1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

power delivery

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by Taco280AI, Aug 23, 2015.

  1. Aug 23, 2015 at 6:25 PM
    #1
    Taco280AI

    Taco280AI [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2015
    Member:
    #161870
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    COS
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD OR DCSB 4x4
    So it makes more peak hp, but how does it make it getting there? Curious to see a dyno and what it makes between 1800-2500.
     
  2. Aug 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM
    #2
    Taco280AI

    Taco280AI [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2015
    Member:
    #161870
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    COS
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD OR DCSB 4x4
    Usually. But the more powerful Tacoma would have less useful power.
     
  3. Aug 23, 2015 at 6:33 PM
    #3
    TacoJonn

    TacoJonn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2013
    Member:
    #118681
    Messages:
    3,867
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jon
    Laramie, Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    '13 DCLB Sport 4x4, '78 FJ40
    Supposedly the engine was designed to bring the torque in low in the rev band. Contrary to a lot of threads on this forum this 3.5 liter V6 was designed from the ground up for the Tacoma. In fact a few reviewers have said the engine feels like the old 4.0 but when you really need to get some power, you have some extra juice higher in the rev band for passing etc. Hard to get a good gauge on the engines from people invited to these posh events by Toyota. Will be interesting to see some real reviews from some forum members here.
     
  4. Aug 23, 2015 at 6:34 PM
    #4
    TacoJonn

    TacoJonn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2013
    Member:
    #118681
    Messages:
    3,867
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jon
    Laramie, Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    '13 DCLB Sport 4x4, '78 FJ40
    Also remember the near rear end differential. More torque is getting to the rear wheels than the gen 2.
     
  5. Aug 23, 2015 at 8:41 PM
    #5
    Z50king

    Z50king DCLBOR4X4FTW

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2015
    Member:
    #157056
    Messages:
    8,419
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eric
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    2016 DCLB Off Road 4x4 Super White
    Stock and loving it
  6. Aug 23, 2015 at 8:46 PM
    #6
    jonnyozero3

    jonnyozero3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Member:
    #146402
    Messages:
    830
    Dry places
    Vehicle:
    '99 TRD OR V6 M/T
    OME, sliders, dents, hail damage, soiled armrest. Lightbulbs.
    Can you elaborate? Is this a gearing difference or did they reduce driveline losses? Or something else?
     
  7. Aug 24, 2015 at 7:54 AM
    #7
    TacoJonn

    TacoJonn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2013
    Member:
    #118681
    Messages:
    3,867
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jon
    Laramie, Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    '13 DCLB Sport 4x4, '78 FJ40
    Yes, they changed the axle ratio on the rear. This will allow more torque to get to rear wheels with less engine output. The 1 less lb ft of torque from the engine doesn't tell the full story.
     
    jonnyozero3[QUOTED] likes this.
  8. Aug 24, 2015 at 7:57 AM
    #8
    Justus

    Justus fucks not given

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Member:
    #94417
    Messages:
    9,230
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Nabisco the kid
    In ur toolbox
    Vehicle:
    not so low, not so slow 2006 6 lug
    stockish
    So its like a geared s2000?
     
  9. Aug 24, 2015 at 8:43 AM
    #9
    SharkyPR

    SharkyPR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2015
    Member:
    #160048
    Messages:
    55
    Gender:
    Male
    Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2009 Civic Si
    All bolt ons + tuning solution. Capable of running high 13's.
    3.909 (16' Tacoma A/T)
    3.73 (15' Tacoma A/T)

    Toyota did the right thing with this power train. That increase in the final drive ratio will help the lack of low end torque a lot and will make the high end way more stronger.
    I spec that the performance is in the low 15's in the quarter mile for a fully loaded tacoma.
     
  10. Aug 24, 2015 at 9:03 AM
    #10
    jonnyozero3

    jonnyozero3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Member:
    #146402
    Messages:
    830
    Dry places
    Vehicle:
    '99 TRD OR V6 M/T
    OME, sliders, dents, hail damage, soiled armrest. Lightbulbs.
    Since the 16' Tacoma M/T is a 4.30 rear vs the A/T 3.909, does that mean (a) the M/T will feel stronger and/or (b) dyno with more horsies at the wheels?

    I am not a smart man, thanks for helping explain this.
     
  11. Aug 24, 2015 at 9:47 AM
    #11
    SharkyPR

    SharkyPR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2015
    Member:
    #160048
    Messages:
    55
    Gender:
    Male
    Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2009 Civic Si
    All bolt ons + tuning solution. Capable of running high 13's.
    The manual one should be more faster at the expense of less fuel economy.
     
  12. Aug 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM
    #12
    DirtEater

    DirtEater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Member:
    #98954
    Messages:
    523
    Gender:
    Male
    Surprise, AZ
    Not necessarily. Each transmission's gear ratios also have to be considered. There's most likely a reason they have different axle ratios for the manual and the automatic.
     
  13. Aug 24, 2015 at 11:06 AM
    #13
    SharkyPR

    SharkyPR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2015
    Member:
    #160048
    Messages:
    55
    Gender:
    Male
    Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2009 Civic Si
    All bolt ons + tuning solution. Capable of running high 13's.
  14. Aug 24, 2015 at 11:15 AM
    #14
    jonnyozero3

    jonnyozero3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Member:
    #146402
    Messages:
    830
    Dry places
    Vehicle:
    '99 TRD OR V6 M/T
    OME, sliders, dents, hail damage, soiled armrest. Lightbulbs.
    So using Tubesock's nicely done data comp...this implies the MT pushes more torque to the wheels in 1st/2nd, less in the 3rd, then more in 4th/5th/6th?

    And this "increase" in the wheel torque is merely due to the difference in RPM the engine is operating? Am I understanding this correctly?
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2015
  15. Aug 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM
    #15
    jonnyozero3

    jonnyozero3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Member:
    #146402
    Messages:
    830
    Dry places
    Vehicle:
    '99 TRD OR V6 M/T
    OME, sliders, dents, hail damage, soiled armrest. Lightbulbs.
    Oops, I did an edit while you were typing, just FYI.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top