1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Rear Disc's

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by Streaking10 Taco, Oct 18, 2012.

  1. Oct 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM
    #21
    jberry813

    jberry813 The Mad Scientist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    13,948
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    Resurrected LT TRD S/C 4x4
    TRD Supercharger, URD 7th Injector Kit, Total Chaos LT, King Coilov....too much shit to list.
    Just to play devil's advocate...next time you see a parked semi truck, take a look at the brakes it has, both truck and trailer.
     
  2. Oct 19, 2012 at 9:31 AM
    #22
    The Phoenix

    The Phoenix Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Member:
    #89306
    Messages:
    22
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rocky
    Vehicle:
    Tonka
    Marketing gets a bit weird in some situations, like paying a premium for superior performance. The lower end model may be equipped with the more expensive hardware just so you have to change up to the high end to get the perceived advantage (real or not). Marketing is all about manipulating the customer into giving you more money for less product. As I mentioned, in car and SUV applications where the rear load is consistent, rear disks do make sense, since they can be sized appropriately for the consistent load. Its with the swinging load, where a pickup can have a load on the rear swing by 1500-2000 pounds or more depending on whether it is empty or loaded to capacity. Some models of Tacoma have a 1500 pound payload capacity, and given that the majority of its 4000 pound curb weight is sitting on the front, that probably represents at or near two times the empty load on the rear axle, which means that you can apply a lot more braking force before it locks up.

    Yes, most of the stopping power is from the front, but when you've got most of your weight sitting over the rear axle, you'd be surprised just how much stopping the back can do.

    I've *owned* a pickup with rear disks and a MAJOR rear disk rusting problem. The rear disks had to be replaced on it every single year I owned it because it would develop massive bands of heavy rust. Before that truck, my previous had drums in the rear. 250,000 km and only ONE change of shoes. No other work done (just occasional checkups) on the rear brakes.

    Not knowing where you call home, the rear disk rust problem may or may not be an issue there. The salt belts certainly experience this.

    That is, in fact, what you're starting to see. There are a few places where drums are installed as an intentional downgrade feature (among other downgrades and/or lack of upgrades) in order to push people into the premium model or upgraded package.

    As far as Manufacturing expense goes, it is very easy to show that disks are cheaper to manufacture than drums. Just count all the parts! There is more material (steel is not cheap) on a drum than a disk, the machine required for cutting a drum surface is more complex and expensive. Even the physical shape of a drum is more complex to manufacture than a disk, most of which can just be cut out of a sheet. Both include a hydraulic slave cylinder with rubber seals and pistons, but there are a pile of springs and levers in the drum that aren't present in a disk.

    So there you have it. Two kinds of brakes, both are good brakes, both have advantages and disadvantages. The key is to use it in the place where it is best suited. Sometimes, the wrong one goes into a place, just because there are so many people who have this unfounded impression that one is better than the other. Yes, disk brakes are better than drums, however, only in the specific applications where they actually are.
     
  3. Oct 19, 2012 at 9:35 AM
    #23
    The Phoenix

    The Phoenix Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Member:
    #89306
    Messages:
    22
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rocky
    Vehicle:
    Tonka
    Be aware that this discussion is about rear brakes on Tacomas (and/or pickups in general), not race cars, cranes, or the space shuttle. As such, you have done an admirable job of emulating the news media and taken my quote FAR out of context.
     
  4. Oct 19, 2012 at 9:39 AM
    #24
    The Phoenix

    The Phoenix Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Member:
    #89306
    Messages:
    22
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Rocky
    Vehicle:
    Tonka
    Also, this should be considered with respect to my statements regarding wild variations in load. In the case of a semi, that could be as much as 80,000 pounds distributed across 4 axles -- two on the rear of the tractor, two on the rear of the trailer.


    Hey wait... did you just call me the devil?
     
  5. Oct 19, 2012 at 9:56 AM
    #25
    MikeyLikesIt

    MikeyLikesIt Supercharged Mileage Master

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Member:
    #60053
    Messages:
    334
    Gender:
    Male
    See, I told you these threads always get town apart by some guy stating drum brakes are better.

    The discussion was which Toyota models share the same basic rear brake design, but offer disc brakes. With the intention of performing a low dollar rear disc conversion.
     
  6. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:11 AM
    #26
    maxamillion2345

    maxamillion2345 Go home if you don't like guns liquor and whores.

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Member:
    #31761
    Messages:
    7,809
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Max
    Nevada
    Vehicle:
    Ferd Fteenthousand 6.4
    Tuner.
    Many class 8 trucks are going to discs believe it or not. FWIW



    and I know FAR too much about the damn systems while barely scratching the surface :frusty:
     
  7. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:16 AM
    #27
    jberry813

    jberry813 The Mad Scientist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    13,948
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    Resurrected LT TRD S/C 4x4
    TRD Supercharger, URD 7th Injector Kit, Total Chaos LT, King Coilov....too much shit to list.
    The Phoenix [​IMG]
    Banned
    [​IMG]
    Name: Rocky
    Joined: Oct 2012, #89306
    Gender: Male
    Posts: 22
    [​IMG]



    Well that was quick.
     
  8. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:19 AM
    #28
    MikeyLikesIt

    MikeyLikesIt Supercharged Mileage Master

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Member:
    #60053
    Messages:
    334
    Gender:
    Male
    Based on his posts just in this thread, I was wondering if he was some member who was once banned before and just came back with a changed name. I know I wasn't dropping posts like that until I got to know this forum and my truck a little better.
     
  9. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:21 AM
    #29
    jberry813

    jberry813 The Mad Scientist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    13,948
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    Resurrected LT TRD S/C 4x4
    TRD Supercharger, URD 7th Injector Kit, Total Chaos LT, King Coilov....too much shit to list.
    ^Yep. Not a doubt in my mind.
     
  10. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:21 AM
    #30
    Zombie Runner

    Zombie Runner Are these black helicopters for me?

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Member:
    #5246
    Messages:
    15,077
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Wichita Falls, TX
    Vehicle:
    Tundra, double cab.
    LED interior lights, stubby antenna, Pioneer in dash screen
  11. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:25 AM
    #31
    jberry813

    jberry813 The Mad Scientist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    13,948
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    Resurrected LT TRD S/C 4x4
    TRD Supercharger, URD 7th Injector Kit, Total Chaos LT, King Coilov....too much shit to list.
  12. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:27 AM
    #32
    DoorDing

    DoorDing Thank you, Nancy Roman

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2012
    Member:
    #86445
    Messages:
    24,987
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB Off-Road 4WD
    Nice shot, but he's the one that talked about performance, so I extrapolated that to high performance situations. All he had to do was qualify his remark, which he later did.

    Seemed pretty Shempy to me before Jason's heads up. ^^^
     
  13. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:39 AM
    #33
    badger

    badger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Member:
    #70102
    Messages:
    756
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    07 SR5
    I know this is not a "which is better" thread, so I won't belabor it. I have built a few brake systems for vehicles from scratch and typically the rear axles in question came originally equipped with drums. The question of the disk brake conversion was there. Except in instances where the brakes had to endure long application or braking from extreme high speed, the benefit on the rear just wasn't there. The disks do have the advantage in resisting brake fade and that is what makes them so valualble in the front where braking force is very high. In fact all the disk/drum systems involved the use of a proportioning valve to dial down the braking in the rear to prevent lockup. More braking efficiency would have just meant a lower setting on the valve.

    In high performance applications like sports cars, a major factor to consider is unsprung weight. It's especially important on light vehicles with independent suspension. The decision to use disks on performance cars with 4 wheel independent suspension is largely driven by that. On a heavy solid axle, the added weight of the drum is less important.

    The need for a disk is design criteria specific, and you can't compare apples to oranges.

    Sorry if I interrupted :rolleyes:
     
  14. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:43 AM
    #34
    mjp2

    mjp2 Living vicariously though myself Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Member:
    #924
    Messages:
    17,282
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Milton Juevos Portimous II
    NJ
    Vehicle:
    '06 TRD Access Cab, v6, 6-speed
    Scaffolding and a painted grill
    Avoid this kit like the plague.
     
  15. Oct 19, 2012 at 10:46 AM
    #35
    jberry813

    jberry813 The Mad Scientist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    13,948
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    Resurrected LT TRD S/C 4x4
    TRD Supercharger, URD 7th Injector Kit, Total Chaos LT, King Coilov....too much shit to list.
    ^Was patiently waiting for you to post. :D
     
  16. Oct 19, 2012 at 11:02 AM
    #36
    mjp2

    mjp2 Living vicariously though myself Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Member:
    #924
    Messages:
    17,282
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Milton Juevos Portimous II
    NJ
    Vehicle:
    '06 TRD Access Cab, v6, 6-speed
    Scaffolding and a painted grill
    lol I was just spectating for a bit. :p

    On the bright side, at least Tundra Racing realized that its kit's parking brake it 100% useless and went with a more stout solution for those willing to shell out the cash. I hadn't seen this one before:
    That said, the stock master cylinder can only flow so much fluid. Something designed to flow for drum brake wheel cylinders is gonna have a crap time trying to keep up with the volume requirements of disc brake calipers.
     
  17. Oct 19, 2012 at 11:05 AM
    #37
    jberry813

    jberry813 The Mad Scientist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    13,948
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    Resurrected LT TRD S/C 4x4
    TRD Supercharger, URD 7th Injector Kit, Total Chaos LT, King Coilov....too much shit to list.
    :quickdraw:

     
  18. Oct 19, 2012 at 11:07 AM
    #38
    mjp2

    mjp2 Living vicariously though myself Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Member:
    #924
    Messages:
    17,282
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Milton Juevos Portimous II
    NJ
    Vehicle:
    '06 TRD Access Cab, v6, 6-speed
    Scaffolding and a painted grill
  19. Oct 19, 2012 at 11:45 AM
    #39
    DoorDing

    DoorDing Thank you, Nancy Roman

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2012
    Member:
    #86445
    Messages:
    24,987
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB Off-Road 4WD
    Why? It looks like a great kit! They even include an upgraded master cylinder to deal with the heavier volume dema ... oh, they don't.

    $800 sounds like a lot of money to spend for something that's likely to screw up your truck. mjp2, do you have a thread discussing this kit's failings? I think it'd be an interesting read.
     
  20. Oct 19, 2012 at 11:49 AM
    #40
    jberry813

    jberry813 The Mad Scientist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    13,948
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    Resurrected LT TRD S/C 4x4
    TRD Supercharger, URD 7th Injector Kit, Total Chaos LT, King Coilov....too much shit to list.
    Perhaps you missed the part where I linked 5 threads on the subject on the first page...
     
To Top