixed lens would be a terrible choice for the kind of use that NetDep was describing.
     
  10. Jul 5, 2012 at 9:51 PM
    #10
    cmack

    cmack Impeach Chris4x4!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18119
    Messages:
    5,368
    Gender:
    Male
    Nifty 50 (50mm f1.8)

    or 35mm f1.8

    I personally LOVE my 35mm

    They are both prime lenses, meaning that you can't zoom, it's fixed.

    Honestly, you're best to learn the current lenses you have. It comes down to the person behind the viewfinder, so you CAN do a lot with the lenses you've got, even though they seem basic.
     
  11. Jul 5, 2012 at 10:05 PM
    #11
    jcka

    jcka [OP] Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Member:
    #46421
    Messages:
    30
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    Orange, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Tacoma
    Very true...

     
  12. Jul 5, 2012 at 10:08 PM
    #12
    cmack

    cmack Impeach Chris4x4!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18119
    Messages:
    5,368
    Gender:
    Male
    Case and point, I shot this last night with just the kit 18-55mm lens in shutter priority mode.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Jul 5, 2012 at 10:12 PM
    #13
    cmack

    cmack Impeach Chris4x4!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18119
    Messages:
    5,368
    Gender:
    Male
    And these wit han 18-55mm lens also...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    Best thing you can do, learn the camera and the lenses, and also the compositional elements will help enhance your shots. I think you're fine with the lenses you have as far as having a range of ability. That 35mm and 50mm are both excellent lenses so if you do end up picking them up, it will be good to have, but not necessary at this point in time. Just my two cents.
     
  14. Jul 6, 2012 at 1:21 AM
    #14
    6spd

    6spd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Member:
    #72162
    Messages:
    816
    Gender:
    Male
    san diego
    Vehicle:
    2012 4x4
    This is probably the best advice you can take to heart. learn how to use what you have, and understand what the functions do on your camera. Most people fall into the "I need better stuff than my kit lens!" attitude when they make the initial purchase.

    Learn how to use your gear before you upgrade, pretty sure that goes without saying for most things. :eek: I would recommend at least a tripod if you are planning on doing some landscape stills.
     
  15. Jul 13, 2012 at 11:58 AM
    #15
    The Traveler

    The Traveler REBELTACO

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Member:
    #75806
    Messages:
    6,790
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    '10 Long Travel 4x4 DCSB
    Total Chaos 3.5" LT kit, King remote resi 8x2.5 coilovers, Glassworks Unlimited fiberglass fenders and bedsides, Icon resi rears, All Pro Expo leaf pack, Wheeler's super bumps, drop in AFE Pro Dry-S, Aero-Turbine 2525XL Muffler, Spidertrax, Rigid Industries Dually Amber Floods, rock lights, Strobe amber/white dust lights, bushwhacker fender flares, CB and HAM radios, Pelfreybilt Off Road front three hoop bumper, All-Pro APEX kickout sliders, CBI Trail Rider rear bumper, Tres Tacos LED rock lights, 50" LED Light Bar,
    I got both of those lenses with my D3000 kit. I used them for 2 years, just learning my camera, and composition.

    I primarily shoot landscapes, scenery, and national parks...things of that sort, etc. My favorite lens that I use with this camera for that type of thing is my DX 10.5mm F/2.8 Fisheye. I use Imagetrends PS plugin for rectilinear correction (fixing the fisheye look without losing the wide angle). Only drawback with this lens is that it does not have an autofocus motor, The camera body you're using must have the AF motor otherwise it's manual focus only...which I really don't mind.

    http://www.nikonusa.com/Nikon-Produ.../AF-DX-Fisheye-Nikkor-10.5mm-f%2F2.8G-ED.html

    [​IMG]

    Here is a few examples without using the rectilinear correction. All shot with my $500 Nikon D3000. Really shows you the power of this lens.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Hope this helps.
     
  16. Jan 14, 2013 at 3:35 PM
    #16
    Krazie Sj

    Krazie Sj Resident Jackass

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Member:
    #9849
    Messages:
    13,500
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Power Serge
    LV-426 (Acheron)
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Off Road 4x4
    Borla Catback Exhaust, Airaid Short Ram Intake, 285x75R16 Mickey Thompson MTZs, 16" Konig Countersteer rims, ARB Bumper, All Pro LT w/Walker Evan Shocks front and back, All Pro expedition leaf pack, 10,000lb Superwinch, Intake Manifold Spacer, Bed Rack with ARB RTT, Rotopack and Hi Lift mounted, Husky Liner mats and an air freshener from 1995.
    I generally dislike pictures taken with fisheye lenses cause 98.5% of them are teenagers taking skate boarding pictures.

    But you sir...you have changed my opinion.
     
  17. Jan 31, 2013 at 7:02 AM
    #17
    medic2230

    medic2230 Ditch Doctor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Member:
    #9942
    Messages:
    10,737
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Murph
    Columbus, Ga
    Vehicle:
    2011 Taco 4x4 DCLB
    20% Tint, OME 3"complete lift with Dakar's, Light Racing UCA's, 285/75/16 Nitto Terra Grapplers, 10 HP TW sticker, Ultraguage, B.A.M.F. Rock Sliders, MedicFab Bed Rack, Relentless front bumper
    You have an excellent eye for composition sir! I'm amazed how many people will try to tell people that they don't need a fisheye and it won't get used much at all and they are only wasting their money. I've wanted one since my first 35mm camera in 1983, a Nikon FG.

    I do have a question about the picture with the Taco in it. Did you use a polarizer on the fisheye? If so, did you hand hold it in front of the lens or is this a HDR and that made the clouds stand out like that? I know most fisheyes won't accept filters because of the curvature of the front glass.
     
  18. Jan 31, 2013 at 9:59 AM
    #18
    THXEY

    THXEY Panda Jerk

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Member:
    #11614
    Messages:
    13,394
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jacob
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    2013 Subaru WRX
    STi Short Shifter.OEM floor illumination kit. Rally Armor Mud Flaps. BC BR Coilovers. Invidia N1 Exhaust
    This is one lens i WOULDNT recommend. Yes its a cool lens. Definitely not what you're looking for. This lens will get old really quick, every person i know that bought a fisheye, used it a LOT for like 5-6 months, then never touched it again. If you want a fisheye just get the cheap-o Opteka one, it's an 8mm manual focus FE. Its so wide that you nail the focus every time if youre shooting past f/4. Besides for the most part, fisheye is just a novelty, there seldom are photos that you can't take with a wide-angle that were shot with a fisheye.

    With that being said, look for a mid-range lens. I would go for a zoom, at least for what you're asking. 17-55 f/2.8 is amazing and exactly what you're looking for. But it's definitely a pretty penny.

    Check out this lens.
    http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Pr...2207/AF-S-NIKKOR-18-35mm-f%2F3.5-4.5G-ED.html
     
  19. Jan 31, 2013 at 10:04 AM
    #19
    6spd

    6spd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Member:
    #72162
    Messages:
    816
    Gender:
    Male
    san diego
    Vehicle:
    2012 4x4
    no one has mentioned the tamron 17-50mm 2.8? that has my vote. $300-350 on craigslist
     
  20. Mar 1, 2013 at 5:40 PM
    #20
    Xer0 SiN

    Xer0 SiN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Member:
    #33334
    Messages:
    793
    Gender:
    Male
    Hilo, HI
    Vehicle:
    13 TRD OR 4wd, 6spd
    this and that...
    if you have a crop body camera, in my case d7000, you really cannot go wrong with the 35 f1.8. its very affordable and takes super sharp pics. i just picked the 17-55 f2.8. didnt really get a chance to play with it yet cause im waiting on my filters. but so far, the lens is everything that everyone one hyped it up to be. an excellent lens. next up, the beast 70-200 f2.8 vrII >=).
     
To Top